The Bland Side

Recommended Videos

The Bandit

New member
Feb 5, 2008
967
0
0
Furburt said:
The Bandit said:
Very good article. Except for the idiotic Transformers mention. Yes. You're cool for not liking Transformers. Shut up about it. It came out five months ago.
Plan 9 from outer space came out 50 years ago and people still talk about it as a bad movie.
Comparing Transformers to Plan 9, or even to Batman and Robin, is ridiculous. It's not a Oscar winner. But, it wasn't the worst thing ever. It's just the typical fashionable nonconformist bullshit that runs rampant across the Internet. No different than hating Halo or America. If something is popular, it has to be condemned. And it's boring.

All that aside- even if Transformers is as bad as Plan 9, mentioning it in this article was pointless. It added nothing to the discussion. It distracted from it.
 

matrix3509

New member
Sep 24, 2008
1,372
0
0
This was a great article. God, how I fucking hate the concealed racism of all these "Thank God For White People" movies. Whats worse is that so many people don't see it.
 

matrix3509

New member
Sep 24, 2008
1,372
0
0
The Bandit said:
Furburt said:
The Bandit said:
Very good article. Except for the idiotic Transformers mention. Yes. You're cool for not liking Transformers. Shut up about it. It came out five months ago.
Plan 9 from outer space came out 50 years ago and people still talk about it as a bad movie.
Comparing Transformers to Plan 9, or even to Batman and Robin, is ridiculous. It's not a Oscar winner. But, it wasn't the worst thing ever. It's just the typical fashionable nonconformist bullshit that runs rampant across the Internet. No different than hating Halo or America. If something is popular, it has to be condemned. And it's boring.

All that aside- even if Transformers is as bad as Plan 9, mentioning it in this article was pointless. It added nothing to the discussion. It distracted from it.
Moviebob uses Transformers all the time as an example of everything thats wrong with movies today. Its no different from comparing the Godfather Part 2 as everything thats right with movies. Its a perfectly usable reviewing tactic. Every reviewer in this world has movies that absolutely can't stand.
 

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,717
0
0
MICHAEL: "I never had one before."
MRS. TUOHY: "What, a room to yourself?"
MICHAEL: "...A bed.

Holy shit thats bad.

RTR said:
Hey Bob, do you think there's a way to make corny/cheesy dialogue like the bits you mentioned work?
Yeah, when the film knows its tongue is firmly in its cheek, take Commando for example... its a pile of crap but somehow its fondly remembered for its cheesyness.

"LET OFF SOME STEAM, BENNET!"

OT, I doubt I would like this film regardless of its credentials as epic storytelling, the subject matter I find insipid, the whole from rags to riches sportsman' story.

Possibly because i'm no fan of the subject matter at hand, if it was a film about my nations favourite past time such as smoking or going on strike then I might enjoy it. (i'm French btw)
 

Yoda25

New member
Dec 5, 2009
1
0
0
Hey Bob,the film is based on a True Story. Therefore your arguments are pointless. This is not fiction. This is the real life in your country now. The poverty and racism are usual things.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Yoda25 said:
Hey Bob,the film is based on a True Story. Therefore your arguments are pointless. This is not fiction. This is the real life in your country now. The poverty and racism are usual things.
Someone missed the whole point of the article.
 

malestrithe

New member
Aug 18, 2008
1,815
0
0
And, of course, it pulls the cheap screenwriter's trick of deflating obvious criticism by placing it in the mouths of "bad" characters: "Is this some kind of white guilt thing?" coyly asks one of Leigh Anne's bitchy friends, (take THAT meanie critics pointing out that it's just another "thank heaven for white folks" pander-fest) while the real story's sole note of controversy - the Tuohys were financially connected to the college Oher eventually signed with - is here raised only by a "mean" investigator whose interrogation makes Michael sad.
This is something that I've always hated about some movies. I cannot stand it if movies are self aware. It was kind of cute when Scream did it, because it kind of worked in that one. Now it seems that any film that is inherently racist needs to have a level of self awareness in it, where one of the characters exists solely to deflect racist criticism.
 

ccesarano

New member
Oct 3, 2007
523
0
0
I think a good example of working a true story into film is October Sky. In the book Rocket Boys, Homer's recounting of the events, there was no such level of confrontation between he and his father. However, that very same confrontation was a central point of the entire film. There were a few other modifications thrown in there.

