So what'd you think of Prometheus?

Recommended Videos

Azahul

New member
Apr 16, 2011
419
0
0
I quite enjoyed it, but more than that, it was damned beautiful. Just the scenery was gorgeous, particularly in the opening sequence. The plot had holes, and it was pretty much impossible to find the abortion scene anything more than laughable, but the actual visuals were such a joy to watch (although the tunnels could be a bit annoying) I didn't really care.

Seriously, after all the dirt-brown and grimey action movies we get these days, I was just really nice to see a movie open with all those blues and greens.
 

Terrible Opinions

New member
Sep 11, 2011
498
0
0
Decent enough, but it seemed like someone had cut, like, 40 minutes or so from the movie, so it slowly turned into this disjointed mess of unfulfilled plot points.

No excuse for the bits with the geologist and the biologist or the "just take five steps to your left" scene, though.
 

FrozenCones

New member
Dec 31, 2009
291
0
0
Its not a prequel to Alien its just set in the same universe.

It did leave a lot of unanswered questions which i'm hoping will be resolved in possible later installments.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Dr. Cakey said:
I personally hated it. Actually, give me a sec...ah, there it is...

It was truly vapid.

Every second of it was the least enjoyable second of any experience I've had in cinema.

The best part was the panoramas in the beginning, it went downhill once anyone started doing anything :/.

FrozenCones said:
Its not a prequel to Alien its just set in the same universe.

It did leave a lot of unanswered questions which i'm hoping will be resolved in possible later installments.
I believe it was written by someone who worked on lost so those unanswered questions have no answers, just more psuedo intellectualism.

Abandon4093 said:
That's a really bad criticism. The only character it really damningly applies to is David. And I personally chalked his actions up to curiosity.
What?


I only wrote so much because I came in with nearly 0 expectations and left watching a paint by numbers example of poor cinema.
 

Cheery Lunatic

New member
Aug 18, 2009
1,565
0
0
It has its haters but I ultimately enjoyed it and I look forward to its sequel (which is weird considering it's a prequel, but whatever).
 

The Madman

New member
Dec 7, 2007
4,404
0
0
Shit movie. Pretty to look at and visually stunning, but the instant you stop to actually think about... well, anything, the whole thing comes crashing down and the movies revealed for the idiotic mess it is.

Went to go see it in theater with a friend, very nearly ended up walking out. In fact several people in the theater did. At least Avatar was entertaining in terms of 'pretty but dumb', Prometheus was just thoroughly unpleasant.
 

PrimitiveJudge

New member
Aug 14, 2012
368
0
0
You have to remember it is supposed to be a two part movie, there is that whole issue it it crash landing and people finding out where it went and such.. huge gaps in the plot that Scott Ridley left for the sequal, just don't know what is up with the dad dead and all.

Oh and I fucking loved it. Not aliens worth but definantly National Geographic worthy. It is the land scape documentary of a life time. Great ideas but today everyone cannot get scared unless someone opens the core of fear. I have a idea of doing so, but I don't feel like it is a public comment. Anyways, Loved the movie, awaiting the second part.
 

Rawberry101

New member
Jan 14, 2012
136
0
0
I think it's interesting how many people didn't enjoy this movie. It also needs to be noted that everyone seems to be polarized with their opinions on the film. Most people liked it or they really hated it. I definitely saw it as a well made film. If nothing else it got people to talk about some actual heavy issues, which is something nowadays. The cinematography was also stellar, and while it was computer generated it didn't look that way, which it exceedingly rare.

