What are you on about? Cases of collateral damage in the protests against police violence last year? Yes, some of that collateral damage caused harm to innocent people, but it's not like police violence in America or ethnically targetted police violence in America just suddenly became an issue out of nowhere in 2020 that just needs some more time to be sorted out. It has been a problem for decades, likewise there have been calls to reform it for decades. Accordingly, the nation had decades of time to address these issues and enact these reforms, before the frustration over these issues which, may I remind you, is the murder and abuse of innocent citizens by the very institution allegedly meant to ensure their safety, would escalate. But that didn't happen, therefore it escalated. You can't beat your dog for years on end and then act like the victim when you get bitten.
Yes those killed by looters etc I guess were acceptable casualties too?
How many bodies does the revolution want? How many is too many?
Why was stealing trainers and TVs somehow seen as fighting the Police again? What was the plan to take those items to deny police the ability to buy them?
Some of the issue is no matter what is done some people aren't happy. Cameras were brought in, what happened? People complained the cameras were unfair because it biased the court by showing the actual events.
People yell that non-lethal equipment isn't acceptable to use so Police then have to use lethal stuff to deal with issues because they're in trouble anyway.
Yes Police brutality is an issue what shouldn't be considered an issue is Police shooting dead a gunman who has already killed people and is shooting at them
It's not about revenge, it's about prevention. I don't want to live under a dictatorship that sees me as an accesory in a Jewish conspiracy,
I'd say be careful who you side with then
Councilman’s FB video insists family of Jewish billionaires “controls the climate.”
www.thedailybeast.com
that kidnaps my neighbours because it views them as vermin to be exterminated or that sentences my friends to slave labour for deviating too much from some arbitrary standard of normalcy or decency.
Oh you mean like Kamala Harris's prison reforms?
I've become aware of society threatening to head in that direction in the middle of the last decade, when I was in my early 20s. The subversion of western politics and western media by the ideological succesors of 20th century hitlerism, promoting, with a thin layer of plausible deniability, an ideology of ethnic and cultural supremacy, leader cult, imperialism, religious and ideological fanaticism and a frightening willingness to commit violence to subjugate liberal democracy under that ideology.
You might want to ask who it is who is claiming Orcs are actually like black people etc too.
I can try to dissect that funny little cartoon, pretending it's a worthwhile use of my time, if that makes you happy. One of its core messages seems to be that the views of the generation fighting in World War 2 would seem unrelatable to many antifascists in the 21st century, considering that generation wasn't around to experience over half a century of scientific and social progress regarding civic equality,
yet some have and would still be yelled at and called fascists.
a clearer understanding of gender identity, a greater accepance for homosexuality and so on and so forth. That is probably not wrong. It's not really saying anything either. People in the 2020s have different views than people in the 1940s, if anything that makes it even more laughable that the enemy they're fighting has hardly changed and if anything, only doubled down on the delusional ideology it had followed when it was first crushed in the 1940s. There is the gotcha about equating antifascist activism with fascist activism on the account of using authoritarian measures, even if one is doing it out of unprovoked aggression and an intention to assume power over a society it considers an easy target, while the other one is taking these measures in self defense to fend off that aggression, correctly recognizing it as an existential threat.
Defence..........
yeh we're in a world where speech is considered horrific violence by beating people over the head with a bikelock is acceptable.
Using bear mace is unacceptable but shooting the person in the face is acceptable defence.
Carrying a Flag? Horrible act of violence. Beating said person near unconscious? Totally acceptable defence
On that note, of course the modern antifascist strawmen are depicted as being dweeby and effeminate, one even has a stereotypical gay lisp, which just happens to not only be a recurring feature of fascist propaganda, but also a mildy amusing indication about the weird insecure obsession with masculinity and the performance thereof that fascists have. A consistent feature of their rhetoric and their preferred insults towards people with opposing views is that they tend to attack their masculinity. ******, cuckold, tranny, that ridiculous "soyboy" shit they had going for a while. "We are tough and manly, they are all a bunch of girly sissies". Throwing civilized society under a bus because their daddy didn't love them.
Maybe because quite often they do turn out to be dweebs lol
Oh and as for attack on masculinity etc, why is it incel became such a preferred insult again by left wing people? Oh right because calling people Virgin fell out of favour and kept being called out as childish