I feel his pain. Where I live, your choices are Comcast or get the fuck out. No matter how much bullshit they pull, you have no choice but to move or accept a life with no high speed(relative to crappy American speed) internet.
This, a thousand times this.Smilomaniac said:So the thing is that he didn't get it on paper and decided to go ahead by buying a home.
The moral is, GET IT ON PAPER, or you're just screwing yourself. Yeah, I feel bad for the guy, and I also feel bad for my sister who did more or less the same, also with a house at stake (she sold her apartment before getting the valued price on the house she was interested in, on paper. Turns out it was worth an additional million Danish crowns than the "estimate").
It's easiest to assume that everyone is out to screw you, that no one can be trusted when it comes to money, whether is business, between friends, inheritance etc.
Get. It. On. Paper.
he doesn't need anything in writing. He made a legitimate call to the public utility inquiring about service. He was given clearly incorrect information and their own service logs and back this up. This is not one of those "well we didn't promise it in writing" situations. The call and the sales and service response count the same as a written statement. They are a matter of record. We know Comcast told him he could receive service because Comcast dispatched installers.Therumancer said:I'm guessing he can't do that because he doesn't have anything in writing proving that they told him they would provide internet to that home. I'm guessing it's all verbal, but I could be wrong.Mike Pothier said:Get a lawyer, sue their asses till they bleed money.
Corruption is global (and human, at that). To assume that Europe doesn't have its fair share of outright unmitigated horse shit is kinda out there although I will concede the fact that America really wears its corruption on its sleeve.Adam Jensen said:See, if somebody had the audacity to do this in Europe, they'd be liable to pay for any damages you might have suffered as the result. Things like cost of moving or if you lost money by having to resell the house etc.
Ugh. As much as I hate to say it (and believe me, I absolutely despise Comcast) Morabito is going to have a tough time if he decides to bring this to court. Since I left working for the Government and went into working for business, one of the things I've found, again and again, is to always make sure you have e-mail or paper confirmation for everything, do NOT take a phone conversation as confirmation. Because as soon as the shit hits the fan, suddenly that person has a mysterious case of amnesia and doesn't remember that conversation and has no clue what you're talking about, and your word against theirs doesn't really hold up in court. Actually, now that I think about it, it was pretty much the same in the Government too.StewShearer said:While the company wouldn't give him a written confirmation, in two separate phone calls the internet provider affirmed that it did. Unfortunately for Morabito, <a href=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/132223-Comcast-Announces-Plans-to-Merge-With-Time-Warner-Cable>Comcast lied.
Atmos Duality said:You're preaching to the choir on that one.
I've done temp-contract work for some of those scumbags. (Comcast, and InsightBB before the buyout most notably)
I was just trying to spread the word that there's at least two bad guys to this story, since some stories are leaving out CenturyLink's fare share. (Even the blog post barely touched that problem.) You have plenty more (quite interesting) first hand experience with Comcast's incompetence and slimy practices than me, anyways.I can see that and agree.
In my defnse, I only read the initial article in passing since I just got home when I did.
It does in the first paragraph:Vivi22 said:Nowhere in the article is anything said which states that, or even anything said that would allow you to infer that. I'm sure the man had a lot of criteria for choosing where to move, and being able to get appropriate internet service was only one of those factors. Granted, one which would be a deal breaker if service weren't available. But I have little doubt that had he been told up front he couldn't get service he wouldn't have bought the house and would have made an offer on another or kept looking.Strazdas said:And he did kinda was looking for his house based on internet access to begin with.
If your job relies on you having internet connection and you work from home, then having no internet connection is most definatelly a no-buy unless you are going to look for a new job on top of a new house.That in mind, when Morabito bought his first home earlier this year, he made sure to contact Comcast to make sure their local services extended to his new "dream home."
See, in Europe we at least pretend its illegal.DerangedHobo said:Corruption is global (and human, at that). To assume that Europe doesn't have its fair share of outright unmitigated horse shit is kinda out there although I will concede the fact that America really wears its corruption on its sleeve.Adam Jensen said:See, if somebody had the audacity to do this in Europe, they'd be liable to pay for any damages you might have suffered as the result. Things like cost of moving or if you lost money by having to resell the house etc.
The big jerk in that whole mess was Cogent who wouldn't pay higher fees to Level 3(the BACKBONE of the internet) due to all of the bandwidth they were using with netflix which was over 80% of their bandwidth usage.AgedGrunt said:This was the corporation that got into it with Netflix, claiming that it was to blame in a dispute over service problems, basically faulting Netflix for being too popular.
This was the competing telecommunications corporation that thousands of people are leaving for services like Netflix, which are the future beyond the miserable, expensive, outdated cable television model.
This was the competing telecommunications corporation that was offered, by Netflix, a server holding the most popular Netflix titles in cache in order to streamline service to clients and alleviate network load. Comcast refused.
This was the corporation that demanded (and successfully won) a shakedown agreement; Netflix paid-up in a deal with Comcast after an ugly dispute.
This was the corporation that, somehow, fixed everything just days after that deal, which would have necessitated enterprise-level upgrades that could not possibly have been completed in that time period.
Just remember, these are the guys against new internet rules, too, and they have a lot of money for gift baskets for politicians.
'Internet negativity' quota, I like that. I shall adopt that as well, I thinkValanthe said:Sadly, there's an incredibly simple answer to that. Comcast, for a large part of their service area, are a monopoly. Your choices are to either eat their shit with a forced smile and say you love it, or not have internet. I'll admit I haven't read his blog post, as frankly, I've hit my internet negativity quota for the week, but it sounds like, if he's in a remote enough area where thinking to ask if Comcast covered it actually came to mind, then Comcast is probably the only provider in the area.Boba Frag said:OT: Ugh, good grief, that poor guy was really put through the ringer.
How are these fucking clowns even in business any more?