Sucky Portrayal

Recommended Videos

VicunaBlue

New member
Feb 8, 2009
684
0
0
I'm not talking about specific NPC's, but rather things like the boars roaming in WoW, or RTS units. I'm wondering if anyone else has noticed very bad jobs done on representing them, according to the backstory. My example is the Reavers from starcraft, and while they are supposed to be the highly destructive protoss death-bots, I just find them so freakin' adorable I can't use them in battle.
 

HalfCaptainRob

New member
Oct 12, 2009
18
0
0
Hm. Well. Basically anything that's super-destructive in most games. Especially an rts. Just to balance the game.

The Alien (see: Xenomorph) in any AVP rts. Why? Because according to everything about Aliens, one Alien is equal to ten marines. As in, one Alien can slaughter ten marines. But in an rts. Nope.
 

Gyrefalcon

New member
Jun 9, 2009
800
0
0
I guess there is often an issue with bits like animals ALL attacking you ALL the time! Elder Scrolls Games are that way where nearly everything tries to eat you. Yet animals like wolves are generally shy creatures in normal circumstances. Having hordes of beasties and monsters chasing you to town is just ludicrous.

Now if they came after you when you were wounded or on foot instead of ON A HORSE I could probably buy it more. Or if they hunted you when the weather turned, such as winter seasons, I could also enjoy it more. It would be more exciting and more of a treat than all of them after you all the time.

I also get a little miffed at birds that are not touchable in games. Or the hilariously circling (literally) gulls in City of Heroes. Wouldn't it be cooler to have some game birds you could use the bow on? Or a hawk you could send out to catch small birds or game in the outdoors? (I think Turok at least had a companion hawk. Looked good, too.)

But, honestly, these are petty gripes on otherwise good games. I did enjoy some titles that let you combine animal parts to make new battle critters. Those ones cared about working skunks, porcupines, and wolves. Heh. Nothing like a bear with a turtle shell to liven things up.
 

Raven's Nest

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
2,954
0
41
Misconceptions about creatures?

Mudcrabs aren't naturally agressive, they just get off on attacking anything that moves...

It over-stimulates their neural pathways between their feet and the knee. This causes it to reach orgasm whenver it see's something it can attack...
 

VicunaBlue

New member
Feb 8, 2009
684
0
0
imahobbit4062 said:
HalfCaptainRob said:
Hm. Well. Basically anything that's super-destructive in most games. Especially an rts. Just to balance the game.

The Alien (see: Xenomorph) in any AVP rts. Why? Because according to everything about Aliens, one Alien is equal to ten marines. As in, one Alien can slaughter ten marines. But in an rts. Nope.
AvP Extinction? Yeah, that game was sucky.
Yeah I saw that... It looked like it was only halfway through production when they finished it.