Summer School - Part I

MovieBob

New member
Dec 31, 2008
11,495
0
0
Summer School - Part I

Summer wasn?t a particularly enjoyable crop, but at least it was an interesting one where even the failures had something to teach us. For example?

Read Full Article
 

castlewise

Lord Fancypants
Jul 18, 2010
620
0
0
I must be one of the 4 people in the world that like the Riddick movies. Even the second one, although I was frustrated that they seemed to have built this whole mythos and never explained any of it.
 
Jan 12, 2012
2,114
0
0
castlewise said:
I must be one of the 4 people in the world that like the Riddick movies. Even the second one, although I was frustrated that they seemed to have built this whole mythos and never explained any of it.
(In before people start shouting at you to read the Dune books) I liked the Riddick movies too. Vin Diesel is kinda ludicrous, but they're not bad by most definitions.
 

Ickabod

New member
May 29, 2008
389
0
0
You're not alone in thinking that this summer you got tired of the rides. The problem to me, is the movies and the sameness of them all. Too many of the movies just look like they were written by an accountant where you know the entire movie before even walking in the theater.

Another question, would Iron Man 3 have made as much money if it released in mid July as opposed to the first week of May? Sure I liked the movie, but would it have done as well had audiences already gotten their fill of explosions for the summer. Granted it had the best twist of the summer, and had a solid plot, so that does help.

And finally, blockbuster popcorn movies are supposed to be fun. Marvel and Disney seem to have figured this out, but everyone else is just too serious for their own good. Man of Steel, Star Trek, (something else), etc... They were all too self important for themselves. I think that's what Marvel/Disney have figured out, they're just movies, while you can touch on real world issues, don't make them the issue. In Iron Man 3 the issue was terrorism but the movie was about Tony Stark/Iron Man.

I don't know, you're the critic, I'm just trying to add to the conversation on how I felt this summer.
 

Mr Fixit

New member
Oct 22, 2008
929
0
0
Thunderous Cacophony said:
castlewise said:
I must be one of the 4 people in the world that like the Riddick movies. Even the second one, although I was frustrated that they seemed to have built this whole mythos and never explained any of it.
(In before people start shouting at you to read the Dune books) I liked the Riddick movies too. Vin Diesel is kinda ludicrous, but they're not bad by most definitions.
Well I guess that makes me number 3 then, because I liked them too & i'm really looking forward to the next one.
 

Elijah Newton

New member
Sep 17, 2008
456
0
0
MovieBob said:
That's not good news for when his blockbuster clout really does dry up and serious projects are wary of casting him for fear of residual Tonto jokes tainting their prospects.
May I be the first to coin the term 'Tonto taint' for this phenomena? There are entredres which I think do justice to the stinker. In the future when it looks like Depp has been cast to wear a funny hat and draw attention from an otherwise phlegmatic endeavor we can caution that his Tonto taint is showing, so look away. Look away!

Captcha was 'silver lining'... ok, perhaps the horse was very good but I can't imagine it made Lone Ranger worth watching.


Thunderous Cacophony said:
castlewise said:
I must be one of the 4 people in the world that like the Riddick movies. Even the second one, although I was frustrated that they seemed to have built this whole mythos and never explained any of it.
(In before people start shouting at you to read the Dune books) I liked the Riddick movies too. Vin Diesel is kinda ludicrous, but they're not bad by most definitions.
Sure, I'm with you guys. The first did a lot with a small budget. The second was was... well, not weird, just not the movie I expected, though given my low expectations this was totally a value added feature. Also, I'm faintly mystified / impressed that Dame Dench was in it.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
But whereas the expensive Down had a disappointingly average debut at the boxoffice, the low-budget Olympus opened earlier in the year and did tidy business for itself. Lesson learned: Get there first.
Although Olympus (according to wikipedia anyway) had the bigger box office, it was only by $30 million. If it had had the same box office Down had it still would have been a financial success because it had less than half the budget. I wouldn't say that the lesson is so much get their first as it is, don't have a budget that you aren't sure you'll be able to make back.

