So, PS3 owners....

Recommended Videos

Eggsnham

New member
Apr 29, 2009
4,052
0
0
IamSofaKingRaw said:
How you been holding up these past 48 hours with no PSn. I find that I actually do not want to play video games unless I am laying online competitively. I tried going for the platinum in InFamous the past two days (I just need 16 more shards, drain 750 gigawatts and unlock the rest of the evil powers).

Subtopic: For some reason, I find games like RDR and Assassins Creed boring because of the fact that you have to spend most of your time traveling to missions. You are bound by ingame laws to not go on rampant murdering sprees so you can't do anything entertaining on your way to mission markers either. Got AC2 when it came out, only completed about 10% of it, got RDR 2 months ago, barely did anything. (Traveling on horse from city to city was very annoying.)
RDR does have fast travel ya' know.

Anyways, it's annoying, I started wanting to play BFBC2 around the same time PSN went under, so that was aggravating.
 

LightningBanks

New member
Apr 15, 2009
789
0
0
Two words: Demon souls. Without messages helping me, Im like a lemming 0_o

Otherwise, Im fine.

HassEsser said:
Ok, I guess. I play PC 80% of the time, my DS 15% of the time and PS3 the other 5%. So, I haven't actually noticed the down time at all.
Due to this reason
 

JoshGod

New member
Aug 31, 2009
1,472
0
0
Snake Plissken said:
JoshGod said:
IamSofaKingRaw said:
got RDR 2 months ago, barely did anything. (Traveling on horse from city to city was very annoying.)
you know there is a fast travel?
I 100 percented RDR. I didn't notice that there was quick travel until about 95%. I want 3 days of my life back...
I did the the same thing, but i don't regret all that time spent riding horses.
 

pulse2

New member
May 10, 2008
2,932
0
0
There's plenty to do inside and outside of gaming without PSN, dunno why everyone is making a big ruckus about it :/ Is this how sad we are that we have to FIND things to do because online isn't working?
 

Brutal Peanut

This is so freakin aweso-BLARGH!
Oct 15, 2010
1,769
0
0
I hadn't been on it much, besides using Netflix. Which apparently I can't watch through my PS3 without the network. It wont link up.It keeps giving me the message that the Network is 'under maintenance' and I can not sign in. But I just watch the movies and anime on my laptop instead.

What kind of sucked was I finally decided to give Little Big Planet(2) a chance and wanted to see some of the online levels (or user made levels) and the PSN goes down the same day after both games arrive in the mail. Balls.

I primarily play on the PC - so I've been traipsing around New Vegas again. I don't think it's affected me as much. Just a bit inconvenient with the arrival of LBP 1 & 2.
 

Oh That Dude

New member
Nov 22, 2009
460
0
0
Radelaide said:
Oh That Dude said:
Radelaide said:
JackWestJr said:
Has everyone forgot that games also have NON-ONLINE components? God, c'mon people, if this is the case, what was gaming before this generation like? O_O
My point, too! What the hell? You don't want to play games unless you're not playing against someone else online? Here's a though! Get a friend to play with you! Jeez...

/goes back to playing her single player games and enjoying them.
Yeah, you guys! Stop enjoying different things to us! Dicks.
My point is: If you can't enjoy a game by yourself, then what the hell is the point? And yes, I am a dick but for ENTIRELY different reasons.
Well, there is no point in playing single player if you don't enjoy gaming by yourself, you're right. I don't see the issue here though, so what if people only enjoy multiplayer? That's a point in it's own right. You don't have to enjoy single player to enjoy a game, or for there to be a point to it.

Also I was sarcastically calling them dicks, not you.
 

kazriko

New member
Apr 6, 2009
51
0
0
As for the original subject of this thread, I'm mostly a single-player gamer, so I had plenty of fun with Portal 2, Mass Effect 2, and Sly Cooper 3 while PSN was down. The main thing that affected me was the lack of ability to link my Steam account to the PS3, and the fact that there were 4 PSN games I wanted to purchase that friday, but couldn't. I did cancel and reissue my credit card, but that was only a minor inconvenience.

As for the PS2 emulation thing, some of this seems to be lost to the sands of time and only a few of us geeks actually know the full story behind it.

ShadowKatt said:
ACTUALLY, I don't know why they removed it. I've heard it was a cost cutting measure. I've also heard that it was a conflict issue, though I don't believe that. I didn't get one of the first two waves of PS3s, but mine still does PS1 games. My mate has one of the first two waves and hers does PS1 and 2 games. Now, they don't do it at all, and I can't comprehend it since it still plays CDs and DVDs, just not SONY GAMES. I've also heard it was a way to keep the PS2 relevant, done purposefully so that people would still be forced to buy PS2 hardware(consoles, controllers, memory cards, etc etc).
To emulate PS1 games, a 12 year old platform at the time that was running primarily on a 33mhz MIPS, they went the pure Software emulation route, because the PS1 was simple enough and low end enough to emulated on a 7-core 3.2ghz system. The PS3 still supports PS1 games on disc even now.

To run PS2 games though, they had to build a custom chip. The PS2 was a EE 3-core 300mhz system (That also had a 33mhz mips chip for PS1 emulation) with a fancy graphics chip GS that worked on multilayered textures (that couldn't push that many polygons, in a way it's very similar to the Matrox Parhelia chip,) and an extremely fast common memory bus where the GPU, CPU, and 33mhz MIPS could all talk at high speed. I heard rumors that the chip itself was costing sony more than $60 each because it was not the same chip that they used on the PS2 itself at the time.

They spent at least 2 years trying to emulate the PS2 in software on the PS3, but the best that they could do was emulating the EE 3-core CPU on the Cell, and installing a GS chip to handle the graphics. This was cheaper since it took half the silicon of the EEGS chip, but it was one that they couldn't get economies of scale on since it was only used in the 80gig PS3. (Not to mention being slower than the EEGS chip on some games.) Thus, they decided that it was more trouble than it was worth and took it out for the 40gig PS3 and the PS3 Slim.

OtherOS support is more questionable, they did that because someone broke out of the Linux sandbox and got full access to the GPU, and they were afraid it would lead to piracy. I still think it was a foolish move because removing OtherOS ended up spurring all of the piracy and hacking that followed.