It's funny that you frame the white scientists as douchey. A lot of what they're saying sounds like rants from pseudoliberals on a message board talking about how backwards conservatives are.
Amen. The entire "holier than thou, I'm brilliant and everyone else is some poor rube we need to civilize" is exactly the sort of thing hardcore liberals do while supposedly portraying any perceived enemy as the judgmental, smug one. Case in point, talk to a smoker and one of those do-gooding anti-smoking types, and see which one acts like the douchey scientists.Urameshi13 said:It's funny that you frame the white scientists as douchey. A lot of what they're saying sounds like rants from pseudoliberals on a message board talking about how backwards conservatives are.
I know this was even at the time considered a bad movie but is this seriously the sort of thing that passed for horror in the '50s? A spooky creature murders people to some bombastic orchestra piece?Callate said:So our monster is a tree stump that spends most of the picture carrying people around and dropping them while the brass section does its thing?
...Can't imagine why this didn't work!
RJ Dalton said:"and to hell it can go."
I love it!
Excellent point. This "flipping" is something that seems to go unnoticed. Bob doesn't realize that his commentary reflects and augments the very cancer that he seeks to expose. He points out, for instance, that the heroes are "white people" -- thus, with a single pregnant word, divides the world into "white people" and "black people" -- but doesn't follow the thought long enough to realize that this is, in itself, a racist comment; as if it doesn't proceed from an already racially marred conscience.LysanderNemoinis said:While the movie definitely had racist overtones, I find it funny that things have more or less flipped. If the movie was done today, all the villains would be white (and probably members of the military and/or businessmen), they would be there to infect the natives with poison for shits and giggles, and the heroes would be the natives using tribal medicine and whatnot to kill off the creature. And if a white or American character was a hero, they'd have to immediately side with the natives and go all Dances With Wolves within five minutes of being introduced.Lonewolfm16 said:While the 1950s were certainly a racist time, I actually kinda like the theme of westerners bringing science and modern medicine and having to fight ancient tribal religion and tradition along with semi-xenophobic distrust of outsiders. Especially since there are regions of the world where "traditional medicine" is as commonly used as actual medicine, to say nothing of homeopathy and faith healing back here in the west.
How many people thought that burning the mummy shambling after them was a good idea? Let's face it horror movies of this period depended on the majority of the characters being totally clueless.Hutzpah Chicken said:I've heard of this movie before, either through James Rolfe or Svengoolie. Being men of 1950's movie science, wouldn't they first think that the monster is an evil tree and that wood is combustible? Who would think to shoot a knife in a tree before burning it?
If you think this is bad you should see "The Creeping Terror" (1964). While it walks faster then our killer tree it looks worse...like a killer carpet. There are times you can actually see the actor's feet in that get up.Hazzard said:Is this seriously meant to be scary? I can't imagine how this ever scared anyone outside of a jump scare from sudden movement, or the closest this tree thing can do.