That or don't have shitty trailers. Because I'll be honest, Of the trailers that were aired on TV for the two, I would have pegged White House Down as looking substantially less interesting and even completely stupid. But that may be because I have trouble taking Channing Tatum seriously as an action star.
 

vid87

New member
May 17, 2010
737
0
0
Minor additional topic - Ryan Reynolds should pretty much never be the lead actor: any time he's prominently featured as the main character in a mainstream movie, said film dies a horrible death (RIPD was one of the big duds this year and Turbo didn't do much better). It seems when he's the sidekick or not the focus of audience interest (Croods, Origins Wolverine, The Proposal, Safe House) or in a lower budget film he does a bit better. Thing is I don't feel he's a bad actor - he just has really bad timing and taste in projects.

Predicted topic - Horror is doing really, really well. Obviously they have for a while, but I'm wondering if there's a more interesting trend being expressed through the successes of Purge and Conjuring.
 

Rawberry101

New member
Jan 14, 2012
136
0
0
Bob did you say Iron Man 3 was the best in its trilogy?

Bob wat r u

"The best of its own trilogy by far"
-Bob 'Moviebob' Chipman

Bob

Stahp :'(
 

Pyrian

Hat Man
Legacy
Apr 21, 2020
1,399
8
13
San Diego, CA
Country
US
Gender
Male
It walks a deft tightrope between utilizing archetypal characters while effortlessly breaking Hollywood rules about the function of women and people of color in "big" movies.
Using archetypes I see, breaking rules, I don't see. The major characters under discussion? Tough black police chief who dresses down the protagonists a lot and the asian martial artist sidekick? These are ancient stereotypes.
 

MovieBob

New member
Dec 31, 2008
11,495
0
0
I can't wait for next week, where he will ***** about Nolan. AGAIN! Because of course he will.
 

Sanunes

Senior Member
Mar 18, 2011
626
0
21
I have actually been feeling the same way you did about this summer for a few years now, everything seems to be the same as everything else and to me that is because every movie is like every other movie. It reminds me of how I felt about Oblivion, I was able to guess almost every single plot twist in the movie based on the trailer alone.

As far as Riddick goes, I wasn't demanding it but now that its coming to theaters I will probably go see it for it reminds me more of Pitch Black then Chronicles. That and I tend to be more interested in a movie that tries to be different then a clone of everything else out there which seems to make up a good chunk of the available movies.
 

Bestival

New member
May 5, 2012
405
0
0
castlewise said:
I must be one of the 4 people in the world that like the Riddick movies. Even the second one, although I was frustrated that they seemed to have built this whole mythos and never explained any of it.
Everyone I've talked to about is as completely fucking stocked about the new Riddick movie as I am. Seems only reviewers don't like it!
Also, Chronicles Of Riddick was always meant to be a trilogy. It was sold as a trilogy, and if Diesel had to get all blackmaily to get them to continue it, that just shows that Hollywood, once again, wasn't keeping its word. That's excluding Pitch Black btw, which was just a character introduction type of tale.

It's still probably going to bomb though, it's been too long since the first movie. It will also be rated R, apparently The Underverse is kind of a naughty place.

Anyway, between that stab at the only movie besides The Hobbit that I'm interested in this year, and saying Iron Man 3 was the best in the trilogy, I don't think this guy has any clue what he's talking about. Glad I never read any of his other stuff.
 

MovieBob

New member
Dec 31, 2008
11,495
0
0
It's a shame Pacific Rim still lost money even as a success in China as I would like a prequel (or what Pacific Rim should have been about in the first place THE START OF THE WAR!)

The problem with China is that in most countries 50% of ticket sales go to the syudio but for chinese ticket sales only 25% go to the studio so unless China starts co-funding the films being a success there doesn't help as much as it could for films that don't do well in the US.
 

