I fail to see how it does, or how it's supposed to be formulated intelligently.Malygris post=7.69102.652480 said:But when I read what the artist had to say about it and gave the thing some thought myself, I started to see what he was going for. And it makes sense.
Is it just about pointing fingers as to how people react about anything associated to 9/11?
What's the message here? Thus far, I'm only seeing a thing that seems rather terribly superficial without any useful message, no matter the convoluted underlying meaning you want to attach to this.
His own "explanation" tells me nothing about his opinion and intent. But attention he does get.
After his take on Invaders, I can't wait to see how he's going to use Defender.
I think it's a waste of time.