Rocket Girl said:
Why would it be easier and cheaper for them to get am American copy of a game and then send it to him in Japan, when he could get a Japanese copy from Japan? And if they aren't made in Japan and it's not easier, why not still get the Japanese copy and he can have one DS and play all his games.
[As a precursor, I'm not a game developer or reviewer, so these are mostly assumptions, but assumptions that I would imagine are more or less correct.] An Escapist reviewer gets his review copies through The Escapist. The Escapist is a non-Japanese gaming site, so it works with the American and/or European divisions of a company. Therefore, Escapist employees get American and/or PAL review copies. If they wanted to get a Japanese review copy, then The Escapist would have to get one from the Japanese division. But the Japanese division probably isn't going to work with The Escapist, because it's a non-Japanese site, so it's the American and/or European division's responsibility. So, because The Escapist likely
has to work with the American and/or European divisions, Escapist reviewers are going to get American and/or PAL review copies. Now, why he doesn't just get his own copy of the game? Review copies are typically sent to reviewers early, before the game is released publicly. This is so the reviewer can have a review of the game published before the game is released to (hopefully) generate more hype, and thus more sales. And this can't be done if a copy can't be acquired before the game is publicly released.
Also note that Steven started out with the American 3DS and got the Japanese 3DS for his own, non-work-related convenience.
And if you still don't understand, then how about this: Why would the American/European division of a company get a Japanese copy of a game to send to a reviewer, when they can just say "Too bad, get him an American/PAL 3DS so he can review that version of the game."?