well as for including the big guy in the T5; I'd go to my previous post that Terminator is Schwarzeneggar. no point ever making a Terminator TV Show/Movie without him IMO. but thats coming from an admitted Terminator fanboy and Arnold fanboy. Def prefer this option to a CGI Arnold.martyrdrebel27 said:i figure after nailing down sentient AI and TIME TRAVEL, they might have the technology to handle anti-aging robot flesh. i've never read a terminator book (honestly, this is the first i've heard of such things) but this all still kinda avoids my original point that including arnold at all seems stupid to me. if i were someone of power within the making of this, i wouldn't have allowed it to happen.Mr Ink 5000 said:I think one of the books (going back a long time since I read them so I'm probably wrong) went through the issues Skyney had with stopping infection due to yhe flesh not being part of an immune system. So in that cannon its not that outrageous.martyrdrebel27 said:this movie would benefit by cutting out arnold altogether. the shoehorning of "aging flesh robot" just to include him reeks of stupid.
The T800 with its Model 101 skin is made for infiltration, it wouldn't behard (for me) to believe that there are variations on this model to help with this. 101 Young, 101 Old, 101 Aging etc
but, maybe someone disagrees.
As its a possible reboot, we may see T800's without the 101 Model. 102's 103's etc, and the public will be more accepting of other actors playing the Terminator role. I know I wouldnt like it, but I'd me more accepting of it
I think most the Terminator books were late 90's, not sure. Maybe Skynet failed Biology class?