Yeah, I don't believe it's going to perform to promises. If it can, I'll consider buying one. But for now, I'll stick with my money.
Laughing Man said:This thing will fail and fail hard.
1). It's a cut down version of a product that already has no market, i.e the Steam Machine
2). Due to it's size and obvious hardware limitations it will have an even more limited game market than the Steam machine already has.
3). It's targeting a market that has resulted in failure for every manufacturer that has released a console in to it. I.e the attempt to deliver direct ports of home games console games (in this case PC games) to the handheld market. The reason why the Gameboy and it's many iterations have succeeded is because the games were never direct ports (in most cases) they were games designed from the ground up to work on the handheld.
Also
Powerful enough to play any game on the market: Portal 2, DOTA, Left 4 Dead 2, Team Fortress 2, SOMA, Civilization V, Metro: Last Light Redux, Borderlands 2, The Witcher 2
GTA5, wait a minute unpacked GTA5 comes out at 85Gb and the device only has 64Gb of internal memory, so NO not powerful enough to play ANY game on the market.
Steam isn't making this, the group SMACH is. A steam machine is simply a machine that has steam on it.9tailedflame said:Ehhh, to be honest, i like that steam is purely PC right now. I mean don't get me wrong, portability is nice, but i feel like if steam start's making consoles, they'll start putting more effort and resources into supporting that console than supporting PCs. I mean i love steam, but there's more work to be done in other areas before making a console.
No their really really isn't. Their was a nugget of a market when this entire stupid idea popped up around 2 years ago. Since then the PC market has moved on MS has moved on with their delivery of Windows 10 and tech has moved on, you can now buy full fat Windows PCs that are as small as compact and about the same price and they will play your FULL Steam Library. The only feature of note in the Steam Machine, the Streaming service, can now be done better by dedicated devices that are smaller and cheaper and anyone who owns a Nivdia card can get a better streaming service using a Nvidia shield. The market has gone, Valve are late to the party and their Steam Machines are a dead concept that will sell purely on the Valve fanboy hype, however if ever the concept that if you throw enough shit at a wall you will find a nice chunk of tasty corn the Steam controller is proof of this. The controller is the only thing that will make Valve any real cash out of this entire pointless waste of time. Finally gamers have an alternative to the XBox controller for their PCs.1) Says you but the reality is that there is in fact a market for Steam Machines.
I don't get what you don't get. Just because lots of people say something is unrealistic, that doesn't mean the company making this follows the same opinion. The industry isn't some sort of hivemind.UsefulPlayer 1 said:Nerds always tell me a gaming laptop is unrealistic, now there is advertising for a gaming handheld...
I don't get it.
I think the argument, that I've used several times myself, is that if you're going to spend all that money on a gaming laptop, to game on, it's far, far more efficient to simply get a desktop unless you really need something that the laptop can offer (portability and size) that the desktop can't because you generally can't replace your GPU in a laptop. A handheld though, while its main benefits are still size and portability, is a whole other beast because of just how big that difference is.UsefulPlayer 1 said:Nerds always tell me a gaming laptop is unrealistic, now there is advertising for a gaming handheld...
I don't get it.