In an article on the BBC website today, there was a discussion of a study performed at John's Hopkins trying to determine whether circumcising an already-infected male would help to prevent the spread of the virus to his partner. They found that while pre-infection circumcision can help prevent the male from contracting the disease, post-infection circumcision does not help to prevent it from being spread to his partner (they actually had to end the study early because of the risk to the men's partners). I'm not at all interested in getting into the already tried argument about whether circumcision is good, so here's what got me riled:
"The US researchers, from Johns Hopkins School of Public Health in Baltimore, say not offering the procedure to men with HIV would stigmatise them.
Other experts say it could become a "sign" of whether a man was HIV positive or not."
I may be daft, but wouldn't that be a good thing? Is it somehow unreasonable to want to be able to have a "sign" of someone having HIV (or any other STI)? Admittedly, I'd be interested in simply having some sort of card (which you have to get updated monthly) which lists your health information. But, is it bad to have a stigma, or at least identification, of communicable diseases? Especially since by the time it'd be possible to see a lack of circumcision, the guy should probably have told his partner to begin with?
Or am I just being crazy, fascist, and a little bit evil?
"The US researchers, from Johns Hopkins School of Public Health in Baltimore, say not offering the procedure to men with HIV would stigmatise them.
Other experts say it could become a "sign" of whether a man was HIV positive or not."
I may be daft, but wouldn't that be a good thing? Is it somehow unreasonable to want to be able to have a "sign" of someone having HIV (or any other STI)? Admittedly, I'd be interested in simply having some sort of card (which you have to get updated monthly) which lists your health information. But, is it bad to have a stigma, or at least identification, of communicable diseases? Especially since by the time it'd be possible to see a lack of circumcision, the guy should probably have told his partner to begin with?
Or am I just being crazy, fascist, and a little bit evil?