I also have to say that the gore in this movie, while not what is common in horror films today, was absolutely disgusting. Very few films generate the sickness factor that a few of the scenes here did for me.

theultimateend said:
Every second of it was the least enjoyable second of any experience I've had in cinema.
Something tells me this is exaggeration. If not then I guess this poster always picks real winners when going to the theater. Prometheus may have been a long and arduous watch for some but it's a masterpiece compared to the day to day fare in theaters. I have a hard time believing this poster hasn't seen a worse film 'in cinema'.
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
I have a number of problems with the film. First, in the broad sense, the movie sought to serve two aims: explore the idea we were created by something-other-than-god, and set up the prequel to the Alien franchise. In my estimation, it scores poorly on both. The engineer theory was intriguing and what most of the movie was based around exploring. Yet other than simply asserting (with no real evidence given I might add) that people were designed by aliens, what did they do? They didn't answer why we were made. They didn't answer why the engineers wanted to destroy us. Simply waving a hand in the direction of an idea is not an exploration nor is it suitable to drive a plot with. The Alien prequel didn't really work either. The Xenomorphs came from somewhere. Then we see that they were designed to kill us. That doesn't describe a monster, it describes a weapon and in a movie supposedly paying homage to a classic of space horror, reducing your monsters to something no more frightening than a bomb is an enormous misstep.

Beyond that, there were other less important issues largely related to character motivation. As I observed (and can recall) these are:

1) Does it not seem odd that within minutes of arriving at a point of light 34 light years from earth the cast is able to locate a small patch of land totaling a few square kilometers when there is nothing terribly notable about this space from a distance of more than a few miles?

2) Why does the security team discard their weapons when the cast is about to set foot on an alien planet which could be teeming with hostile life? There is no reasonable cause for them to do something so bafflingly stupid.

3) In a world of autonomous drones, why don't they simply map the ruin before running inside.

4) Why does the leading man take off his helmet when they encounter an inexplicable pocket of breathable air? Seems like they should determine what's keeping that pocket in place before risking suffocation.

5) How does the guy making the map get lost when he has a very high tech map?

6) How come no one noticed anything amiss about the two missing people until the second act? I mean, it isn't as though they popped over to a coffee shop.

7) When a storm is coming and perfectly acceptable cover is available, why do you engage in a high speed run across open ground rather than wait in aforementioned perfectly acceptable cover?

8) Why didn't anyone ever question where the Android was wandering off to? Or ask any question ever about what the hell he was doing at any given moment?

9) After retrieving an alien head, what possible purpose is served trying to revive it?

10) Why did the android infect the male lead?

11) Why was the android so interested in the alien embryo when neither his "father", nor the corporate woman seemed interested in the same?

12) Why did the medical staff try to put the female doctor into cryo rather than use the perfectly functional surgical apparatus? That demand didn't come from the corporate woman as she was quite content to not let anything resembling an alien on the ship. It also didn't come from the head of the corporation since only two parties on the ship knew he was present and one of them wasn't in a position of authority.

13) Why did no one even comment on the major surgery undertaken by the female lead?

14) Why did the crew open the door for a missing man with a breached suit when just prior to this the corporate female torched the leading man?

15) Why did the remaining crew of the ship immediately accept they'd need to kamikaze the alien ship when the demand was made by a woman clearly not in her right mind?

16) Why did the android offer to help when it seemed to spend the movie undermining every action undertaken by the humans?

In general, the movie can be enjoyed I suppose but it is a textbook case of fridge logic. While you watch, it seems reasonable enough until you pause for a moment to consider any of a number of things. Tugging at a thread reveals the movie is not whole cloth - it is simply a pile of yarn arranged in a pleasing pattern.
 

Calibanbutcher

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2009
1,702
8
43
Eclectic Dreck said:
I have a number of problems with the film. First, in the broad sense, the movie sought to serve two aims: explore the idea we were created by something-other-than-god, and set up the prequel to the Alien franchise. In my estimation, it scores poorly on both. The engineer theory was intriguing and what most of the movie was based around exploring. Yet other than simply asserting (with no real evidence given I might add) that people were designed by aliens, what did they do? They didn't answer why we were made. They didn't answer why the engineers wanted to destroy us. Simply waving a hand in the direction of an idea is not an exploration nor is it suitable to drive a plot with. The Alien prequel didn't really work either. The Xenomorphs came from somewhere. Then we see that they were designed to kill us. That doesn't describe a monster, it describes a weapon and in a movie supposedly paying homage to a classic of space horror, reducing your monsters to something no more frightening than a bomb is an enormous misstep.

