baggyn said:
Its cool and all but syringes are far cheaper, unless its multi-use i can't see it replacing the syringe any time soon
Of course it's multi-use. That'd be the main point of a device like this. (even the fictional version. - Watch star trek and you'll see the same hypospray being used on multiple people without stopping inbetween even to sterilise it.)
Flamezdudes said:
They wasted money on this crap when you could easily get a needle?
Seriously? People need to grow up, it's just a needle for goodness sakes...
See above. I'm fairly sure that the fact that this device doesn't physically penetrate the skin means it can be reused without the need to worry about cross-infection.
The main reason needles are disposable, is that you do not want to transfer disease from one person to another.
A device like this doesn't need to be disposable if it's designed correctly, so in fact if used correctly, this should cut down on costs, AND bio-hazard waste, quite aside from that it might be less painful.