Steam Gets Civilized

TheMadDoctorsCat

New member
Apr 2, 2008
1,163
0
0
Oh, and I pity anybody who has a less-than-stable Internet connection (that'll be the two-thirds of the UK who are either on Tiscali or BT Broadband then. Thank the good Lord for cable.) Offline mode or no offline mode.
 

Cousin_IT

New member
Feb 6, 2008
1,822
0
0
Steams great redeeming feature is it has an offline mode, so I only have to be online once. Steamworks, however, is going to get Valve in the same pile of shite that Microsoft has had to deal with with Explorer etc in the next 5-10years.
 

H0ncho

New member
Feb 4, 2008
179
0
0
I might also add that the auto-update feature of steam is particularly unwelcome on a game that is made for mods. I mean, what can be more fun than starting up steam, and then discovering that all your mods have been rendered useless by a patch you didn't want to install?
 

Flying Dagger

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,344
0
0
Korten12 said:
I somewhat agree on best vaules, some old games are a bit pricy, and Team Fortress 2 is $20 on steam and $10 in stores.
I think in a lot of cases they push up the prices of the original games and offer things like "valve complete pack" instead, bunching it with a load of other games to save you money.
Saverio said:
I really cannot wait for Valve to get put under investigation for their anti-competitive practices. They are simply bullies who make everyone else happy.
Monopolies are only shown to be bad if there is monopoly abuse. Until they show signs of monopoly abuse, there really isn't a problem.

On topic, I bought Civ 3 on steam for 75p, though not sure I want to play it, but i've spent more then that on a bottle of water...
I'm of the mind that I'd be fully justified to pirate any games I own on steam if it went down, and thus less worried about that happening.
 

t_rexaur

New member
Feb 14, 2008
135
0
0
AC10 said:
I think he means the half-life series was a flagship.

Here's the thing about Civ V. It's using steam for it's community, mod distribution and online multiplayer matching. Would you rather they used gamespy or something else? Steam filled the gap with easy to use tools that did exactly what they needed, so they took advantage of that.

I agree it's a kick in the balls to NEED to install steam (even though I love steam) but at least understand the reason for them doing this. Ideally, they would allow you to install a "non steam" version of the game that doesn't use steam at all or have any community or online features for the people who want that. Even if they did I would use the steam version.
I have to say I agree this. Back in the day I would have been rather sceptical to install steam, as AC10 says it would be like a kick in the nuts. Nowadays though, I'd happily spread my legs and take the pain, because Steam is nothing short of a godsend in terms of deals. Most of the games I now own were gotten cheap as chips from steam and the Christmas sales gave so many I'm still playing through them all. The community sections are good too, I've made many a gaming friend from the likes of Left 4 Dead and Team Fortress 2.

I also think the article is being a bit narrow minded with steam's range of games. They aren't all source based FP shooters, there's quite a few companies on board with a wide selection of games. To give an example, some games from my steam list are: Batmam: Arkham Asylum (Action), The Last Remnant and Dragon Age: Origins (RPGs), Warhammer 40K: Dawn of War (RTS) and Sam and Max Episodes 1 and 2 (Point and Click). There's literally thousands of games with a lot of choices.

Guess what I'm saying is don't knock it till you've tried it. If you really are a Civilization fan, then accept this minor irritation, you may be pleasantly surprised.
 

carpenter20m

New member
Nov 9, 2009
78
0
0
Johkmil said:
As a long-time Civilization fan, I must say that this is a *huge* step backwards. Civ is simply not a game you need an internet connection for whatsoever. About 1/3 of the time I play, I'm *without* an internet connection, and Steam requires to be booted with an internet connection before being able to turn on the off-line mode. This is shamelessly selling out those playing on laptops or the few who are without a stable internet connection.
That is not true at all. I boot up my laptop and play steam games without it being connected to the internet every single day (almost). When you open Steam and it doesn't see an internet connection, it just asks you if you want to go to offline mode...It's that easy.
 

