I've never gotten a "sugar rush". For some reason my friends don't believe this. Yes, it is possible to eat sweets and not bounce off the walls. >,>
Pretty lame, I am.
Pretty lame, I am.
I know, I'm just saying, most people don't believe me when I say I can remember that far.Kenjitsuka said:I can do that too. Isn't it just some eye muscle thing?Tim Mazzola said:I can temporarily turn off my sight. Like, I can have my eyes open, but voluntarily make my sight worse to the point where I can be almost completely blind (just seeing everything as a blur, basically, not even perceiving shapes). I always figured anybody could do this by un-focusing their eyes, but nobody I tell it about believes it's possible, so I guess they can't.
I've never thought about it as anything special.
Also, 3 years of age and being a baby are lightyears apart, brain development and memory wise...
How does this work for you... (yes, I'm being a ponce for quoting myself).Quaxar said:Alright, let me clear things up a bit. Or so I hope.
A Tachyon is a theoretical particle moving faster than the speed of light. We can't disprove that detect a Tachyon and probably never will because even if it exists it probably doesn't interact with sub-lightspeed particles. And if it does we still need bigger and better detectors.
Creating a vacuum isn't the problem, I mean you just have to suck the air out of an airtight vessel but I call BS on the "tachyonizing" part as shown in the last paragraph.
Aaaand... I'm not sure I know this photon detection experiment. Google to the rescue!
But I can help you with the ol' particle-wave-problem.
See, light is a strange thing. It's not totally wave but not totally particle, sometimes it uses features of a wave, sometimes of a particle.
For example looking at the <url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment>double-slit experiment it behaves like a wave, meaning we can see interference like when you throw two stones into the water next to each other.
On the other hand do waves need a medium to travel through (sound waves, for example, can't exist in a vacuum) but light still passes the emptiness of space.
I could go on but I think I'll leave you there for now. Though feel free to ask, I have way too many hard physic books here. I can talk about anything.
Or alternatively, go to page 4, read the long posts and... well, react how you will react.SckizoBoy said:I will immediately preface this by saying I am not a theoretical physicist.
*ahem* You do realise that tachyon research has only advanced to the point where their involvement in brane-antibrane interactions is only just being understood. Moreover, the application of tachyon fields to systems as small as a bottle of water is... non-sensical. Even current research, e.g. tachyonic fields with respect to dark energy models, run into the problem of causality resolution [1], even if prior hypotheses have been thoroughly tested. Also, despite the requirement of a series of assumptions (e.g. non-flat FRW universe etc.) entropy correction is supremely difficult and tachyonic fields must be considered alongside a myriad of other 'forces' (e.g. K-essence, dilation scalar fields) and other hypothetical models, including loop quantum gravity [2]. All of this is based upon the viability of a particular agegraphic dark energy model [3], which I personally don't like the look of. ¬_¬
Anyway, even were the entirety of the above to be proven to be real (in the mathematical sense), and most of the authors require uncertainty principles to prove probability, how (or rather, why) could it be applied to such mundane and banal things as water...?
1. Sheykhi A, Physics Letters B 682 (2010) 329?333
2. Farooq et al. (submitted 2010 - arXiv: 1003.4098v2)
3. Cui et al. Chinese Physics B 19-1 (2010) 019802
Yes, I'm trolling.
Therefore, request: cite your sources.
When you said "fleiable", you meant flexible right? How is it?let said:Hmm, I am fleiable to give myself a blowjob (if you tell anybody I know that A: you are an internet stalker because you found out who I am and B: I will kill you for telling them) Nobody knows because I don't tell people a lot for fear of masterbation jokes
Yes, I ment flexible. And I don't know what you mean by "How is it?" If you mean how does it feel, just like if somebody else was doing itDoctorPhil said:When you said "fleiable", you meant flexible right? How is it?let said:Hmm, I am fleiable to give myself a blowjob (if you tell anybody I know that A: you are an internet stalker because you found out who I am and B: I will kill you for telling them) Nobody knows because I don't tell people a lot for fear of masterbation jokes
I can do that with my left sholder, just the left one tho for some reason(I think it's and injury i got during gym when i was young and never got checked out)Lilitu said:I can dislocate (at least it looks like that) my right thumb as I wish and "relocate" it without external force.
I can do that with both hands. I suspect it may have something to do with being Ambidextrous.k-ossuburb said:The funny thing is yours is on your right, mine is on my left. Just out of curiosity, are you right-handed? Because I'm left handed, maybe this has something to do with early development.Lilitu said:Together we could fight crime and evil! Nobody could withstand the double-icky-thumb!k-ossuburb said:DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE!
Check it out, I've got the exact same thing!
