Yeah. Those who don't are referred to as practicing Celibacy.IceForce said:Do you hear people talk about "acting upon" their heterosexuality?
Yeah. Those who don't are referred to as practicing Celibacy.IceForce said:Do you hear people talk about "acting upon" their heterosexuality?
False. I'm gay and i wouldn't have it any other way. Like if you gave me a potion with a 100% certainty of making me a heterosexual, i'd say fuck off. Being gay is freaking awesom (granted just existing gives me the death sentence in several countries and i have severaly limited rights in most the "civilized" world). And i can safely say that the majority of gay men agree with me. Any gay man that says that he's okay with his sexuality yet if given the chance, would become a hetero, is obviously brainwashed.Toilet said:Because if homosexuals had a choice in the matter they would obviously choose to be attracted to women.
Sounds crazy but it's true.
Technically, you could see it as an actually useful genetic mutation (to put it in blunt terms), by helping keep the population in check. Think about it, if we didn't have homosexuality the population is likely to be much higher, IVF/Surrogacy only coming about in the last few decades and there still ain't that many same sex couples that do IVF or Surrogacy in the grand scheme of things. There's also the point that it's not exactly a heredity trait, so it wouldn't be "wiped out" so to speak, even if gay people never had kids.immortalfrieza said:Why? It's because as anyone who knows anything about genetics and evolution will tell you, if Homosexuality was a result of a gene then Homosexuality wouldn't exist, since it's a self culling gene. If a gene for Homosexuality was mutated into a person at some point, it couldn't be passed on to subsequent generations and thus become widespread because by the very nature of the sexual orientation Homosexuals are much less likely to have children.
But Women are so niice to look atJohnny Reb said:False. I'm gay and i wouldn't have it any other way. Like if you gave me a potion with a 100% certainty of making me a heterosexual, i'd say fuck off. Being gay is freaking awesom (granted just existing gives me the death sentence in several countries and i have severaly limited rights in most the "civilized" world). And i can safely say that the majority of gay men agree with me. Any gay man that says that he's okay with his sexuality yet if given the chance, would become a hetero, is obviously brainwashed.Toilet said:Because if homosexuals had a choice in the matter they would obviously choose to be attracted to women.
Sounds crazy but it's true.
You obviously fail to see the joke.Johnny Reb said:False. I'm gay and i wouldn't have it any other way. Like if you gave me a potion with a 100% certainty of making me a heterosexual, i'd say fuck off. Being gay is freaking awesome (granted just existing gives me the death sentence in several countries and i have severaly limited rights in most the "civilized" world). And i can safely say that the majority of gay men agree with me. Any gay man that says that he's okay with his sexuality yet if given the chance, would become a hetero, is obviously brainwashed.Toilet said:Because if homosexuals had a choice in the matter they would obviously choose to be attracted to women.
Sounds crazy but it's true.
For even Bi sexuals its not exactly a choice. Bis have a preference leaning towards opposite or same sex partners. Also this choice thing tends to be shoved down gay peoples throats (there's a joke in there somewhere) because many people fear if sexual attraction towards same sex isn't a choice then sexual attraction towards children may not be a choice. That scares the crap out of people.rutger5000 said:Honestly why is it? Don't get me wrong I've got no problems without homosexuality, in fact I can see myself experimenting some day. But for the live of me I can't see why it's most often considered offensive to think of it as a choice.
I can see that being more sexually attracted to the same sex isn't something you do so purposfully/consiously. So if you purely regard homosexuality as being dominantly sexually attracted to the same sex. Then yes it isn't really a choice, more something that just happens to you. But surely everything beyond that is a choice right?
Again I want to stress that I think it's the right choice. Sexuality is a good thing, so I'd encourage people to do whatever they want on that area as long as all involved parties are consentfull.
But still acting upon your homosexuality is surely a choice right? So why is it considered offensive to regard it as such? Especially as the alternative is to regard it as something like an affliction, which I personally would find much more offensive.
