Oh the irony. You stood up for this game, and you try to turn the table on me saying that I support slavery? Nice job at entirely missing a point, dumbass.kinapuffar said:WW2 games.MASTACHIEFPWN said:Yes, but those are in fictional invornments. This was real.kinapuffar said:You fucking hypocrites.
Nothing wrong with running around New York mowing down innocent civilians or generally just executing people left and right.
New Deus Ex game is getting flak for stereotypes, not being rewarded for breaking people's arms and legs and then punching them in the face.
But gods forbid they make a game about slavery, how utterly distasteful!
In real life, You can't just bring a machinegun to a metropolis, kill 50 people, and expect to esacpe- Games like that are just low entertainment, which some people find fun.
But this, this is real. This happened. These people were tourchered for nothing, in an unfair and unjust world. And it still happens today.
What else you got?
Also, suggesting that a war game based on a real war is fiction because it doesn't contain any real people, whilst claiming that a game based on slavery is not, suggests that you think all slaves are just nameless things, and that even if the game doesn't name a single historical slave, a fictional one is essentially the same as real one.
That's sort of racist.
Slaves weren't just an abstract concept, they were actual people.
This is so obviously a joke, and a damned good one, too.Moeez said:This is a real game.
At first, I thought this might be an eager game depicting the plight of slaves in an adventure game sense. Maybe an history education game. But NOPE, check out the insane trailer:
Except for the hilarious Wilhelm scream, this game's goals are in really bad taste. "BECOME THE MOST POWERFUL SLAVETRADER".
http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/4260/slaverythegame.jpg
Oh yeah, it's rated AO, comes out in Spring 2012.
I think it's a matter of tastefulness. The game just comes across as a very crude and tasteless representation of slavery. The fact that it allows you to "pick your weapon" itself is a mark of a game that could have handled a controversial issue well but ultimately will pass as another tactless, idiotic game.Cleril said:I can't honestly say I'm against such a game. We have games, numerous games about wars, thousands of soldiers dying by our virtual hands. Other games we have allow us to kill innocent people or even children. Yet a game about slavery is absolutely beyond our standards?
Now the trailer does seem to show white people as the slave holders but the slaves themselves weren't depicted as any specific race so if the game doesn't depict any single race as slaves then I see no problem. Even if the game does specify race, it's history, it happened, it'd be like complaining that you associate Germans with Nazi's in a WWII game (and such games about war are one of the most popular or at least most selling games ever made, no?).
AO games don't sell too well to my knowledge, right? If the company wants to take a risk and make this game, giving it an AO rating, then why not?
And it looks like a business management type game. That would mean that the player themselves will not be inflicting direct torture to their slaves, unlike in COD where the player is the one firing the bullets and knifing their enemies directly.
Basically, unnecessary controversy and somewhat of a double standard taking place here.
Since there is no person has done thatAvaholic03 said:C'mon, enough with the hate. It's been decades since most people were able to practice their slave trading. If we don't practice how will be be able to stay on top of our game?
(...I feel like I should make it clear that I'm being sarcastic, becuase inevitable some dumbass will take me seriously)