I have no idea. None.Staskala said:I'm a bit confused now, could someone help me out here?
This episode was an ironic jab at all the people who have no idea what they're talking about demanding "science" (as if there's some sort of homogenous group of "scientists") to do completely uneconomic, wasteful and downright unreasonable things, yes? This wasn't actually serious, yes? Because I'm not too sure anymore.
OH, now a jetpack like THAT, where it's not spewing exhaust or whatever that stuff is directly on your behind, that would be awesome!Father Time said:It'll shoot out something at high speed and that will provide thrust (yeah I should've said thrust and not lift, sorry about that).MB202 said:How's that work?Father Time said:Not all Jetpacks need to shoot fire, just something that can provide lift.MB202 said:Also, about jetpacks, how are you going to solve the problem of having your pants and underpants burned off?
Speaking of which:
Oh and they had a jetpack on Penn and Teller Tell A Lie that used hair bleach. I can't find a clip of it though.
I stopped reading when you used the wrong your.BgRdMchne said:You're life will be a lot better if you take off the rose colored glasses and accept that this world is shit and that science is no longer about innovation and advancement, merely profit and finding better ways to put dumb YouTube videos on a telephone.
See the problem with this is that many researchers are employed by the government and/or Academia (Universities)and not directly by a pharmaceutical company. The government is generally doing it for non-profit, and Academia is usually doing it to boost reputation to attract more students and grants. In either case your idea about there being "no money in curing disease" breaks down. The only way such a theory would be true is if there was some elaborate conspiracy theory where pharmaceutical companies were in control and halting research. That just makes far to many assumptions to be a credible theory.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:Given the behavior of the average human flying cars are out; we already have people afraid of planes being hijacked the last thing we need is a car being stolen for the same purpose. Or for that matter drunken people in flying cars. Jetpacks reasonably out. Humanity as a whole is not ready for personal flight. Ideological differences with some nuts, parts of the world that are still barbarians(points outside his window at Texas). As you can see a lot of the world is not ready for personal flight; even with restricting licenses.Father Time said:You don't know these thingsBgRdMchne said:You are never going into space.
You will never own a jet pack.
Your car will never fly.
HIV will not be cured in your lifetime.
Cancer will not be cured in your lifetime.
The common cold will not be cured in your lifetime.
Don't these things bother you?
As for disease curing there is not much money in curing a disease. Treating is over long term has money therefore that is probably all we will get.
My GOD You have the best job ever...kingmob said:I'm actually a 'space guy' and in my daily work the biggest problem is that not all those in 'team science' are in it for this reason :\ Seriously, a surprising number of people is in it for the paycheck and the tax benefits (I train astronauts).
Depressing? I know...
But I will consider your input for the next discussion![]()
Thank you. It's been stealth edited now.TheEnglishman said:I stopped reading when you used the wrong your.
There are no man made fusion reactors. Fusion is the process of new element been formed by compressing another until the atomic structure of two atoms are combined into one and the excess is fired out as radiation. Gold for example is the result of iron that has undergone fusion. The end result however is very similer to nucular power, which is based upon the use of elements that have undergone an incomplete fusion and are still expelling their excess atomic contents.unlimitedwin said:Fusion technology (same reaction that powers the Sun (and Ironman for that matter...)) is the current main hope for achieving this efficiency, but we are still MANY years away from seeing fusion reactors successfully scaled down to manageable sizes.
Just exactly this. Usually I'm a big fan of bob, but this was awfull.Madrak the Red said:I usually hate doing this, but I feel I just have to:
Bob, please don't do this. It makes me sad. As soon as I saw the title, I though 'I sure hope he doesn't ask for a goddamn jetpack'. And then he went and did it. Needless to say, it made me die a little inside. Why don't you have one? Because they're impractical and incredibly dangerous. They have short runtimes, and technology does not exist to allow them to be much longer. Once again, as is often the case with these 'why don't we have x' scenarios, perfectly plausible theory is defeated by engineering, and our actual current ability.
Number two: growing steaks. No large scale infrastructure exists to do this. People like the way things are. People don't buy GM food, they aren't going to jump on this too quickly. It is a technology in it's infancy. Give it time, you sound like a child moaning because things aren't happening quite as fast as you like.
Number three: Space travel. I agree, it's a mighty shame that space programs are getting cut all over the place. I want to go to Mars as much as the next guy. I want Star Trek to be as real as much as the next guy. But unless some fairly major overhauls in the fundamentals of physics take place, it isn't going to happen. I'm sorry (and I really am) but it just isn't. Not within your lifetime, anyway.
Also: a scientist who lies is no longer a scientist. As people have said, you do not falsify data. You seek the truth, and the reason. Doing what you propose would have the potential to discredit the entire scientific community. Which would be really, really bad. You for sure do not want people to stop listening to science.
Number four: the many different shapes and sizes of dogs is due to a long, long period of selective breeding, complete with health problems that come with it. It wasn't a process of picking out genes or whatever (which is super difficult in controlling things like size of a very complex mammal, by the way). To do it with other animals would require a similar process, one with millions of animals taking many years. And a rather brutal process at that. And then let's not forget the genetic diseases that come with any pure-breed. I do not personally know, but the genome of a dog may support the differences in phenotype that can be exhibited. Such differences may not be possible with other species (granted, this is somewhat conjecture, but it is still possible).
So please, Bob, think before you speak next time. To me, a some-what educated scientist and engineer, you sound unabashedly ignorant and demanding. Granted, there is the possibility that this was a joke, and I'm sure people will urge me to take it as such. But please, do a little reading up before you start.
Yep....Though I don't agree with 'extinct'. Cows will never go extinct as there is whole religion that would never let that happen. You bet there would be a lot less of them about. People advocating animal rights are perfectly aware of this by product and are quite happy about it. Nice try...Kumagawa Misogi said:ph0b0s123 said:Point 2. Meat. Thanks Bob, have been saying this for years. Yes, I don't eat meat now, but 'meat substitutes'. But would so go back to eating meat if this was done.
And it solves two issues, not having to kill animals for meat and not having to torture as many animals for medical testing. Only the most fundamental animal rights person would still have a problem after this was invented...
Point 3. Space. So true...
Overall great episode.
You do know all the farm animals would then go extinct right? Since no one is going to pay the food bills if there is no money in it.