This topic has been bothering me for quite a while now. When asked what my philosophy club would like to discuss the overwhelming answer was "Ghosts!" Lack of any relation to philosophy aside, I was shocked by this prevalent belief. I just wanted to share a few of my own ideas in this regard with my fellow Escapists.
First, I would like to ask you, Can ghosts walk through walls?
To anyone who answered yes, I regret to inform you that this is impossible. Think about walking for a second. Walking is the utilization of friction between matter. You need matter to "walk." We also know that matter does not faze through solid objects at will. Anyone who believes ghosts can somehow "materialize" also has a huge problem to face. Remember E=mc^2? The energy required to create enough atoms for just a human's foot would be so vast nuclear sensors all over the world would be screaming alarms.
Very well, I ghost enthusiast may say, ghosts are not matter. They don't "walk" in any sense. My rebuttal: Now tell me, how can we see them? Our eyes function by perceiving light that is reflected off matter. How can we hear a ghost? Sound also relies upon matter. I don't recall "hearing" electromagnetic radiation, gravity, or magnetism.
Another approach may be to say they are souls or spirits in no way connected to this world. To bring a little philosophy into this, this spiritual dualism is full of holes. How can a world (spiritual) that is so diametrically opposed to the physical world interact with the physical?
Finally, I have a theory for why a belief in ghosts would even exist. Ghosts can represent or reaffirm an idea that we survive death, that we are greater than death. This obviously appeals to many people, but it isn't the main reason. I believe ghosts are nothing more than our tendency to anthropomorphize objects run wild. Let me put it this way: in 1000 cases of mistaken identification I bet 999 would be mistaking an inanimate object for something that is alive. It is not common for anyone to mistake a living object for an inanimate one. This would be very useful in the early days of our species where it would be better to mistake a pile of rocks for a predator than vice-versa.
To counter those who have "seen" ghosts or have "proof" I point to the tendency of humans to anthropomorphize and the realization that our senses are not absolute; they are prone to mistake. Add a scared or hysteric mind and you have a ghost sighting. Besides all of this, I highly doubt every report of ghosts is altruistic or for the sake of spreading the truth. Ghosts and hauntings can be quite profitable.
[/rant]
Anyway, that's my long winded opinion, feel free to add your own.
First, I would like to ask you, Can ghosts walk through walls?
To anyone who answered yes, I regret to inform you that this is impossible. Think about walking for a second. Walking is the utilization of friction between matter. You need matter to "walk." We also know that matter does not faze through solid objects at will. Anyone who believes ghosts can somehow "materialize" also has a huge problem to face. Remember E=mc^2? The energy required to create enough atoms for just a human's foot would be so vast nuclear sensors all over the world would be screaming alarms.
Very well, I ghost enthusiast may say, ghosts are not matter. They don't "walk" in any sense. My rebuttal: Now tell me, how can we see them? Our eyes function by perceiving light that is reflected off matter. How can we hear a ghost? Sound also relies upon matter. I don't recall "hearing" electromagnetic radiation, gravity, or magnetism.
Another approach may be to say they are souls or spirits in no way connected to this world. To bring a little philosophy into this, this spiritual dualism is full of holes. How can a world (spiritual) that is so diametrically opposed to the physical world interact with the physical?
Finally, I have a theory for why a belief in ghosts would even exist. Ghosts can represent or reaffirm an idea that we survive death, that we are greater than death. This obviously appeals to many people, but it isn't the main reason. I believe ghosts are nothing more than our tendency to anthropomorphize objects run wild. Let me put it this way: in 1000 cases of mistaken identification I bet 999 would be mistaking an inanimate object for something that is alive. It is not common for anyone to mistake a living object for an inanimate one. This would be very useful in the early days of our species where it would be better to mistake a pile of rocks for a predator than vice-versa.
To counter those who have "seen" ghosts or have "proof" I point to the tendency of humans to anthropomorphize and the realization that our senses are not absolute; they are prone to mistake. Add a scared or hysteric mind and you have a ghost sighting. Besides all of this, I highly doubt every report of ghosts is altruistic or for the sake of spreading the truth. Ghosts and hauntings can be quite profitable.
[/rant]
Anyway, that's my long winded opinion, feel free to add your own.