The point isn't the amount of time he WILL serve, it's the amount of time the media will REPORT he might get at maximum. This is a warning shot. Anti-gaming pundits are letting us know that they're going to come after our industry big-time (and any small-timers breaking laws who they can use to make us look bad), since they know they can get away with it. And the everyday Joe on the street who isn't a gamer will read the headlines, think "Oh noes! Piracy is always 100% wrong no matter what!" and the negative image of gaming and the modding community will remain.sallene said:many of the responses in this thread make me facepalm. Facepalm so hard I nearly knock my brain out the back of my head.
Congratulations, you have been sucked in by the sensationalist terminology of the media. Have a cookie.
as has been said before and been looked over numerous times by damn near everyone, the maximum sentence is 10 yrs. "maximum". It is damn near improbable if not entrirely impossible he would get that for this crime, let alone if this was a first offense.
Hows about we all just simmer down and turn off our "OMGWTFBBQDAMNTHEMANPIRATESYAY!!!!" alarms and wait to see what additional information is released and what actually happens to the poor lad.
I almost have more of a problem with the media coverage of these game-related incidents than the actual arrests.
I'm not suggesting he should get off completely, but even 5 years as a maximum sentence would be way extreme. Unless he was running some sort of cocaine factory-esque piracy production line or something. And wearing white suits and smoking Cuban cigars. And owning a tiger.