As far as having a seperate body to regulate videogames goes, yes, but the system PEGI uses currently being put into law is way off. They gave Civ IV a 12 rating for god sake. As a guideline for parents they are about OK if erring a bit to the side of caution, but prosecuting someone for selling a 15 year old command and conquer or modern warfare is just stupid. That's really my issue, most of the games I see getting a 15 or 18 certificate from the BBFC deserve it (well, the 15 at least) but PEGI ratings come off as excessive.coldalarm said:As far as I'm aware, PEGI will be replacing the BBFC for games. The BBFC will then continue to rate films and DVDs. It frees up the BBFC and allows PEGI to rate what they know, i.e. games.
Makes a lot more sense to me.
What did you do!?!?!brainslurper said:Wait, so mods are included in the games rating? Yay, now I am going to go give mario an M rating.
Just to be pedantic, Modern Warfare was 15, MW2 was 18. C&C4 was a 16 (Closest PEGI has to the BBFC 15), although C&C:RA3 is a bit funny as it's a BBFC 12 and a PEGI 16. I would agree with BBFC on that one, although looking at the BBFC rating's details I can see why PEGI opted for the 16. As for Civ IV, the 12 rating is roughly in line with the other ratings. ESRB gave it an E10+, whereas the next rating down for PEGI is 7. 12 is probably a more sensible rating, although in the grand scheme of things it's irrelevant as someone 12 or under is likely not going to be much use at Civ IV anyway.scumofsociety said:As far as having a seperate body to regulate videogames goes, yes, but the system PEGI uses currently being put into law is way off. They gave Civ IV a 12 rating for god sake. As a guideline for parents they are about OK if erring a bit to the side of caution, but prosecuting someone for selling a 15 year old command and conquer or modern warfare is just stupid. That's really my issue, most of the games I see getting a 15 or 18 certificate from the BBFC deserve it (well, the 15 at least) but PEGI ratings come off as excessive.
That's funny, I'm looking at my MW box right now and it's got a PEGI 16 rating. I was refering to generals with C&C, I don't know the others.coldalarm said:Just to be pedantic, Modern Warfare was 15, MW2 was 18. C&C4 was a 16 (Closest PEGI has to the BBFC 15), although C&C:RA3 is a bit funny as it's a BBFC 12 and a PEGI 16. I would agree with BBFC on that one, although looking at the BBFC rating's details I can see why PEGI opted for the 16. As for Civ IV, the 12 rating is roughly in line with the other ratings. ESRB gave it an E10+, whereas the next rating down for PEGI is 7. 12 is probably a more sensible rating, although in the grand scheme of things it's irrelevant as someone 12 or under is likely not going to be much use at Civ IV anyway.
The PEGI system is more descriptive. Whereas a 15 rated game might not have any details, the PEGI one will have icons suggesting there's violence, drugs, etc. in the game. I'm looking at the games on my shelves, and the PEGI ratings come across as much clearer.
Either way, a rating board should over-rate rather than under-rate. Say the next GTA game sat between a PEGI 16 and PEGI 18, where do you think it should go? It's not enough to be an 18, but it's too much for a 16, so it would have to be an 18, wouldn't it?
you realize this means i have to kill you now, right? along with everyone in this conversation?Ser Imp said:More likeAbedeus said:Mah boi I'mma slap you silly for this post.Ser Imp said:Glad Skyrim doesn't try to cloud the issue.
OT: I don't know why you bothered writing all that, I was sold at "Slow mo decapitations".
WAIT THIS WASN'T A COMMERCIAL?! Holy crap I've been
*puts on sunglasses*
BLIIIINDED BY THE LIIIGHT!
BLINDED BY DE-LIGHT
Yep, it was an okay game. Though the SoF gimmick of being able to shoot people into pieces (at least that's all I really remember about it) quickly showed up in lots of other places.nikki191 said:haha anyone else old enough to remember the crap that was flying around about soldier of fortune and how it was going to destroy the moral fibre of teenagers worldwide?
The ESRB's second look at the game was prompted by the nude skins, but in the process of re-rating they discovered things like the mutilated corpses in the Dark Brotherhood quest line according to Wikipedia.Danceofmasks said:Wait .. I thought the ESRB backflip on Oblivion's rating was due to the Dark Brotherhood quests which they were unaware of, and not some nudie crap?
Yeah, the silly Fallout games with exploding bodies annoyed me, too.DarqueMage said:I hope the decapitations are at least somewhat plausible and not the Fallout 3/New Vegas type. I love those games to death, but two 9mm bullets to the forehead causing someone's intact head to fall off from their cleanly cut neck is a little goofy.
The ESRB's second look at the game was prompted by the nude skins, but in the process of re-rating they discovered things like the mutilated corpses in the Dark Brotherhood quest line according to Wikipedia.Danceofmasks said:Wait .. I thought the ESRB backflip on Oblivion's rating was due to the Dark Brotherhood quests which they were unaware of, and not some nudie crap?