Beyond that, there were other less important issues largely related to character motivation. As I observed (and can recall) these are:

1) Does it not seem odd that within minutes of arriving at a point of light 34 light years from earth the cast is able to locate a small patch of land totaling a few square kilometers when there is nothing terribly notable about this space from a distance of more than a few miles?

2) Why does the security team discard their weapons when the cast is about to set foot on an alien planet which could be teeming with hostile life? There is no reasonable cause for them to do something so bafflingly stupid.

3) In a world of autonomous drones, why don't they simply map the ruin before running inside.

4) Why does the leading man take off his helmet when they encounter an inexplicable pocket of breathable air? Seems like they should determine what's keeping that pocket in place before risking suffocation.

5) How does the guy making the map get lost when he has a very high tech map?

6) How come no one noticed anything amiss about the two missing people until the second act? I mean, it isn't as though they popped over to a coffee shop.

7) When a storm is coming and perfectly acceptable cover is available, why do you engage in a high speed run across open ground rather than wait in aforementioned perfectly acceptable cover?

8) Why didn't anyone ever question where the Android was wandering off to? Or ask any question ever about what the hell he was doing at any given moment?

9) After retrieving an alien head, what possible purpose is served trying to revive it?

10) Why did the android infect the male lead?

11) Why was the android so interested in the alien embryo when neither his "father", nor the corporate woman seemed interested in the same?

12) Why did the medical staff try to put the female doctor into cryo rather than use the perfectly functional surgical apparatus? That demand didn't come from the corporate woman as she was quite content to not let anything resembling an alien on the ship. It also didn't come from the head of the corporation since only two parties on the ship knew he was present and one of them wasn't in a position of authority.

13) Why did no one even comment on the major surgery undertaken by the female lead?

14) Why did the crew open the door for a missing man with a breached suit when just prior to this the corporate female torched the leading man?

15) Why did the remaining crew of the ship immediately accept they'd need to kamikaze the alien ship when the demand was made by a woman clearly not in her right mind?

16) Why did the android offer to help when it seemed to spend the movie undermining every action undertaken by the humans?

In general, the movie can be enjoyed I suppose but it is a textbook case of fridge logic. While you watch, it seems reasonable enough until you pause for a moment to consider any of a number of things. Tugging at a thread reveals the movie is not whole cloth - it is simply a pile of yarn arranged in a pleasing pattern.
1. They were flying over the planet. You rather the film spent more than ten hours of them scanning the terrain? And they found it because "God does not create straight lines", indicating that the formations regularity gave it away as alien-made.

2.Yes, that was stupid, but since "the doctors" called the shots due to being granted autority by the old guy, not following their orders could have resulted in the security team being fired.

3.Curiosity? I mean, we have autonomous robots and yet it's still humans that explore the world.
Mostly.

4.Human curiosity. He had the chance to breathe actual air on an alien planet and it made sense for him, since the main driving force of his character seemed to be curiosity and the lust for discovering the unknown. And the old woman already said the air is cleaner than the air on earth.

5. Yes, that was true and utter BS.

6. They probably were to busy fleeing from that bitchin storm behind them to count anything.

7. Because in the perfectly adequate cover there was no hot cocoa? Hell, I dunno?
Maybe because there were tons of alien corpses there, which, whilst not endangering the structural integrity of the place, do not make for good company.

8. Everyone kinda assumed that he followed orders given to him by either the old guy or Theron's character. And Theron's character did question what he did, which is why she used his suit's cameras to spy on him. Until he turned them off.

9. I don't think they were trying to revive it, they simply tried to stimulate the nerves in order to get a better grasp on it's physiology. The revival was an unforeseen side-effect.


10. He asked the male lead what he would be willing to give for a chance to get closer to his creators. The male lead said "everything", so the android gave him some of the stuff he found in the ship which he thought might have had something to do with the creation of all humans.

11. Because this embryo would have been the offspring of a human infected with an alien bio-weapon, something only he knew, and apparently he liked the idea of conducting some more experiments.

