Wolverine18 said:
The truth is only insulting if someone wants to be insulted.
That's usually what people say when they enjoy phrasing the "truth" in inflammatory ways... often, notably, without being asked.
This after you made specific mention of the "Sheldon complex?"
I didn't actually use those words so don't use quotes.
Perhaps you're not familiar with the
multiple ways in which quotation marks work? Yes, they can be used for a direct quotation, but they can also be used when a phrase is being used in a special or uncommon way -- in this case, I took a couple terms from what you said and I put them together into a term that summarizes the idea. The Chicago Manual of Style could tell you some about it.
I mentioned that Sheldon does exhibit some identical behaviors to what this guy sounds like he is doing in hopes he would see the same flaw in others that he can't see in himself and thus move to adjust behavior.
You mentioned, among them, that Sheldon thinks himself superior to others. I can agree -- he is constantly issuing uninvited corrections on people that, however accurate, are generally seen as rude, presumptuous, and, well... very Sheldon. You're doing the same thing, equally uninvited.
Of course I have a bit of a superiority complex. Most successful people in my profession do. See I'm not afraid to admit my problems, and I'm not afraid when they are pointed out to me.
It's so noble of you to embrace your "flaw" when that flaw is finding fault in others. What a sacrifice you've made. But just because you're okay with your flaw doesn't mean you should run about inflicting it on others -- regardless of your awesome profession.
All you've done is take someone's story, draw some pretty out-there assumptions from it, and then use those assumptions to be what amounts to an intellectual bully.
Your claims are of course without foundation, mine had a foundation in his very post. And as you can see, I'm not afraid to admit my weaknesses.
So, what, your "weakness" is that you're too awesome to ignore the weaknesses of others? That's like those idiots in interviews who, when asked their greatest weakness, say things like, "I'm just too punctual/attentive/motivated sometimes!"
But regardless, your claims had even less foundation than mine. They were assumptions, however informed you might think they are. You don't know the guy. All you know about him is what he said in the post, and text does not accurately convey everything about a person.
There was a point in my life where I was a little picked on whiner. I got over that around puberty. I'm sharing life experience.
No, you're not. If you were sharing, you'd have told a personal anecdote. You skipped that part, and went straight to telling him who he was and how it's wrong and what he should change. That's not sharing.
I would if they hadn't specifically come here to broadcast their weaknesses, thus inviting a reply.
I notice you haven't followed your own advice by responding to me btw.
He didn't invite your reply. He told a personal anecdote. You could have replied asking for clarification, additional details, or other tidbits that could have guided the conversation in that direction for the
both of you... but you didn't. You decided you know what's best, so you skipped a few steps (his steps).
Also, my reply? Yeah, you did, in fact, invite it. He was just telling his own story. You were bullying someone else with your super-awesome-professional brain. That's certainly grounds for butting in. And now, as you're obviously not the sort that endures such awful weaknesses as "empathy," I can see this will do no further good, and I'm butting back out.