Yep, 'cause they express sexist/racist sentiments. That's what sexism is. A sexist opinion expressed by someone who doesn't mean it is still a sexist opinion.The-Traveling-Bard said:Are these pages truly racist/sexist?
Um, yes? Yes yes yes. To say that "Girls deserve to be rape" is definitely sexist. Once again: You might not mean a sexist thing that you say, but it's still a sexist thing.The-Traveling-Bard said:Even facebook pages saying that "Girls deserve to be rape"[...]
Are these pages truly [...] sexist?
No it doesn't. Some people think that women can't work on cars because they're genetically unsuited to that kind of work. That's not hatred or anger, it's just ignorance about women's competence, but it's still sexism. So sorry to have to say this, but you don't seem to know what the word "sexism" means. Also, you have way too strict rules to determine which sexism you consider to be "real" sexism.The-Traveling-Bard said:Remember sexist COMES FROM A HATRED/ANGER TOWARDS THE OPPOSITE GENDER.
I'm not saying that people are ganging up on female posters, but a vast majority of posters are attacking females in general. There's a lot of women hate on here right now, even if it's not confined to attacking specific postersRyotknife said:ive been noticing an exact opposite trend, as evident with how rarely people gang up on a female poster regardless of the topic or what they said. Granted, I assume it was meant as a joke, but once again people usually take things seriously, and it wasn't this time.Lionsfan said:Sure this guy only speaks for himself, but lately there's been a pretty clear anti-female trend from a lot of posters on the EscapistDead Century said:Pardon me, but is that in reference to the OP or the site? Because I can assure you that they do not speak for anyone but himself/herself. He's just one man/lady/muppet/potato/etc. Anyway, back on topic. It's absolutely fine to make jokes among friends. Traveling-Bard, that kind of logic doesn't quite work on the internet. Tone is very difficult to get across. And everyone reads it differently. Statements are taken at face value.Phasmal said:Seriously Escapist.
The only female poster whom I saw the forum gang up on in the two years ive been here was gunsmithkitten during her....expose....on japan. And even that was extremely light compared to equivalent offenses by male posters.
not going to point fingers, but recently we had a female poster make a scathing post in a...controversial topic that would make even sexist old men slack-jawed...or pop a boner im not sure which one. Not a single damn thing was said.
Well there is obviously a lot of tension/hate/criticism regarding feminism (Anita being the easiest example), but there is a lot of hate in the other directions too on here.Lionsfan said:I'm not saying that people are ganging up on female posters, but a vast majority of posters are attacking females in general. There's a lot of women hate on here right now, even if it's not confined to attacking specific postersRyotknife said:ive been noticing an exact opposite trend, as evident with how rarely people gang up on a female poster regardless of the topic or what they said. Granted, I assume it was meant as a joke, but once again people usually take things seriously, and it wasn't this time.Lionsfan said:Sure this guy only speaks for himself, but lately there's been a pretty clear anti-female trend from a lot of posters on the EscapistDead Century said:Pardon me, but is that in reference to the OP or the site? Because I can assure you that they do not speak for anyone but himself/herself. He's just one man/lady/muppet/potato/etc. Anyway, back on topic. It's absolutely fine to make jokes among friends. Traveling-Bard, that kind of logic doesn't quite work on the internet. Tone is very difficult to get across. And everyone reads it differently. Statements are taken at face value.Phasmal said:Seriously Escapist.
The only female poster whom I saw the forum gang up on in the two years ive been here was gunsmithkitten during her....expose....on japan. And even that was extremely light compared to equivalent offenses by male posters.
not going to point fingers, but recently we had a female poster make a scathing post in a...controversial topic that would make even sexist old men slack-jawed...or pop a boner im not sure which one. Not a single damn thing was said.
Yes.The-Traveling-Bard said:If you're a female reading this. Get off the computer and get me a sandwich.
^ Now by that statement many people will label me as sexist.
But am I truly sexist?
Oh yes.The-Traveling-Bard said:Even facebook pages saying that "Girls deserve to be rape" or other things like "All blacks are niggers"
Are these pages truly racist/sexist?
Its both.The-Traveling-Bard said:are these pages driven by a desire to see a group of a certain community oppressed or this dickheads just being dickheads? Come on are you seriously telling me you can't tell the difference between a jerk and someone who is genuinely racism/sexist/whatever?
It does.The-Traveling-Bard said:A person making a sexist/racism/ mark does not mean they're sexist
In my opinion you have a terrible sense of humor. And you can be a better person by being less sexist.The-Traveling-Bard said:I make sexist remarks all the time.
But that doesn't make a sexist. My remarks don't come from a deep anger/hatred from women it comes from because I have a difference sense of humor. And that does NOT make me less of a person.
Oppression big or small is still oppression and a characterization of a much larger problem. It should be fought on all fronts.The-Traveling-Bard said:If you want to fight against REAL sexism and REAL racism. Please fight against these people.
I think you should develop a much larger degree of introspection and understand why being an 'asshole' should not be appreciated in any case. A large degree of those people you speak of are not just 'immature' young people, many of them are in fact grown men, what is their excuse?The-Traveling-Bard said:Not some asshole who is being asshole for the sake of being a asshole.
I think this is why I have no respect for majority of feminist and equal rights fighters because at least on the internet.(Also in my experience) They seem to attack EVERYONE who even makes the slightest remark. Are you seriously going to tell me the real issue on sexism is some 14-16-18 year old making a sammich joke?
If you say horrible things expect a reprisal. Free Speech works both ways. I would argue that trolling is used as an excuse to say awful things without having to have your awful ideas demolished by more sensible people. All the while you can stand on a petty pile of self induce notion of grandeur while ACTUAL racists and or sexist read your words and nod their heads in agreement.The-Traveling-Bard said:No. No. No. No.