Cody211282

New member
Apr 25, 2009
2,892
0
0
Pandalisk said:
"Experienced Points: Steam Gets Civilized"

"Some long-time Civilization fans are getting pretty steamed."

Good God, The puns man, the puns!..


As a supporter of steam i fully support this, i hope more game developers follow suit.
I have no problem with people who want to sell their games on steam, but it pisses me off when you buy the damn disc then are required to have steam to play.
 

Painted Battleship

New member
Oct 21, 2009
6
0
0
I recall being pretty miffed when I brought home Empire: Total War and Steam popped up to install it. You'd think they'd mention that on the box, wouldn't you?
 

aaronmcc

New member
Oct 18, 2008
629
0
0
I got Portal for free from Steam today. It was awesome to replay this brilliant game and even better knowing it didn't cost me a thing.
 

Acidwell

Beware of Snow Giraffes
Jun 13, 2009
980
0
0
Calhoun347 said:
Well, To be fair to the competitors, Steam has taken pages from the Impulse play book with regards to sales.

I love steam, I love valve, I also love Civilization. I have around 150 steam games, and I've not regretted the purchase of a single one. (around 3 were BAD games, but I got them for so cheap, i can't even be angry.)
True but they evolve and change steam and in general they listen to the users, and the sales are a good display of this. On the other hand impulse hasn't changed that much since they released it.

Korten12 said:
I somewhat agree on best vaules, some old games are a bit pricy, and Team Fortress 2 is $20 on steam and $10 in stores.
Well yeah they do get it wrong from time to time. A perfect recent example is: The Whispered World. 40euro on steam in the euro zone, 30$ in the US on steam. Every other online retailer has it at the proper price of 25euro. But when you can get Total War:Medieval 2 for 2euro in a sale it all balances out i think.
 

Blackbird71

New member
May 22, 2009
93
0
0
Cody211282 said:
Pandalisk said:
"Experienced Points: Steam Gets Civilized"

"Some long-time Civilization fans are getting pretty steamed."

Good God, The puns man, the puns!..


As a supporter of steam i fully support this, i hope more game developers follow suit.
I have no problem with people who want to sell their games on steam, but it pisses me off when you buy the damn disc then are required to have steam to play.
This, seriously, either make it a digital distribution, or physical disc, there's no reason to require both simultaneously.

Personally, I oppose Steam on principle. I've never installed it, or any system like it, and I sleep well knowing that I truly own all of my games. Yes, it means that I've missed out on a few games I would have liked to play, but guess what? I haven't had any trouble filling my gaming hours with non-Steam titles. As far as I'm concerned, I haven't lost anything, and the game developers who use Steam have lost my business. As long as game companies use programs and systems that will liimit and dictate the use of my own computer and purchased software, then I will continue to vote with my wallet.
 

Pandalisk

New member
Jan 25, 2009
3,248
0
0
Blackbird71 said:
Cody211282 said:
Pandalisk said:
"Experienced Points: Steam Gets Civilized"

"Some long-time Civilization fans are getting pretty steamed."

Good God, The puns man, the puns!..


As a supporter of steam i fully support this, i hope more game developers follow suit.
I have no problem with people who want to sell their games on steam, but it pisses me off when you buy the damn disc then are required to have steam to play.
This, seriously, either make it a digital distribution, or physical disc, there's no reason to require both simultaneously.

Personally, I oppose Steam on principle. I've never installed it, or any system like it, and I sleep well knowing that I truly own all of my games. Yes, it means that I've missed out on a few games I would have liked to play, but guess what? I haven't had any trouble filling my gaming hours with non-Steam titles. As far as I'm concerned, I haven't lost anything, and the game developers who use Steam have lost my business. As long as game companies use programs and systems that will liimit and dictate the use of my own computer and purchased software, then I will continue to vote with my wallet.
Cody211282 said:
Pandalisk said:
"Experienced Points: Steam Gets Civilized"

"Some long-time Civilization fans are getting pretty steamed."