![]()
![]()
I wondered whether precognition was actually true because if it is I definitely had it when i was younger. I remember one time when I'd been talking to a guy at school and he really annoyed me. Now he'd never phoned me before but I was lying in bed one Saturday morning and the phone started ringing and I thought to myself "Go away Patrick" and I knew it was him. I heard my Dad answer the phone and when i got up around an hour later he told me that Patrick had phoned. I've had similar experiences though they've kinda stopped now.binnsyboy said:I don't get hangovers, whatsoever.
I have random moments of precognition.
Examples: It was easter, at my grandparent's, and my cousin, who was too young to actually remember numbers properly was counting her easter eggs. A random number pattern came into my head, something like "1,2,4,8,12" a few seconds later, she counted out those exact numbers (and was then corrected by my sister)
I was in a car, with a drink balanced on the dashboard (fortunately it had a lid) I was playing on my gameboy when I, half aware of what I was doing, stuck my hand out. A few seconds later, we went over a bump and the cup fell safely into my hand.
I was speaking to my friend on msn. I asked what level his character was on an RPG game. I just murmured to myself "32", and that was the number he posted.
I was on holiday with family and friends. It was dark, and we were at the docks. We heard one of the kids running along the docks, right to where the jagged rocks were. Me and another guy sprinted along the docks, but there were these local fishermen untangling some line. It was stretched across the width of the dock in a tangled mess and we couldn't see for the dark. My friend came to a halt, but I jumped on a split reaction and went through a small gap in the net a few feet in the air.
Right. That was exactly what I meant about light. Whether or not it is a wave or a particle depends on HOW it's observed.Quaxar said:Heh, meet super string theory.Raognerrrm said:I can imagine 7 dimensions.
This one is very hard to prove.
It also makes my brain hurt.
Alright, let me clear things up a bit. Or so I hope.mikev7.0 said:Okay I thought a Tachyon was a subatomic particle that can break the speed of light but only in a vacuum? So how are you creating a vacuum for all this "tachyonising" or how do you do it? I also thought that a research group from Austrailia named KANGAROO (not kidding, that's what they call themselves) did discover it and although it's true that the human eye (when adapted to the dark) can detect a photon, I don't think you would see something traveling faster than 186,000 miles per second. Lastly, did you mean whether light is a wave or particle depends on HOW it's observed? Sorry that first bit confused me. This is why Wikipedia is NOT equal to a library.Scabadus said:How, exactly, do you go about 'tachyonising' a bottle of water? Because I doubt it's very healthy for you, that high you're feeling may just be radiation poisoning.GamerPhate said:I held 2 cells and drank some normal bottled water that I had tachyonized for a few hours.
Oh dear we've made a whoopsie. Tachyons are quantum particles, existing both as physical objects and electromagnetic waveforms depending on if they're observed. That being said, even while existing as particles they don't travel by speed in the same way we do, they exist as probability fields. However even with that, we as a race do have the ability to detect quantum particles, both using our eyes (light photons are quantum particles) and devices like photometres and colourometeres. Tachyons, on the other hand, violate many principles of current universal physics theories and very likely can't be detected because they don't exist.GamerPhate said:Tachyon particles are SOOO small and go soo fast (THROUGH the earth's molicule gaps at NEAR the speed of light or faster) we don't have machines sophisticated enough to measure these particles. Perhaps when they built something smaller than a nano-meter or something that day will come.
Of course you'd know all of this if you just read the wikipedia page [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon], which I really recomend you do in future before irradiating yourself or wasting thousands of [your currancy here] trying to detect something that's already being looked for by qualified scientists with millian dollar budgets.
A Tachyon is a theoretical particle moving faster than the speed of light. We can't disprove that detect a Tachyon and probably never will because even if it exists it probably doesn't interact with sub-lightspeed particles. And if it does we still need bigger and better detectors.
Creating a vacuum isn't the problem, I mean you just have to suck the air out of an airtight vessel but I call BS on the "tachyonizing" part as shown in the last paragraph.
Aaaand... I'm not sure I know this photon detection experiment. Google to the rescue!
But I can help you with the ol' particle-wave-problem.
See, light is a strange thing. It's not totally wave but not totally particle, sometimes it uses features of a wave, sometimes of a particle.
For example looking at the <url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment>double-slit experiment it behaves like a wave, meaning we can see interference like when you throw two stones into the water next to each other.
On the other hand do waves need a medium to travel through (sound waves, for example, can't exist in a vacuum) but light still passes the emptiness of space.
I could go on but I think I'll leave you there for now. Though feel free to ask, I have way too many hard physic books here. I can talk about anything.
That makes a trio of icky-thumbs together with k-ossuburb.warrcry13 said:I can do that with my left thumb. Laos to a lesser extent my right thumb, but not really as well and to do it I have to push it. I'm right handed, are you by chance left handed?
We gonna rule the world! ;Dk-ossuburb said:DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE!
Check it out, I've got the exact same thing!
![]()