As far as reverse engineering the cells, it would take nano tech to do. And really, they are such a simple device, breaking it into peices would yield nothing. It is siliconized glass arranged in a specifical molecular arrangement, so breaking it wouldn't be handy unless I could re-fabricate the process. You couldn't see the arrangement with a microscope anyways, need something more precise. But yes, I am highly skeptical about these products, but the results that they yield and unexplainable otherwise.SckizoBoy said:I have no doubt that the crystals have an effect. However, I am sceptical about the effect being a result from tachyons. If I had one of those crystals, I'd instantly smash it to pieces and start feeding it through every bit of analytical instrumentation kit I have access to (and that includes an SS-NMR machine).GamerPhate said:Nice troll attempt, and I welcome people that are hesitant to believe any of this. As far as REAL scientists, they all think Tachyons are still Sci-Fi related, so therefor, everything they say about it is all hypothetical. Like I mentioend before, they still don't have machines small enough to capture these particles to measure them. The only way we can even start to question their existance, is the effect they have on living material. Therefore, I can give you a list of tests you could try on your own if you had a cell to try to prove that they don't exist. In fact, I NEED research from a skeptic to TRY to prove me wrong. Every time I have done a test, or researched another persons's results, they all give nearly identical results.
I' will briefly recap an example. Take a rose bush, pluck two flowers with stems off of the bush, this way you have two identical test subjects. Next, we take normal tap water and then we take some tachyonized tap water, and basically put one of each type with each of the plants. The plant with normal tap water dies like they normally do, and in just 2 to 3 days is wilting over near death. The flower in the Tachyonized water lives to be 7 to 9 days on average. That is nearly 3 times the length of life in the death stages. But evertime I see this test, its always the same. If you did this test too, and saw the results, you would be baffled like I was. Then you start to realise that maybe there is something to this. But again, that is why I test, do research, and seek others intersted in doing their own tests. I need data from various sources, and the only way to get it is to find the open minded people that haven't already closed their mind and think they know how the world works. But at the same time, I must have that level of skeptisism there so that when the test is concluded, there will still be some level of doubt. That is good! In fact, I WISH I could prove that they didn't exist, if I could do that, I could give up on this whole thing, and not worry about it. But the fact that I can not find a failed test so fair only makes it worse for me, as each time I gather results, it becomes harder to disprove that they have an effect. Seriously, I NEED someone to disprove me with tests, so I can wash my hands of this whole thing. But again, the more I try to disprove they exist, the more I do the opposite.
Tachyons are subatomic/quantum particles that travel at or faster than light. Are we agreed? Thus far, physicists know of no particle with mass that can travel faster than light in undistorted space. Even without mass, tachyons cannot interact with matter in 'real'-space due to lacking frequency. Any and all interactions they have with constituents of undistorted space is energetic.
However, this isn't the half of the problem I have. The main issue I take is producing tachyons, and from what you say, effectively an indefinite source of them. Theoretical physicists thus give this question to materials scientists, who are grounded in the three dimensions that we know and love, with all space-time relationships as hunky-dory because they know nothing they handle anything that moves particularly fast. With these prerequisites, I find it difficult to believe that they can manufacture something that can emit particles that don't exist in our three dimensions, and in potentially any number of different time-frames. Manufacturing, activation, predicting behaviour and control of such an artefact is (I believe) impossible for us, with current technology. *shrug*
That the manufacturers maintained the operation mechanism as a trade secret and felt the need to trademark the word 'Trachyonization', you'll forgive me if that leaves me feeling dubious.
You did do some research, but you need to look up what an SOEF field is first. As far as these emitting particles, that isn't really the case. They are more like a funnel or antenna that directs and concentrates the already existing Tachyon energy that is constantly bombarding us from space 24/7. You are getting Tachoyons constantly, but in small doses, and their effects are diminished due to the level of EMF emmitted by modern day electronics. The cells condense the Tachyons into such a focal point that they can push through these EMF fields and even repel them.