Did you miss the part about the single issues being an annoying anachronism that most people getting into comics wouldn't want to bother with?Jake Martinez said:I don't see how you can say that at all. If you look at the retail orders, it stands to reason that they would be ordered in terms of popularity from MOST POPULAR to LEAST POPULAR. Ms. Marvel falls in the bottom middle of that list every single month.Nazrel said:It's not that I love Ms. Marvel, I think it's just an okay book; it's that I think your basis for evaluation is flawed.
This has got to be the most objective way of determining a characters popularity. Nothing you've provided really runs counter to anything I've said. Just because a trade paperback sells well only means that there were a lot of people who wanted to buy the trade paperback, it has nothing to do with how popular the material is relative to other titles since not every title would have had a trade paperback released at the same time.
Surely this should be common sense, right?
There are three ways comics can now be consumed.
The single issues, the trades, and the digital issues; to properly evaluate the popularity of a character you'd have to take into account all of this, otherwise it'd be like doing an election poll but only canvasing the rich.
I suppose a proper comparative analysis of the trade paperbacks would involve comparing the first month of each trades release and each successive month after against each other regardless of when they were released (so long as they're released within a reasonable margin of time of each other.) though my point had been it's Vol 1 had been selling consistently in the top 50 for the last year, regardless of anything released in the interim.
Getting ahold of statistical data for the digital sales is next impossible though, they only ever give you the top sales not the numbers involved.