Lionsfan

I miss my old avatar
Jan 29, 2010
2,842
0
0
Pyrian said:
It walks a deft tightrope between utilizing archetypal characters while effortlessly breaking Hollywood rules about the function of women and people of color in "big" movies.
Using archetypes I see, breaking rules, I don't see. The major characters under discussion? Tough black police chief who dresses down the protagonists a lot and the asian martial artist sidekick? These are ancient stereotypes.
Let's not forget the film spent the first half deciding if Asian Girl and White Guy were gonna hook up or not.

Pacific Rim was an ok film, not great, and certainly not ground breaking
 

Sovereignty

New member
Jan 25, 2010
584
0
0
Kumagawa Misogi said:
It's a shame Pacific Rim still lost money even as a success in China as I would like a prequel (or what Pacific Rim should have been about in the first place THE START OF THE WAR!)

The problem with China is that in most countries 50% of ticket sales go to the syudio but for chinese ticket sales only 25% go to the studio so unless China starts co-funding the films being a success there doesn't help as much as it could for films that don't do well in the US.

I'm not sure where you get your numbers, but Pacific Rim DID make money. It almost doubled it'd budget iirc.


And that was more so thanks to the great showing over seas
 

bificommander

New member
Apr 19, 2010
434
0
0
I'm surprised Pacific Rim did so well in China, considering their Jaeger gets so pathetically trounced while fighting two-on-one in their first on-screen battle.
 

MovieBob

New member
Dec 31, 2008
11,495
0
0
Sovereignty said:
Kumagawa Misogi said:
It's a shame Pacific Rim still lost money even as a success in China as I would like a prequel (or what Pacific Rim should have been about in the first place THE START OF THE WAR!)

The problem with China is that in most countries 50% of ticket sales go to the syudio but for chinese ticket sales only 25% go to the studio so unless China starts co-funding the films being a success there doesn't help as much as it could for films that don't do well in the US.

I'm not sure where you get your numbers, but Pacific Rim DID make money. It almost doubled it'd budget iirc.


And that was more so thanks to the great showing over seas

Pacific Rim's production budget was $190 million so it needs a box office gross of $380 million to break even as the studio gets 50% while the theater chain gets the other 50% except for China were the stuido only gets 25%.

Current gross excluding China is $288 million so the studio gets $144 million.

China's current gross is $110 million of which the studio gets $27.5 million.

So the Studio has so far made $171.5 million on a production budget of $190 million.
 

MovieBob

New member
Dec 31, 2008
11,495
0
0
It's weird to say I'm a little at odds with Bob on some of this stuff. Who wants Riddick? Well..me! I recently sat down and rewatched CoR to remind myself why it was good or bad. Honestly I still enjoyed it. It's definitely not deep or thoughtful but it was very pretty and entertaining popcorn scifi flick. In particular the ending was very cool. Its kind of like the Nerd version of F&F. Actually no thats exactly what it is even in VD's mind. Its junk on screen with aliens. Were Leviathan or Deep Star Six timeless classics like Abyss? No but they were fun to watch and films like those should keep being made.

Everyone I know is pretty excited to see the trilogy conclusion.

Iron Man 3? bleeegh boring rehash of the first 2 with nothing learned or any emotional depth. They should have just used the plot from the comics scene for scene Ezekial Stanes story and action were great, why mess with it?

Yeah pain & Gain was awesome. Man Olympus has fallen was really bad It was nonstop action and somehow it just put me to sleep. I think Gerald Butler does not and never will have bruce willis's screen presence.

No, Johnny Depp will be fine mainly because Pirates 4 made like a billion dollars or some unreasonable some of money for a movie I can't remember a single scene from.

Thats about it I agree with the rest of the article.
 

Keyes

New member
Oct 16, 2012
3
0
0
Na, I'm the Riddick lovers. I've loved the Riddick movies since I was a little kid. Once I found out a third was being made I couldn't stop smiling. Plenty of folks I've talked to have said that they can't wait for it to hit theaters either. So why the major downplay on Riddick, I don't know, guess reviewers just don't like 'em.