Good God, The puns man, the puns!..


As a supporter of steam i fully support this, i hope more game developers follow suit.
I have no problem with people who want to sell their games on steam, but it pisses me off when you buy the damn disc then are required to have steam to play.
This i completely agree with, have no doubts in that regard.

They should have it Disc or Digital, not both, but regardless i will love steam, simply because my rural enviroment means i cannot go out and purchase Discs with ease, Steam is a god send in my eyes without it i wouldn't be able to play more modern games.

Everytime a publisher joins Steam i skip a damn heartbeat.

it has its faults but it definatley brings games to a wider audiance.
 

Enkidu88

New member
Jan 24, 2010
534
0
0
The only problem I have with Steam IS the auto-patching system. I play mods with alot of games and auto-patching usually screws it up royally. I'd prefer them to do what Impulse does and tell you there are updates and allow you to install them when your ready.
 

Pandalisk

New member
Jan 25, 2009
3,248
0
0
Enkidu88 said:
The only problem I have with Steam IS the auto-patching system. I play mods with alot of games and auto-patching usually screws it up royally. I'd prefer them to do what Impulse does and tell you there are updates and allow you to install them when your ready.
agreed, most of the time i have to do it myself. No matter, i lik the satisfation of patching my own games.
 

thunderbug

New member
May 14, 2010
55
0
0
Steam is flawed idea from the word go, its has never been cheaper, faster or easier than going to the shop in my experianced. the only steam games i have(apart from oblivion) i got by accident and basically i bought a disk which allows me to download the game i should have on disk, which is the most stupid thing ever.

not only that but unless there has been some new kind of super internet released and ive been in some kind of cryo sleep for 400years, downloadin a 6gb game takes a long time and it is much quicker to go the shop unless u live somewhere remote, like the moon or something.

Finally lol there is the price thing everyone says it cheaper but here are a few examples of games i have bought new which were also on steam. keep in mind that with these games i got the box the disk the manual etc and with the collectors editions i got lots of extra shiny bits i could touch and smell and kiss etc etc
Mass effect 2 collectors edition £40 on steam £40
supreme commander 2 (steam game unfortunatly) £25 on steam £30
dawn of war 2 ( steam game again) £20 on steam £25

dont get me wrong steam is good the people who want to use it for watever insane reason but the people who want to buy the physical game shouldnt be made to use the fat monster that is steam :)
 

Gildan Bladeborn

New member
Aug 11, 2009
3,044
0
0
Shamus Young said:
The cost of running Steam, Impulse, Direct 2 Drive, or Gamers Gate is basically no more than the memory, CPU, and hard drive the thing eats up.
I don't know about Impulse and Direct 2 Drive, but you don't actually run Gamers Gate Shamus: when you buy a game from them they give you links to a download utility and any patches/serial codes you might need, things of that nature.

And then you run said utility, wait for it to download all the files it needs to install the game, and then it launches the install process itself. When it's finished, it asks you if you want to keep or delete the installation files (in case you foresee installing it again for some reason and want to skip the probably quite lengthy download) and that's it.

All you get with Gamers Gate is the game you paid for - I'd have nothing but good things to say about the service if it weren't for the bit where their servers are in Sweden so the downloads take forever, and if the download stalls for any reason, instead of automatically retrying the connection, it will pop up a dialog box telling you the connection died and asking if you want to retry. This is very very annoying when you start an enormous download, go to sleep, and then wake up to the revelation that it stalled after half an hour and then spent all night waiting for you to click "OK".

So yeah, in exchange for not bundling any annoyances with the software you actually want it seems they provide tons of annoyance up front before it even finishes downloading. But at least there's no mandatory utility!
 

oktalist

New member
Feb 16, 2009
1,603
0
0
I bought Civ IV on Steam and hated it. So this news doesn't bother me. Civ III (which I had a pirate copy of, and later bought on Steam when I could afford $30) cannot be surpassed, and any attempt there to do is fail.