However, the actual purpose is still the same. Even if things aren't going your way, amazing things can be accomplished as long as you have the will to continue on. It's one of my favorite films of all time because it is so massively inspirational. Homer trying to be his own man while simultaneously looking to make his Dad proud is something most males can relate to (Hell, it hits home for me pretty much every day). Even if you cannot personally relate to it, that conflict can be recognized as human and develops tension throughout the film.

So, it's possible to take a non-fiction story and make it entertaining. In fact, I guarantee you that most non-fiction films are modified for the sake of, well, entertaining people.

Yoda25 said:
Hey Bob,the film is based on a True Story. Therefore your arguments are pointless. This is not fiction. This is the real life in your country now. The poverty and racism are usual things.
Do you really think the events unfolded precisely as they had in the movie? In fact, wouldn't it still be more interesting to get the ideas and thoughts of the "unfortunate black person" instead?

I haven't seen the film myself, only the trailers, and it looked like your typical sappy feel good film (which isn't necessarily bad, but it is clearly derivative junk masked to look artistic). However, reading this, I guarantee you it has one purpose in the end. To use Sandra Bullock's character to stand on a soap box and shout "Hey! White people! This is how you SHOULD feel and act!". As MovieBob said, Sandra Bullock's character is primarily driven by her sudden change in outlook on the poor ghetto people. Which, now that I think about it, is a pretty politically incorrect term, but that IS how this apologetic white guilt bullshit really is. "Oh those poor ghetto people...they are so unfortunate".

It tries to be progressive and tries to make people think, only it's a subject of the very lack of thought itself. D-Mite has a deeper analysis in fewer words [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlKL_EpnSp8] of the urban ghetto than this film ever will, which is absolutely hilarious.

The film probably could have been better if it stuck to just trying to be inspirational, but from the sounds of it the purpose isn't that anyone can become something from nothing. It's "oh, those poor ghetto people. Shame on you for not wanting to give them your tax money!". Which just feels so stereotypically liberal-Hollywood it makes my scrotum shrivel.

Irridium said:
The same thing happened with The Dark Knight, I'm not saying it sucked, it was an amazing movie, but I doubt it would have gotten the same amount of attention and praise if Heath Ledger didn't die.
TRUTH! [http://www.gamertagged.net/gamelandetc/index.php?strip=33]

MovieBob said:
(James Cameron still owns that one, plus four or five others)...
Last I heard he was still interested in taking on Battle Angel Alita. From what I know that was his big anime-to-live-action passion.

Honestly, while I don't get into Cameron as much as a lot of other people do, he makes a good sci-fi action flick. I'd totally watch an 80's sci-fi anime done by him.
 

malestrithe

New member
Aug 18, 2008
1,815
0
0
Yoda25 said:
Hey Bob,the film is based on a True Story. Therefore your arguments are pointless. This is not fiction. This is the real life in your country now. The poverty and racism are usual things.
And this has what to do the point of the article? The article is about how movies were made in the studio days, about how producers would say things like, "You know, this script is good, but it needs a puppy," and about how some people are used only because they were safe and marketable. Sandra Bullock is a safe and unremarkable actress who was probably used only because Julia Roberts was unavailable.

Sorry, but this movie is not addressing the racism issue. All it is doing is white wash the real discussion. It gives the real racists cover by allowing them to do things like, "see if we sponsor a black child like this woman did, we are no longer racist.

Real life stories do not mean that the movie is automatically good by default. There are certain things that cannot be turned because they take some real life event and water it down to something that next to nothing. The Tonya Harding story took a rather unremarkable story and turned it into something more frivolous. The story of the "miracle on ice" is a lot better than the movie "Miracle."

This movie is one of this sports movies for adults that seem to be the rage right now.
 

UtopiaV1

New member
Feb 8, 2009
493
0
0
Ahhh, that's right Bob, let it all out. Deep breaths now. Let all the bile out, you'll feel better...

