So a person sees a thumbnail for a video in which a fairly attractive woman is being spanked while wearing a skimpy, fantasy inspired dress. Are they going to watch it because they want to see more of the girl, or because they hope to be amused by commentary on online sexual roleplay?tyriless said:I doubt this video success was due to Day's sex appeal so much as it was funny to watch and easy to listen too. As far as Army of Darkness, the amount of violence doesn't change sure, but its quality certainly does when it's played as slapstick. It's for less shocking to see a man shoot his evil twin when they just did a bit from the 3 Stooges beforehand. It's the same with this video. The sexy (and I only state that cause you find it quite titillating, apparently) Felicia Day is only part of the joke. The intent is clearly not to turn on, but to amuse. And it is amusing.secretsantaone said:When did I do that?tyriless said:I know you didn't actually say that, but it does suck when someone takes something you said and or did and presents it as a fallacy.
You said that Felicia Day's popularity wasn't based around her looks or sex appeal. I showed you a video where she's clearly using her looks and sex appeal to garner attention. You responded by saying that because the video is a joke, it doesn't apply, which is kind of like saying Army of Darkness isn't violent because it's so over the top.
I'm not saying she's on Olivia Munn's level, but if she looked like Hepler, she wouldn't be nearly as popular.
Why is she not a gamer though? Because she's a woman? Why is there automatic doubt about a woman being a gamer?xefaros said:F.Day was an actor not a gamer,she just found a smart way to get money simple as that.No one should apologize for calling her what she is:A attention horse with geeky audience
Or...it's someone questioning someone's perceived over-representation in a medium, and nowhere near as one sided as you put it. I'm sure he knew about her and her contributions, and felt sick off seeing her so much in place of people he felt were more deserving. This is his opinion, no matter how inflammatory it obviously is, and he has the right to express it.LastGreatBlasphemer said:It's exactly like that.Eyelicker said:Okay, I get it bro, you like metal, don't have to shove it down our throats with that extremely cumbersome and convoluted analogy. No one cares. Thanks for the laugh though. And no, it's nothing like that at all.
It would be someone who's job is to know and understand, and then report on their respected community. Then, having done no personal research on an interviewee, they instead blatantly and disrespectfully question their contributions to said community, intentionally belittling and insulting them along the way.
very true, nearly nothing does, but if someone in the media eye offered to educate offenders rather than chastise, it may convert a handful. its about the only idea i've got to helpPhasmal said:Sadly, nearly nothing does.Mr Ink 5000 said:i understand that side of it, good publicity etc etc. but to clarify, i meant this doesnt really help the battle gainst sexism.DustyDrB said:Firing him help's Destructoid's image, or it at least prevents a black mark to their image. They lost next to nothing in firing him, as this guy was an intern and hadn't contributed anything of note other than a sexist question on Twitter.Mr Ink 5000 said:i think sexism is wrong(and most -isims)
but an extreme response by the employer to sack the offender doesnt help anyone. he'll probably walk away harbouring more ignorance and hate due to the injustice he no doubt sees he was subjected to.
you can not force tolerance, only hope to show/teach/lead by example.
They're not firing him to teach him a lesson. They're firing him because he publicly made an ass of himself and, by proxy, the company he worked for.
CAPCHA: i like you
You can't unmake someone sexist.
Perhaps you can make them realise that sexism is wrong (by perhaps punishing them if they are), but they have to decide to not be sexist by themselves.
I used to think being nice would work, but it doesn't. All you get is `you're not like other women WHO ARE ALL TERRIBLE`.
She writes The Guild and The Guild is brilliant.Baron von Blitztank said:So who is Felicia Day? What does she do that's related to the gaming industry? and Why should I care?
I can't be arsed reading 11 pages of posts so I'm gonna need someone to bring me up to speed in preferably 65 words or less.
Yes, he has the right to express his inflammatory opinion. However, we have the right to call him a dumbass and a douchebag for expressing it and Destructoid has the right to fire him for it. The "rights" argument doesn't hold water. Nobody's arguing whether he COULD've done it, but whether he SHOULD've done it.Eyelicker said:Or...it's someone questioning someone's perceived over-representation in a medium, and nowhere near as one sided as you put it. I'm sure he knew about her and her contributions, and felt sick off seeing her so much in place of people he felt were more deserving. This is his opinion, no matter how inflammatory it obviously is, and he has the right to express it.
I can't say I follow music but it would be more akin to someone saying:Eyelicker said:You like metal, so I'll give you this analogy: It would be more like a journalist questioning the relavance of the chick who plays keyboard for Bleeding Through, who was over represented as fuck a few years ago, and interviewed everywhere, despite playing nothing but simple as fuck parts.
That also strikes me as pretty offensive. As for getting fired because of it, it makes sense in my opinion. He had an internship at a company that covered gaming news. Part of journalism is keeping a trusted public image so your audience wants to hear what you say and so you can get interviews. His tweets made him toxic so he no longer could do either, so they canned him.I keep seeing [you] everywhere. Question: Do you matter at all? Do you even provide anything useful to metal, besides "personality?" could you be considered nothing more than a glorified groupie? You don't seem to add anything creative to the medium.
Yeah, and I think firing is taking it too far, and wouldn't happened was it not for the huge white knight misogyny witch hunt at the moment, and no one would have given a fuck had he said this about a guy. THAT's why I think it's fucked up.newdarkcloud said:Yes, he has the right to express his inflammatory opinion. However, we have the right to call him a dumbass and a douchebag for expressing it and Destructoid has the right to fire him for it. The "rights" argument doesn't hold water. Nobody's arguing whether he COULD've done it, but whether he SHOULD've done it.Eyelicker said:Or...it's someone questioning someone's perceived over-representation in a medium, and nowhere near as one sided as you put it. I'm sure he knew about her and her contributions, and felt sick off seeing her so much in place of people he felt were more deserving. This is his opinion, no matter how inflammatory it obviously is, and he has the right to express it.
Might be offensive but it could also be a valid point. Part of journalism is also making valid points.chimeracreator said:I can't say I follow music but it would be more akin to someone saying:Eyelicker said:You like metal, so I'll give you this analogy: It would be more like a journalist questioning the relavance of the chick who plays keyboard for Bleeding Through, who was over represented as fuck a few years ago, and interviewed everywhere, despite playing nothing but simple as fuck parts.
That also strikes me as pretty offensive. As for getting fired because of it, it makes sense in my opinion. He had an internship at a company that covered gaming news. Part of journalism is keeping a trusted public image so your audience wants to hear what you say and so you can get interviews. His tweets made him toxic so he no longer could do either, so they canned him.I keep seeing [you] everywhere. Question: Do you matter at all? Do you even provide anything useful to metal, besides "personality?" could you be considered nothing more than a glorified groupie? You don't seem to add anything creative to the medium.