Please grow up, and stop acting like anybody who makes even a slight sexist statement is a sexist person We live in a age where trolling is very wide spread and people will say horrible things because they can get away with it.
She is expressing that she is worried that she could mess it up do to ineptness? The remark being a form of internalized patriarchal notions of cooking I guess?The-Traveling-Bard said:In fact.. my girlfriend actually just texted me this.
Me: Go cook it yourself.
Her: I can't! ;-;
Me: Why not? D:
Her: I like it on the grill. Grilling is a man's job!
... is she really being sexist, or is she just being a smartass?
Well yeah of course?The-Traveling-Bard said:Remember sexist COMES FROM A HATRED/ANGER TOWARDS THE OPPOSITE GENDER.
Did she say this out of hatred towards me?
No. She didn't.
Context is important. People seem to forget that its the people who say the awful things in the first place are the problem, not the people addressing them. You can say anything awful any not 'mean' it but it doesn't matter because its still an awful thing to say.The-Traveling-Bard said:Learn some fucking context people and stop throwing words around like your throwing pennies in a wishing well.
Well obviously raspberry, that can't even be a serious question.Sunrider84 said:FINALLY, someone I can agree with who is not sitting on a high horse, looking down on people who don't agree with them. (This goes for both sides, just to be clear.)maffro said:You're confused, I think.
Sexist is a state of being. Someone who is sexist/racist tends to pigeonhole people based on these attributes, gender/race, usually through negative generalisation, though not even necessarily negative. You may assume all blacks can run super fast, which is a racist generalisation, even though many would believe it's a positive assumption and supported by the predominance of god-tier black sprinters. And this doesn't have to mean hatred/anger, by the way. Plenty of people think other people are great, as long as they stick to what they're made to do.
-Ism, on the other hand, is employing and communicating these techniques. No, your girlfriend wasn't being sexist, but she was employing sexism to communicate a point. My secondary school was very diverse and integrated racially, and no-one had an issue employing racism for humourous effect, based on the shared knowledge that no-one was actually racIST. If you're employing racism/sexism anonymously, there's no reason for people not to assume you're racist/sexist in turn.
Depending on context, there's nothing inherently wrong with racism and sexism, though I'd have to say there was with being racist and being sexist, which are very distinct.
You deserve a cookie. Which one do you want? Raspberry or blueberry?
Chances are if you unironically say something sexist, you are sexist.The-Traveling-Bard said:Please grow up, and stop acting like anybody who makes even a slight sexist statement is a sexist person.
That's not an excuse to let people get away with being dicks.The-Traveling-Bard said:We live in a age where trolling is very wide spread and people will say horrible things because they can get away with it.
Saying "my girlfriend is ok with it" doesn't excuse the fact that saying sexist things publicly is WRONG. That's like saying "I'm not racist because I have a black friend." That sort of logic doesn't add up.The-Traveling-Bard said:In fact.. my girlfriend actually just texted me this.
Me: Go cook it yourself.
Her: I can't! ;-;
Me: Why not? D:
Her: I like it on the grill. Grilling is a man's job!
I like the blueberry ones =(maffro said:Well obviously raspberry, that can't even be a serious question.
Everyone was a bit grumpy in that thread. I dunno, I see the subcatagories as basically mix-n-matches where you pick what you want and run with it. Creating your own name just doesn't seem academically validRealitycrash said:..To which we have people bickering about which sub-category is which, and which group represents the 'true' category and which do not, and so on. That's why I also claimed 'And any disputes are settled by me, and if you disagree, you are WRONG. Go found your own group'. Hey, I know almost anyone will accept these three claims (except those against positive-discrimination, but that doesn't necessarily make them sexist.), which was also my point.
In all honestly, I probably could have handled it better, true. It was late at night and I was being dramatic.
Humans are naturally geared towards generalisations. We make assumptions based on the limited information we have, I don't know I'f i'd call this Racism.maffro said:You may assume all blacks can run super fast, which is a racist generalisation, even though many would believe it's a positive assumption and supported by the predominance of god-tier black sprinters.
What exactly are you trying to say here?Ikasury said:okay i'm an 'Uber-Female', i like to consider myself a 'better person' then most of the 'chicks' out there i know that seem to be the culminating representation of what being 'woman' is and i wholly disagree...
I don't see how choice has anything to do with what I'm talking about.Kaulen Fuhs said:Long hair is a choice. Being black is not. Do you see why generalizations are not equivalent due to that stipulation?wulf3n said:Humans are naturally geared towards generalisations. We make assumptions based on the limited information we have, I don't know I'f i'd call this Racism.maffro said:You may assume all blacks can run super fast, which is a racist generalisation, even though many would believe it's a positive assumption and supported by the predominance of god-tier black sprinters.
Say the only time I'd seen men with long hair was at heavy metal concerts, then one day I bump into a guy with long hair and automatically assume he likes heavy metal.
Does this make me a bad person?
Yet if I were to do the same with the Black sprinters I'd be considered racist.
Ultimately you're not judging your assuming, and you're assuming based on previous experience.Kaulen Fuhs said:One you judge for a fashion choice, the other you judge for the amount of melanin in their skin.
Making jokes are one thing.The-Traveling-Bard said:snip
... Pray tell.. What are some of the other differences you're referring to here?wulf3n said:Besides you're very naive if you think the only difference between a white person and a black person is melanin.
After thousands of years of evolution within completely different environments there's bound to be many genetic differences.chikusho said:... Pray tell.. What are some of the other differences you're referring to here?wulf3n said:Besides you're very naive if you think the only difference between a white person and a black person is melanin.