viranimus said:
Scars Unseen said:
viranimus said:
But I too am a little resentful at yet another opportunity being taken to try and scapegoat religion. Really im not even a religious person, but its such a worn out tedious trope that really is just as hypocritical as what it is supposed to be rallying against, But i digress.
I really can't understand this. Look at the world around you. Pay attention to the news, certain extreme political speeches, terrorist propaganda and the like. Do any of these accurately reflect you, your beliefs or those of the people you know? Then why would you assume that the antagonists of this game are modeled after your beliefs and not the very real extremists I just mentioned?
Its really simple. Its the way that the gaming industry portrays religion. Consistently religion as a whole is portrayed as nothing but religious zealots bent on death and destruction to all who oppose their system of belief. There is also the reoccuring theme that religion is inherently corrupt monstrosity preying on the desparate and ignorant.
Honestly, its sort of like Iran getting pissed off because they see Battlefield 3 implying that Iran is nothing but terrorists who want to chop other peoples heads off and blow up shit with RPGs
Seriously, when was the last time you saw a game try to portray religion (even its own fictional made up ones) in any light other than negative?
Umm. Quite often. Many games have religion as a positive, RPGs and 4Xs give special magic powers to religious characters (In fantasy ones) That either buff them up, or allow them to take down evil easier. Not necessarily make them able to take down other neutrals and good easily - look at Holy Light in WC3, healed any living, killed any undead. When it doesn't do magic stuff, it is reflected in games like Civ IV to provide HAPPINESS bonuses to your people. There is no unhappiness from religion, only happiness.
Religion is an easy target to pin stuff on thanks to the way that many religious people act. Many don't sit back and be quiet, but will openly attack those who aren't religious, and sometimes those who are. I'm not just talking Westborough here, but other literal fanatics too. These people generally are given more publicity than the good religious people as they are controversial. Someone saying 'We should all understand that religion is a choice, not a necessity' whilst being religious is not going to get as much coverage as someone saying 'All you atheists are blasphemers, and need to go to hell! Believe in god or suffer the consequences!', and is screaming that around town. The former generally is quiet, and what the mind of most people is - not too interesting - the later is going around declaring stuff to the world, and is highly controversial in their message. = more views for whatever news show/magazine.
This is why religion gets a bad name mostly in these cases, with fanatical leaders and such. This (Hopefully) minority who is rather vocal at times, and sticks in everybody - theist, atheist or agnostic - 's head as being annoying and somewhat villainous. It is these people that things involving Religious fanatics are usually based off - the fanatics. You don't want to get grouped with them, show people you are different. You don't have to do anything special, hell, doing nothing at all is preferable. People will accept you as you, and not a fanatic. Of further help would be getting people to actually shut the fanatics down, but that would end up as even more trouble overall.
Besides, there have been games and movies that target pretty much everyone as a villain - atheists largely included. Hell, pop culture is in movies and games that religion is good. How often do you see that evil monster being the good guy, and the priest with the sign of the cross as the bad guy in a horror movie? Not often. In shows like the Simpsons, is going to church not portrayed as a very good thing to do?
The 'attacks' occur on both sides. Personally, I prefer shows that take a fair stance on religion, and not just praise it or criticise it.