IBlackKiteI said:
Yeah but generalisations suck. They aren't all like that, and its probably a minority considering how massive the COD playerbase is.
Also, keep in mind they aren't douchebags because they play CoD, they're douchebags because they ARE douchebags. Stick 'em on another game and they'd probably be the same.
Yes, generalisations suck, and I'd bet money that the
majority of CoD players are relatively decent folks. But they have a higher proportion of douchebags because CoD is inherently douchebag friendly. If BF3 plays exactly like CoD and the next CoD game plays exactly like BF3 is likely to, then I bet you that the majority of douchebags will go to BF3. Because it's a douchebaggy kind of game. Doesn't make you a douche for playing it, but you can't deny that if CoD wasn't as douchy as it is, you'd have less douchebags.
Aeonknight said:
Except that my experience with CoD on both Live and PSN says that the whole stereotype is grossly exaggerated. over 70% of the time no one even says anything. Thus it skews your experience, because the only time you do hear anything from the players is that obnoxious brat.
The intelligent types are usually quiet, because they're there to just play. No one hops on CoD to discuss politics, religion, or current events. They get on to play a game. Just like any/every other playerbase out there.
Unfortunately, you're working on false assumptions there... this is a case of "rotten egg spoils whole basket" syndrome. CoD has a higher proportion of obnoxious brats than most games, which means you encounter them more, but it also has much quieter decent folks who could otherwise offset the obnoxious brats. Combine the two, and you have a much more unsanitary community... even if the majority remain relatively decent people.
I stick with my original point. As a whole community (and not counting closed clans or whatever, because they're not really IN the community), CoD is a less pleasant experience than most of the other shooters I've played.