I agree wholeheartedly with everything you said, but no-one who isn't an internet dwelling nerd, much less anyone of any significance (as in, the film makers), will read your article.

You have preached to the choir. These "films" will continue to be made. It's a horrible situation (art being slain by the rich), but nothing will change.

And for that, i weep.
 

ben---neb

No duckies...only drowning
Apr 22, 2009
932
0
0
Nimbus said:
Very interesting. Can you recommend any movies that shows what happens when the writer gets ultimate creative control?

Also: Do try to be careful. If you keep putting this much information into your articles, people might actually learn something.
Please, no, if that happened I'd have to stop reading them. Urgh, learning, the very idea of it pains me.
 

Smokescreen

New member
Dec 6, 2007
520
0
0
Pretty well said.

What's interesting is that Sandra Bullock is a producer of the film.

Not the great evil genius you were expecting, eh?
 

tsfkingsport

New member
Mar 5, 2009
17
0
0
I really hate when a movie dumbs down social concepts this important. The first step to solving a problem is identifying and learning about the problem itself and this film butchers the idea of racial introspection.

Just wondering what do you think of Crash and can you say of some movies that actually did a really good job with depicting racism and race relations?
 

agrandstudent

New member
Nov 23, 2009
56
0
0
It seems to me that the video game industry is facing the same problem. It's all producer driven. If you read any article about what it's like to be a game designer they all mention that they have very minimal input on what game is being made if any. That is why we are seeing nothing but "hardcore" games like safe FPS games, squeals, and sequels of safe fps games. These are the games the producers know will make money not the games that the designers wanted to make. Maybe with game design being taught in college now we will get our own version of "Auteur Theory" and designers who embrace it outside of indie development.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
oliveira8 said:
Yoda25 said:
Hey Bob,the film is based on a True Story. Therefore your arguments are pointless. This is not fiction. This is the real life in your country now. The poverty and racism are usual things.
Someone missed the whole point of the article.
Because they didn't read it.
 

Arcane Azmadi

New member
Jan 23, 2009
1,231
0
0
theultimateend said:
oliveira8 said:
Yoda25 said:
Hey Bob,the film is based on a True Story. Therefore your arguments are pointless. This is not fiction. This is the real life in your country now. The poverty and racism are usual things.
Someone missed the whole point of the article.
Because they didn't read it.
Or alternatively, because they're just a fucking idiot. It happens. Occam's Razor still applies.
 

Jsnoopy

New member
Nov 20, 2008
346
0
0
Wow I'm really glad that I decided to rent "In The Loop" from Blockbuster tonight rather than go see that. Guess I'll just have to wait until "In The Air" comes out before I go to any movies in a movie theater now.
 

teknoarcanist

New member
Jun 9, 2008
916
0
0
How about this:
Could it be time to move away from directors, even, into the next era of film-making; that is, creator-controlled? Films directed by their screenwriters? Writers developing enough nuance as media-age Renaissance-men to make the medium their own? Are we already DOING this?

See:
Clint Eastwood
Wes Anderson
Charlie Kaufman
Spike Jonz
Spike LEE
TARANTINO
M. Night Shyma--hangonItakethatback
George Lu...hmm...
The Wachowski Br...oh...wait...

I'll admit I'm not sure about the legs on this idea, but I'd be interested to hear your two cents.
 

HobbesMkii

Hold Me Closer Tony Danza
Jun 7, 2008
856
0
0
MovieBob said:
This is such a time, since "evil genius" (especially the "evil" part) is the only description I can offer of the mindset that looked at Michael Lewis book "The Blind Side: Evolution of a Game" - a book tracing the seismic shift in American Professional Football strategy and position-hierarchy following the arrival of Lawrence Taylor in the early 1980s in tandem with the life story of NFL pro Michael Oher - and declared, "This will be a great star-vehicle for Sandra Bullock!!"
I'll toss this out there. They actually declared "This will be a great star-vehicle for Julia Roberts!" who in turn then told them "No, it fucking won't." And then they said "I wonder if Sandra Bullock is too old to be in movies..."