Study: Don't Use Wi-Fi Near Your Junk
- Thread starter Greg Tito
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Sperm start dying the second they leave your body.
This can't be real, any biologist in this field would know that.
This can't be real, any biologist in this field would know that.
Interesting. 29 Healthy men does not a study make. You would need to repeat this with hundreds, if not thousands of men to get any meaningful results. And then it would just be numbers indicating a group effect and have no bearing on actual results regarding individual humans. Also, take into effect that sperm is protected inside the body which would change the results completely.
Ahhh, science. I remember when we used to have picnics together and talk about your very specific process... those days seem behind us now that any Tom, Dick, or Harry seem to think they understand you. I miss... US! *openly weeps*
Ahhh, science. I remember when we used to have picnics together and talk about your very specific process... those days seem behind us now that any Tom, Dick, or Harry seem to think they understand you. I miss... US! *openly weeps*
Also, this. Sperm may only live for at maximum, a few hours outside a body. Many swimmers start dying within a few minutes.OriginalLadders said:
bullshit if that was the case we'd all be sterile by now you are constantly bombarded with wireless signals just look at how many wireless networks are visible at all times.
like the so-called evidence that homoeopathy works i think this will fall flat on it's balls when it hits peer review and double blind study
if its not in respected science publication like science magazine or new scientist it is probably bollox
like the so-called evidence that homoeopathy works i think this will fall flat on it's balls when it hits peer review and double blind study
if its not in respected science publication like science magazine or new scientist it is probably bollox
The only way I would give a damn about this study's findings, is if it said anything about damaging the sperm factories.
Having a few million sperm die is no big deal since I passively create billions over weeks, but if the factories were damaged, then that might cause a bit of concern.
Of course, there is still some question about the validity of this study, like all studies involving "THIS TECHNOLOGY HURTS THIS".
Having a few million sperm die is no big deal since I passively create billions over weeks, but if the factories were damaged, then that might cause a bit of concern.
Of course, there is still some question about the validity of this study, like all studies involving "THIS TECHNOLOGY HURTS THIS".
I hate kids anyways. They're loud, they puke, they cost you money, and my family has a pattern of one kid in each generation being bugf**k crazy. So my lap top is staying in it's designated area right over my junk, and there is nothing anyone can say to stop me.
I remember when people in school used to say "mountain dew will lower your sperms count" and my response was always "and this is a bad thing?" If using a laptop is an effective male form of birth control, then I'll get excited. No more pregnancy terror for me!
I don't know who the man is in your avatar but his face is appropriate for your post and it's cracking me up.CosmicCommander said:
*Looks over at his router less than a foot away on his desk*
Fuck...well I wasn't planning on having any kids but damn, pretty sure all the little me's are fried at this point. Guess I don't have to worry about that problem at all now.
I doubt that the use of laptops and WiFi actually would have a lasting effect on the testes, perhaps a period of lesser fertility, but not permanent sterility. At least, I hope.
the radio waves would probably interferes with the genetic structure of the cells, causing them to mutate a bit and die.Orks da best said:
you're contradicting yourself there: you say that they proved it, while the scientists, whom you quote only a few sentences later, say that it MAY decrese fertility.Greg Tito said:
You might not see it as a problem, but it's these exagurations that make the Escapist an unreliable news source.