gmaverick019 said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
erztez said:
Mezmer said:
No matter how you feel about apple, the man pioneered the home computer, graphical user interface, and basically monopolized the MP3 Player, Music and Tablet markets. I salute you Mr. Jobs. Rest in Peace.
Wait, so now we give people respect for attempting to circumvent antitrust laws?
When did this happen?
Why was I not informed?
I DEMAND ANSWERS!
In this case, it wasn't an attempt at circumventing anti-trust laws; he was just such a good advertiser that he managed to corner each of those markets right at the start. He didn't actually do anything anti-competitive, he just got there first. You see the same thing currently with Steam and the digital distribution market -- it's so entrenched that the very consumers that more competition would help are digging in their heels and refusing to use the competitor's product, not because it's actually worse than Steam, but because it's coming from another company, and is therefore a different product.
steam doesn't cost an arm and a leg though...
and they don't update it every single 6 months and make you shell out even more for it.
Neither do any of the other DD platforms; I know what you were getting at, but apples to apples, please. My point was about pioneers cornering markets, not about Apple's (highly successful) attempts at overcharging technologically under-educated rubes.
erztez said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
erztez said:
Mezmer said:
No matter how you feel about apple, the man pioneered the home computer, graphical user interface, and basically monopolized the MP3 Player, Music and Tablet markets. I salute you Mr. Jobs. Rest in Peace.
Wait, so now we give people respect for attempting to circumvent antitrust laws?
When did this happen?
Why was I not informed?
I DEMAND ANSWERS!
In this case, it wasn't an attempt at circumventing anti-trust laws; he was just such a good advertiser that he managed to corner each of those markets right at the start. He didn't actually do anything anti-competitive, he just got there first. You see the same thing currently with Steam and the digital distribution market -- it's so entrenched that the very consumers that more competition would help are digging in their heels and refusing to use the competitor's product, not because it's actually worse than Steam, but because it's coming from another company, and is therefore a different product.
Damn you for being reasonable and constructing a logical argument. DAMN YOU TO HELL!!!
Ehm.
On the other hand, Steam is a piece of crap, but the other options are WORSE. I'd use Origin in a second if that shit actually had ONE advantage over steam (and no, carrying EA titles hasn't been an advantage for years now

. Same with the rest.
Though I can honestly say I don't even use steam that much. I crack all my games immediately after purchasing them. Why? Because I can, and because they generally run better after I do.
Fair enough. Have you tried Impulse or Direct 2 Drive, though? I haven't tried D2D, but I was quite happy with the two games I registered through Impulse. I don't know if it's changed since Gamestop bought it, but it used to be essentially DRM free, although Stardock was never able to get games as quickly as Valve, nor were they able to negotiate for quite as good sale prices. For all the dressing up of the DRM it does, Steamworks is still one of the most oppressive forms of it on the market.