JonnWood said:
Griffolion said:
At uni we did a topic on blame assignment in cases of sexual assault. Put simply, men tended to blame the woman more if she was dressed scantily than if she was dressed 'respectably'.
Sample size? Were these men or actual perps?
Was an undergraduate 2 week project. 60 respondents consisting of 30 men, 30 women. 4 groups: Male, scantily dressed | male, respectably dressed | female, scantily dressed | female, respectably dressed.
All participants read a shot vignette which basically depicted a girl going out with friends and getting sexually assaulted by a guy she'd met at a club. The two obvious differentiators were in one she was respectably dressed (jeans, blouse, sensible shoes etc) and the other she was dressed scantily (mini skirt, boob tube, 3 inch heels etc).
After reading they were asked a 10 pointed questionnaire, two of the questions were the ones we were looking at, the other 8 were to detract any suspicion and thus reduce the chance of getting socially favourable answers.
See my original post for the basic gist of the results. They conformed to pre-existing literature among the academic community.
I should also mention, the male participants were not screened for previous convictions or anything and were completely unwitting to the study until we opportunistically approached them.