The Escapist Final Fantasy Timeline

Safaia

New member
Sep 24, 2010
455
0
0
I remember when that linkshell fought PW for 18 hours straight. It was kind of legendary. Oh I remember when I cared about FFXI. SE pretty much kicked me out the door with the level increase since I really did not want to grind to 99.

Also chiming in about missing titles.
 

Vortigar

New member
Nov 8, 2007
862
0
0
The only thing weird about this list is the My Days as King entry. It seemed like they were shooting for a list of the numbered entries plus some events and leaving the spinoffs out up until that point.

Overall, this is just a basic entrypoint list for someone who isn't that engaged in the franchise. Sure there's more but if you put everything on there you're going to scare people away. You and I know tactics is a grid based SRPG but a layman is just going to be weirded out that a game with the same title has completely different gameplay.

Mythrignoc said:
Personally, I'm of the opinion that Final Fantasy 1, 6 and 12 were the best games of the series and each game after that got progressively worse until the next awesome game (i.e. 2-5 slowly started to suck and then 6 was awesome, 7-11 slowly started to suck and 12 was awesome, etc). So lets hope my theory holds when Final Fantasy 18 comes out.
As someone who holds 5 up as the best FF I distinctly disagree. I'm really gameplay based though as the stories of FF games have never impressed me. 9 also pops up here and there as a player's fave FF title and in my experience its almost definately favored over 8. But hey, arguing tastes and all..

To me X-2 would've been the best game ever if they'd lost the uber happy Charlie's Angels vibe, the gameplay is a brilliant cross between class management and timing based combat. Its too easy to break the game with some overpowered combinations though, I reckon they rushed it out the gate. Such a waste of good ideas that game was.

That the class-switching has been relegated to the MMO's makes me a sad kitty (I don't like puppies) as it probably shuts down the possibility of 5's or X-2's gameplay coming to a single-player game again.
 

manic_depressive13

New member
Dec 28, 2008
2,617
0
0
Some obvious titles, that others have already mentioned, were missing.

On an unrelated note, you crazy Americans and your method of writing the date.
 

Xerosch

New member
Apr 19, 2008
1,288
0
0
Lagao said:
A bunch of FF material missing from the list!
True, true. I was hoping for a rather complete list of all the games bearing 'Final Fantasy' in the title. This timeline looks a bit like Wikipedia to me, I apprechiate the Escapist's effort, though.
 

VondeVon

New member
Dec 30, 2009
686
0
0
It's very pretty but rather disappointingly lacking in content. Not just the blatant absence of several games but also the lack of information ON those games. I'd be very interested to know what the sales were like for all of those games, what the special reward was for those cosplayers etc.

Although I did enjoy those extra related events - synchronised swimming, the first concert. iTunes. Very spiffy.
 

twm1709

New member
Nov 19, 2009
477
0
0
You know, you could have asked ANY FF fan and they'd have done a far better job at this timeline. Why bother with it at all?
It's more than incomplete, it's... weird. So the birthdate of the first FF creator or the orchestra thing is relevant but half the games and TV series are not. Focusing on style a little too much it seems
 

AngelOfBlueRoses

The Cerulean Prince
Nov 5, 2008
418
0
0
s69-5 said:
I'm gonna make my own FF timeline:

2000 - s69-5 is the first to walk out of his local EB with a copy of FFIX. Enjoys the game, and the nostalgia trip, but is also a bit disappointed by the lack of customization overall. Also thought both Zidane and Kuja were female (the first and only time he ever made that mistake).
Don't worry. You're not the only one. Kuja is the trappiest trap to ever trap traptown. He shames even Bridget.
 

1337mokro

New member
Dec 24, 2008
1,503
0
0
Tempest13 said:
1337mokro said:
What no FF: Tactics? So you chose to exclude an iconic game that pretty much popularized turn based grid games together with the Advanced Wars series?

I hope there will be an update soon or the God of Geek Gaming (ha alliteration) shall not be pleased.
ITT: Fire Emblem doesn't exist

To be fair, obviously not in America, but still
I never played Fire Emblem. So I can't say anything about it. For me and allot of my friends it was FF Tactics and Advanced wars.

I don't comment on things I don't know anything about so I can't exactly speak to the quality of Fire Emblem. It was probably a good game if you liked it.
 

WaderiAAA

Derp Master
Aug 11, 2009
869
0
0
About Final Fantasy being considered one of the best RPGs of all times by many, I think it is more like it being considered the best by many and one of the best by everyone who has ever played it.
 

Charli

New member
Nov 23, 2008
3,445
0
0
Enigmers said:
It's worth noting that FFIX was released around the same time the Playstation 2 was, and thus was kind of ignored in lieu of the hype for the next generation Playstation.
A crime to be sure. RIP the awesome that was the Ninth Final Fantasy.
 

