Soul Calibur IV - ThyView

Recommended Videos

Thyunda

New member
May 4, 2009
2,955
0
0
As a rule, sequels will never be good as the original.
Soul Calibur 4 sort of follows that rule. As in, in most opinions I have gathered, the third Soul Calibur is superior to the fourth.

Well, let?s do a little comparison.

Soul Calibur 4 is a weapons-based fighting game. Everything really revolves around one-on-one duels between characters.

General gameplay is nothing special. Press Y to hit opponent with blunt object. Press X to slap them with it. Press B to put your foot up their ass. Simple stuff, really.
There are over twenty different characters to use, each with their own style, and a number of weapons in that style. So it?s all very simple and samey. Yes there are different moves, and yes, they?re probably worth using. If you can keep your opponent in one place long enough.
Advancing from SCIII, SCIV has added a new aspect to combat. Fatalities.

Oh. Sorry. I meant Critical Finishes.

Every character has a ?Soul Gauge?. An orb next to their health bar. If they keep blocking your attacks, you harm their Soul Gauge, rather than their actual health. Knock the Soul Gauge down far enough, and you will deliver a Soul Crush. Press the right button as soon as you see this, and you are treated to a cutscene of your character beating the **** out of their character.
Always good fun.

For some reason, the Chronicles of the Sword mode is dropped from this game.
If you don?t know what this mode is, look it up. Then play it. It?s a very fun game mode. And I want it back.

It?s been replaced by something called ?Tower of Souls?. Basically, you must climb a tower. There aren?t any stairs. In fact, there?s not even a roof. It?s just a large mesa in lava. But the aim is to beat people up. Sometimes there are special conditions and environmental effects. But the point still stands. Beat people up.
Once you reach a certain floor in the tower, you can fight your way to the bottom again.
God knows why you?d want to go back to the bottom.

A feature that actually stuck from SCIII is the Character Creation. And it is far from simple.
In SCIII, creating a character was all about looks. You chose armour because it looked good. The only things that would affect your performance were the weapons.

In SCIV, however, each armour piece has a different effect. For example, the Leviathan armour may look pretty, and I chose it because it did, but it has some bad things. And good.
It boosts your attack by a fair bit, but to compensate, cuts off 50% of your maximum health. The only way I can survive in battles now is because I wield the Spirit Sword, Soul Calibur, and it gives me a 25% health bonus.
But still, I?m starting fights on 75% health, where the maximum is 200%.
The only way around this is to play on Standard Versus. But that also nullifies your weapon effects. And that makes me sad.

The versus modes have changed too. Special Versus in SCIII used to have special battlefield conditions, like Slip Out. Which was a lot of fun. Basically, the arena was like ice, and you had to kill your opponent, while trying not to slide off the arena.
That?s missing from SCIV. And that also makes me sad.

Multiplayer is well?.just like singleplayer. And that?s all it can really be described as. However, there is one key difference. In Story mode, you don?t have to deal with attack-spammers. These players choose characters like Cervantes or Kilik, and just use the same move over and over again, to the point where you want to garrotte them.

It is immensely satisfying to knock them out of their flow. Cervantes? spam move has him teleporting into the air, then coming down hard for a guard-breaking strike. I sidestepped him and swung my sword like a baseball bat.

I really can?t think of anything else to write. Really. It?s just a game where two people hit each other with various objects, and suffer from bizarrely proportioned breasts.
 

Whistler777

New member
Nov 14, 2008
529
0
0
OP, how would you say IV compares to SCII? It's the only one I have, and it's really fun...

Would I be getting the same amount of enjoyment?
 

About To Crash

New member
Apr 24, 2009
332
0
0
Whistler777 said:
OP, how would you say IV compares to SCII? It's the only one I have, and it's really fun...

Would I be getting the same amount of enjoyment?
Not even remotely close. Trust me, I played SCII until I couldn't actually feel my thumbs, fingers, and forearms, so I think I have an idea.

It seems to me the 4 seemed much more interested in the spectacle of the fights rather than control. They put so much work into making the character's clothes instead of gameplay that they turn it into a kind of interactive cutscene rather than a real game. Also, I liked it more when Nightmare and Siegfried were the same guy, and Nightmare was in one piece. Now he's in two parts with a glowing orb in his centre and it makes him look like a retard. Also, I don't know why they bother making a story out of the whole thing, each character's will end with their success when you play as them, so it makes little sense come time of the next instalment.

Anyway, I like the review, it was well written and appropriately thought out.
 

Thyunda

New member
May 4, 2009
2,955
0
0
Whistler777 said:
OP, how would you say IV compares to SCII? It's the only one I have, and it's really fun...

Would I be getting the same amount of enjoyment?
SCII was amazing. And had guest characters I could take seriously (Heihatchi and Necrid).

I always did like Necrid. What happened to him? What game was he originally from...? He fit right in with the SC cast...especially paired with Astaroth.

Oh. Yeah. No, you probably wouldn't get the same enjoyment. SCII was infinitely more playable than SCIV.
 

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,717
0
0
Thyunda said:
Whistler777 said:
OP, how would you say IV compares to SCII? It's the only one I have, and it's really fun...

Would I be getting the same amount of enjoyment?
I always did like Necrid. What happened to him? What game was he originally from...? He fit right in with the SC cast...especially paired with Astaroth.
He wasn't from a game, Necrid was made purely for SC2 by the Spawn creator.
I hated SC4, one of the reasons I give my Xbox away.

As for Heihachi I had the GameCube game, which was the surperior version so I had Link to play with.
 

PhantomCritic

New member
May 9, 2009
865
0
0
it is true though, SCIII was better than SCIV, like the character creator felt more creative back in SCIII, it also had much more interesting storys compared to the ones in SCIV. And SCIII didn't feel like a cheap attempt of product placement by Lucas Arts.
 

Thyunda

New member
May 4, 2009
2,955
0
0
SuperMse said:
Thyunda said:
As a rule, sequels will never be good as the original.
One of the biggest pieces of unsubstantiated bullcrap I have ever seen...
As a rule.

By that, I mean 'following general opinion'. I don't think I've ever seen a sequel without 75% of people coming out with how the original was so much better.