Launcelot111 said:
I've never understood her popularity either. What's she done? A tertiary role on Buffy, a couple game voiceovers, and a decent web show. Am I forgetting something? I like her just fine, but I've never understood why her presence in something is noteworthy. That said, I don't hold her success against her at all, and this guy's comments are way too aggressive in any case. I don't see him as sexist as much as tactless and rude (except for that booth babe line).
Well, here goes (and without trying to be sexist, though I'm certain some clowns will come screaming that anyway):
She's a attractive young woman who is socially talented, relatively well connected and has given gamers some kind of "acceptability" cred by doing the whole, "look, I game!" thing. It started off, I'm sure, with great intentions. The shows first season was cute, filled with a bunch of "huh, that's actually true" moments, but later has gone the way one could fully have expected: Team Unicorn posing nude and provocatively surrounded by gaming gear, Felicia's two music videos that have focused on her more feminine assets, the Dragon Age character and show, also not exactly hiding the whole "pretty girl, omg!" bits.
Now, I'm not saying that a beautiful woman can't be a gamer or a gaming "icon", whatever the hell that even means anymore, but I am saying that this pedestal gamers have built for her and put her on is a reaction not to anything significant that she's done, but more owing to the fact that, yes, she is a beautiful lady actress who likes what we do. It is a different case from having someone like Will Wheaton do the same thing, we KNOW men like this stuff. Or do you think that it's been just an accident that the Guild show plays up the sexuality of Day, Amy Okuda or Michelle Boyd, while delegating actress Robin Thorsen to the "ditzy, vapid silly person" part?
Has she brought more women into gaming? I don't know. If so, awesome! There's no question that female role-models are lacking in that area. But to pretend and act as if she's some kind of Virgin Mary, or someone that people can't point out and say that there is (and there IS) an aspect to her that she uses very well, which is inherently tied to her being an attractive woman, is bollocks.
Perez is a dick, there's no two ways about it. His Twitter feed is testimony of this. But had he actually gone and written a proper, direct and thought out article with the same idea in mind, I'm pretty certain that he would have found a lot more proper discussion and support for the thought.