Blood Countess

New member
Oct 22, 2010
221
0
0
I lost interest with this series with FFX and X-2.IX kind of sucked also but after these the series became a total joke and so JRPG cliche they became unbearable to try to play
 

Tempest13

New member
Aug 23, 2010
186
0
0
1337mokro said:
Tempest13 said:
1337mokro said:
What no FF: Tactics? So you chose to exclude an iconic game that pretty much popularized turn based grid games together with the Advanced Wars series?

I hope there will be an update soon or the God of Geek Gaming (ha alliteration) shall not be pleased.
ITT: Fire Emblem doesn't exist

To be fair, obviously not in America, but still
I never played Fire Emblem. So I can't say anything about it. For me and allot of my friends it was FF Tactics and Advanced wars.

I don't comment on things I don't know anything about so I can't exactly speak to the quality of Fire Emblem. It was probably a good game if you liked it.
Just saying that Fire Emblem was a very big Strategy RPG in Japan since the 80s, along with Famicom wars (what we call Advance Wars). In America it didn't come until the 7th edition so FFT would have had a much large influence. Still should have been mentioned
 

Mythrignoc

New member
Oct 17, 2009
77
0
0
Vortigar said:
The only thing weird about this list is the My Days as King entry. It seemed like they were shooting for a list of the numbered entries plus some events and leaving the spinoffs out up until that point.

Overall, this is just a basic entrypoint list for someone who isn't that engaged in the franchise. Sure there's more but if you put everything on there you're going to scare people away. You and I know tactics is a grid based SRPG but a layman is just going to be weirded out that a game with the same title has completely different gameplay.

Mythrignoc said:
Personally, I'm of the opinion that Final Fantasy 1, 6 and 12 were the best games of the series and each game after that got progressively worse until the next awesome game (i.e. 2-5 slowly started to suck and then 6 was awesome, 7-11 slowly started to suck and 12 was awesome, etc). So lets hope my theory holds when Final Fantasy 18 comes out.
As someone who holds 5 up as the best FF I distinctly disagree. I'm really gameplay based though as the stories of FF games have never impressed me. 9 also pops up here and there as a player's fave FF title and in my experience its almost definately favored over 8. But hey, arguing tastes and all..

To me X-2 would've been the best game ever if they'd lost the uber happy Charlie's Angels vibe, the gameplay is a brilliant cross between class management and timing based combat. Its too easy to break the game with some overpowered combinations though, I reckon they rushed it out the gate. Such a waste of good ideas that game was.

That the class-switching has been relegated to the MMO's makes me a sad kitty (I don't like puppies) as it probably shuts down the possibility of 5's or X-2's gameplay coming to a single-player game again.
Ah, I was referring to an overall scheme of things in the games, not just the gameplay. Yes, Final fantasy 5 has all games beat hands down for gameplay due to the job system (final fantasy 3...not so much in all honesty). Unfortunately, the job system really broke when you power leveled all your characters to 99 and all four of them were Rangers combined with Ninjas. Rapid shot + 2 sickeningly powerful katanas = loss of fun in game.

But otherwise yes, the overall idea of choosing your class was great. Problem is, the plot was horrendous in Final Fantasy 5. It was cliche even for it's time.

For me, I would take a great plot with broken gameplay over the best gameplay in the world with a shitty plot. And in all honesty, final fantasy 6 and 12 had both elements covered quite well. The only thing I didn't like from 12 was the utter uselessness of Ardor, Scathe, and Holy due to their animation time dragging down gameplay, but other than that it was fine.

Final fantasy 10 had awesome gameplay as well, I loved the idea of switching between characters for maximum combat efficiency, and that some character skills were just naturally good against certain enemies but the plot and the voice acting, good god I was expecting better from Square Enix since it was the first for PS2.

And final fantasy 13 had a pretty decent albeit confusing plot, but just terrible gameplay (they took away power leveling, the main force behind the playability of final fantasy games and the one thing I actually loved in conjunction with optional uber-bosses like Yiazmat, Ozma and so on). They made the Adamantoise and Adamantortoise pointless fights unless you use Vanille + death. The two big baddies that they have were kind of pointless as well. The Shaolong Gui is a great idea but it's a common monster, so they're kind of suggesting you get to fight it again even though it's the most powerful and once you beat it you've beaten pretty much everything else, making it pointless as a common monster. And the one big baddy we all wanted to fight to begin with but we never got the chance, that massive fucking magma giant thing, you don't get to fight him as far as I can tell.



Sorry, but for me, a good game is when they get the plot right but a great game is when they get the plot and gameplay right and final fantasy 1, 6 and 12 are the only ones to deliver.
 

roostuf

New member
Dec 29, 2009
724
0
0
I love final fantasy, it is a unique franchise that has history and character, and I also love the fact that you can explore the world and stray off the main plot to enjoy some sub-plots.

Thank you escapist.
 

dommyuk

New member
Aug 1, 2008
518
0
0
Was XI the first time Square colaborated with Microsoft? VII and VIII were released on Windows.