renegade7 said:
I'm not surprised EVE Online (my favorite space sim, along with its upcoming tie in EVE Valkyrie) wasn't mentioned, but, really, no FTL?
I think FTL deserves really special mention among space games because it focuses on being concise and easy to get into and easy to play (but not easy to win, not at all...) and providing just as much entertainment as more complex space games while still being far simpler.
That being said, I love space games, and need to check out Freespace 2. Also, if you haven't heard of Elite: Dangerous, look that up now.
TheMemoman said:
I agree. FTL has provided me with some of the most memorable and immersive space faring escapades!
Also, considering the vastness of space, I'm more inclined to think that real life space battles would be decided more on cunning tactics than on dog-fighting maneuvers.
To me... these games are not space sims. These are fighter games set in space. Eve online is one of the best space sims around. Everyone thinks its combat sucks but honestly thats what space warefare is all about... Its not about dog fighting maneuvers. Its more battleship vs battleship combat. Ftl is also a great space sim. no dogfighting just targeting weaknesses. startrek online.. again.. no real dogfighting... just manuvers that still take forever in your ships. Kerbal space program is one of the best space sims. It might be funny and goofy and not a combat sim but once you get into space it still uses space physics.
If you look at the article about the 4 science mistakes star wars makes. the fighter combat is one of them.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/scienceandtech/11956-4-Science-Mistakes-Star-Wars-Episode-VII-Needs-to-Fix.2
again.. this is why i do not classify any game with aerial fighter mechanic as space sim. They are just glorified ace combats set in space. now get me a fighter game with actual space physics...then we'll talk.