The Ethics of "Project Harpoon"

[Fallow]

If you want to compare critical reading skills, bring it on.
You did notice the image was cropped by intention to hide the fact that that article was originally from the Daily Mail, British tabloid infamous for straight-up fabricating stories, right? Example: http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2014/mar/17/dailymail-pcc

Let's see.


I mentioned "reading", which is not the same as "comparing critical reading skills" (the hint is that these are spelled and pronounced differently). The fact you read something entirely different is downright funny.

Internet source criticism 101:
Be vary if:
1 - You are provided with a picture of an article instead of a link.
2 - The picture is provided with no source.
3 - Only parts of the article is available.

If all three are true, don't take anything provided as fact and, by all means, do not spread it further.

Your "internet source criticism 101" seems to lack sourcing (or the reasoning that would invalidate the need for a source).

Come on Fallow, all you had to do was read. If you want to signal how wrong others are, at least put the minimum amount of effort into it.

Captcha: make my day.
Indeed.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. -Charles Caleb Colton


Ooh, and here's another one: Shaming caused a woman to finally deal with obesity. [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3159006/Size-28-woman-shamed-losing-THIRTEEN-STONE-bullies-threw-kebabs-shouted-Oi-fatty.html]

(It might be worth noting that overall the studies appear to correlate support and acceptance with weight loss rather than shaming, but that says nothing for the individual case)