12. The surgical apparatus was not configured for female patients and also meant for being used by the old dude and no-one else, which is why she basically had to break in there, manually tell the machine to "extract a foreign body".

13. The android did. And the rest just did not care, for they were going to meet the "engineers", which outranks "oh, you just had major surgery?".

14. Hell if I know. Maybe they thought he was ok?

15. Because it was the black guy who first deducted the purpose of the black stuff found inside the complex? Which, coupled with the new information that the ship had set course for earth, meant that now a ship loaded to the brim with an extremely dangerous bio-weapon was heading for earth, which he, as stated before, would never allow to happen.
The other crew-members were given the opportunity to abandon the ship but they decided to stick with the guy. Out of loyalt or respect or whatever, but clearly they trusted his judgement enough to be willing to give their lives for this.

16. Help?
As in:
He had his head ripped off and was unable to move and he decided to get Elizabeth to safety so she could maybe reattach his body? Maybe because otherwise he would have had to spend eternity as a head on an alien planet without company? Maybe because he felt pity for the humans, because clearly their creators were even less benevolent than his own?
 

Aaron Foltz

New member
Aug 6, 2012
69
0
0
FalloutJack said:
So happens I enjoyed it. Some people just complain too much.
Exactly. It fed my hunger for more Alien lore and backstory. I can't wait for the second one "Red and the Robo Head"

It left some things unanswered. Like the Queen Alien mural in the "head" chamber.
 

Mr.Petey

New member
Dec 23, 2009
521
0
0
For me, the question gave a roundabout satisfactory answer to the question of what the Space Jockey species was, it's history and eventual malevolent intent.
It made a nice change from what's been in other Alien films, akin to the variety found in the short story Dark Horse comics.
But...the main issue that bugged me was how damn rogue, irresponsible and downright dangerous the android David was. If I've missed a point in the movie that explains why he did what he did then that's my mistake hehe.
But seriously from my POV, sci-fi androids that seek to emulate and experience the stimuli that their human creators enjoy all too well is an endearing quality (see Data from Star Trek:TNG) It can be perceived as a child trying to understand the world around them, a sensation we've all experienced growing up and done right, stories that rotate about this concept of artificial intelligence asking "Why?" to many questions can be fairly powerful.

But David in this...he irritated me because he went out on his own with a curious nature that went...well for want of a better word, perverse and twisted. He endangered the crew quite explicitly on numerous occasions regarding the creature and while I'm aware that the "Company" in previous Alien films can be that cold and calculating when it comes to their own hidden agenda, David just seemed rogue, a wildcard with his own idea of what he alone wanted to sate his own curiosity.
Hope that makes sense ^_^
 

LightspeedJack

New member
May 2, 2010
1,478
0
0
I found it to be a extremely enjoyable sci-fi/horror film. The cinematography and effects were simply awe-inspiring and it actually made 3D look great. Plot holes? Yes, many but personally I enjoyed the overall story enough to overlook those. I don't get the backlash, sure it may not be as good as the original two Alien films but it's still better than 90% of Sci-fi and horror movies released today.
 

Saulkar

Regular Member
Legacy
Aug 25, 2010
3,142
2
13
Country
Canuckistan
RJ 17 said:
The Android wanted Weyland to die because then there'd be no one to command him so he'd be free. That or he wanted to be Weyland's legacy, it's hard to tell if he openly betrays Weyland at the end since they're speaking alienese.
Copied and pasted from the internet movie database.
According to Dr. Anil Biltoo, one of the linguists who helped create the Engineer language, David tells the Engineer "This man (referring to Weyland) is seeking more life. He believes you can give it to him." Biltoo also revealed that there was originally more of a conversation between David and the Engineer, but it was reduced to one line. It's possible these scenes will show up on the DVD.

I would take it with a grain of salt but if true despite the deviations of the android he was not devoid of loyalty.
 

Soxafloppin

Coxa no longer floppin'
Jun 22, 2009
7,918
0
0
I enjoyed watching it, I didn't invest to much in it before hand though, which seems to have been a good decision.