You are way way way wrong about genetics. For example, male homosexuality is believed to be passed down through the female family members of male homosexuals. Please don't take your misunderstanding of genetics and act like its law. Male baldness is also believed to be passed down from one's mom instead of dad. Also, it is currently believed that women who have had many boys lead to younger boys being more likely to be gay. The reason for this statistical fact is unknown, but it is theorized that it has something to do with conditions in the womb caused by previous male children. In this case it is not genetics that leads to homosexuality, but it certainly comes previous to birth through conditions in the womb.immortalfrieza said:People find the idea that Homosexuality is a choice offensive because they think that it demeans Homosexuality, but it really doesn't. Homosexuality is a preference, and like all preferences is the result of upbringing, both by their parents and the community at large, that eventually develops from these things into a subconscious drive. Homosexuality is no more a choice than a preference for say, Diet Coke over regular Coke, but neither is it something genetic. Why? It's because as anyone who knows anything about genetics and evolution will tell you, if Homosexuality was a result of a gene then Homosexuality wouldn't exist, since it's a self culling gene. If a gene for Homosexuality was mutated into a person at some point, it couldn't be passed on to subsequent generations and thus become widespread because by the very nature of the sexual orientation Homosexuals are much less likely to have children. It's like someone mutating a gene for a inherent tendency to kill their own children, that gene would die out with the person that first had it.
You obviously fail to know how to word a phrase so that it actually sounds like a joke.Toilet said:You obviously fail to see the joke.Johnny Reb said:False. I'm gay and i wouldn't have it any other way. Like if you gave me a potion with a 100% certainty of making me a heterosexual, i'd say fuck off. Being gay is freaking awesome (granted just existing gives me the death sentence in several countries and i have severaly limited rights in most the "civilized" world). And i can safely say that the majority of gay men agree with me. Any gay man that says that he's okay with his sexuality yet if given the chance, would become a hetero, is obviously brainwashed.Toilet said:Because if homosexuals had a choice in the matter they would obviously choose to be attracted to women.
Sounds crazy but it's true.
Males are naturally attracted towards females unless they are homosexuals which are an anomaly.Johnny Reb said:You obviously fail to know how to word a phrase so that it actually sounds like a joke.Toilet said:You obviously fail to see the joke.Johnny Reb said:False. I'm gay and i wouldn't have it any other way. Like if you gave me a potion with a 100% certainty of making me a heterosexual, i'd say fuck off. Being gay is freaking awesome (granted just existing gives me the death sentence in several countries and i have severaly limited rights in most the "civilized" world). And i can safely say that the majority of gay men agree with me. Any gay man that says that he's okay with his sexuality yet if given the chance, would become a hetero, is obviously brainwashed.Toilet said:Because if homosexuals had a choice in the matter they would obviously choose to be attracted to women.
Sounds crazy but it's true.
Hey that's messed up man. There's nothing in the genetic code that says men have to be attracted to men. That shit is just instructions on how to make proteins. Men can have sex with lots of different people and things just for no reason gay or straight. This is an enlightened society man, get out of here with the word "natural".Abomination said:Males are naturally attracted towards females unless they are homosexuals which are an anomaly.Johnny Reb said:You obviously fail to know how to word a phrase so that it actually sounds like a joke.Toilet said:You obviously fail to see the joke.Johnny Reb said:False. I'm gay and i wouldn't have it any other way. Like if you gave me a potion with a 100% certainty of making me a heterosexual, i'd say fuck off. Being gay is freaking awesome (granted just existing gives me the death sentence in several countries and i have severaly limited rights in most the "civilized" world). And i can safely say that the majority of gay men agree with me. Any gay man that says that he's okay with his sexuality yet if given the chance, would become a hetero, is obviously brainwashed.Toilet said:Because if homosexuals had a choice in the matter they would obviously choose to be attracted to women.
Sounds crazy but it's true.
If homosexuality was a choice and not ingrained like heterosexuality then why would they choose to be attracted to something they're not attracted to? It's a tautology joke.
Homosexuals are homosexuals because they're homosexuals.