Star trek: Enterprise

[direkiller]

People hated it because Patrick Stewart wasn't in it. I too really enjoyed it, but because it wasn't The Next Generation people were mad.

Then explain the popularity of Voyager and Deep Space Nine.

OT: I just thought it wasn't that great of a series. Not every incarnation of a show can be successful.

voyager has 7 of 9(it was on its last leg till "scorpion" seasons 1-3 are some of the most hatted episodes of Startreck)

DS9 has Ben Motherfucking Sissco(and a very commpeling story ark)



Enterprise is considered bad because it tried drawing in the Baywatch crowd. Archer is strangely raciest to the Vulcan(i know this isn't the right term for irrational haterid of an alien but i just dont know what is right). Tupal is annoying. Archer has worse ethics then Janeway most of the time. Most of it's episodes tend to be just meh.

For instance compare
"A night in sickbay" from enterprise to "The Conscience of the king" from TOS now The orignal serise is by far silyer, but which one makes you think more? And that's why alot of older trecky dislike Enterprise it eather is pointless action or speeches less subtle then a hammer

 

[The_root_of_all_evil]

There was talk of a quantum leap movie in which they finished it off with him finally getting home, what ever happened to that?

Edit: well their is still talk of it, at least there was in Jan http://sciencefictionworld.com/films/science-fiction-films/699-scott-bakula-and-dean-stockwell-to-cameo-in-quantum-leap-movie.html

He doesn't.

End of the last series explains exactly what's going on - but doesn't - and then it finishes on the note "Doctor Samuel Beckett never returned home."

If they change that...

It won't be pretty.

 

[Dusty Fred]

Meh. Enterprise was all right, certainly not awful. The premise was interesting, the production was generally sound (like most trek fans I could never quite get past how the design of the ship mirrored the Akira-class design in almost every detail) and the episodes were sufficiently entertaining.

The problem it had, which it shared with Voyager (although arguably to a lesser extent), was that Star Trek is, at heart, character-driven. Although the Enterprise crew was inoffensive and reasonably distinctive it had no-one to rival the likes of McCoy, Picard, Worf, Sisko... multi-dimensional characters that set up permanent residence in your memory/heart.

 

[cookyy2k]

There was talk of a quantum leap movie in which they finished it off with him finally getting home, what ever happened to that?

Edit: well their is still talk of it, at least there was in Jan http://sciencefictionworld.com/films/science-fiction-films/699-scott-bakula-and-dean-stockwell-to-cameo-in-quantum-leap-movie.html

He doesn't.

End of the last series explains exactly what's going on - but doesn't - and then it finishes on the note "Doctor Samuel Beckett never returned home."

If they change that...

It won't be pretty.

It wouldn't be the first, or biggest thing Hollywood has changed in the name of a "better" film would it?

 

[The_root_of_all_evil]

It wouldn't be the first, or biggest thing Hollywood has changed in the name of a "better" film would it?

It was, and is, perfect.

If there are changes, it won't be pretty.