My biggest question is what's with all of the dislike towards moe?Owyn_Merrilin said:Well like I said, it hasn't necessarily killed good anime, just made the sort of stories that made anime popular in the west in the first place much, much less common. I haven't actually watched either of those series (I've seen parts of individual episodes, and what I've seen really didn't look all that bad), but I have seen their influence in other shows. They're kind of like the Watchmen to those other shows' Youngbloods, as other people have pointed out in the thread.Anoni Mus said:Just a parenthesis, everyone talks about Moe like it's the worst thing ever, but K-on is actually good and I liked Mitsudomoe too, usually the fan-base is what sucks.Owyn_Merrilin said:I'll give you the first point, but I think with the second point you're the one who's laser targeting here. I'm not talking about Ecchi, I'm talking about shows like The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya and K-On. Not exactly niche stuff.Windknight said:'best' is overstating it a touch. 'most attuned to blow a teen males mind and make them think this is the best thing ever' is more accurate. Stuff like MD Geist is one of the worst animes I've ever seen, but its fondly remembered for its 80's sensibilities, gory battles and nihilistic 'hero'Owyn_Merrilin said:The way I see it, it's a combination of two things. The first is that in the 80's and 90's, very little of Japan's animation output was making it overseas, and most of what was was the absolute best.
Again, 'moe dominates all' is a misconception. Moe anime dont rate that well in japan. They do however, to repeat myself, laser-target a specific audience who can drop money on boxsets that cost peanuts to make.The other thing is the moe explosion, which, while it has far from killed good anime, it has led to a drop in the kind of shows that made it popular in the west in the first place.
[sub][sub][sub][sub]As for the art styles, late 70's through the 80's 4 lyf[/sub][/sub][/sub][/sub]
Virgin-Fighter Mune-Chan might make little to no impact on the airwaves with only 500 fans, but if the producers know those 500 fans will lay down $500 for a complete boxset if they include a cd, art booklet and a replica of Mune-Chans battle bra, their golden.I have seen a lot of anime in my life, my top 5 is really solid. Logh is the only anime I know but haven't watched yet, I still have faith it might get into my top5.Defeated Detective said:LOGH
I did watch the first episode already some time ago, but that's barely anything at all.
Edit: I'm talking about Haruhi and K-on here, never heard of Mitsudomoe before.
Well, the art style is only a part of it. I can't remember the literal translation of the word (something like "to burn?") but in context it means "something cute that fans can obsess over." Which in practice means certain stereotypical character archetypes which mostly come off as creepy and fetishistic. It also tends to screw up characterization, since the characters fit into their little slots, each tailored to a certain fetish, rather than being actual characters designed for the piece.sextus the crazy said:My biggest question is what's with all of the dislike towards moe?Owyn_Merrilin said:Well like I said, it hasn't necessarily killed good anime, just made the sort of stories that made anime popular in the west in the first place much, much less common. I haven't actually watched either of those series (I've seen parts of individual episodes, and what I've seen really didn't look all that bad), but I have seen their influence in other shows. They're kind of like the Watchmen to those other shows' Youngbloods, as other people have pointed out in the thread.Anoni Mus said:Just a parenthesis, everyone talks about Moe like it's the worst thing ever, but K-on is actually good and I liked Mitsudomoe too, usually the fan-base is what sucks.Owyn_Merrilin said:I'll give you the first point, but I think with the second point you're the one who's laser targeting here. I'm not talking about Ecchi, I'm talking about shows like The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya and K-On. Not exactly niche stuff.Windknight said:'best' is overstating it a touch. 'most attuned to blow a teen males mind and make them think this is the best thing ever' is more accurate. Stuff like MD Geist is one of the worst animes I've ever seen, but its fondly remembered for its 80's sensibilities, gory battles and nihilistic 'hero'Owyn_Merrilin said:The way I see it, it's a combination of two things. The first is that in the 80's and 90's, very little of Japan's animation output was making it overseas, and most of what was was the absolute best.
Again, 'moe dominates all' is a misconception. Moe anime dont rate that well in japan. They do however, to repeat myself, laser-target a specific audience who can drop money on boxsets that cost peanuts to make.The other thing is the moe explosion, which, while it has far from killed good anime, it has led to a drop in the kind of shows that made it popular in the west in the first place.
[sub][sub][sub][sub]As for the art styles, late 70's through the 80's 4 lyf[/sub][/sub][/sub][/sub]
Virgin-Fighter Mune-Chan might make little to no impact on the airwaves with only 500 fans, but if the producers know those 500 fans will lay down $500 for a complete boxset if they include a cd, art booklet and a replica of Mune-Chans battle bra, their golden.I have seen a lot of anime in my life, my top 5 is really solid. Logh is the only anime I know but haven't watched yet, I still have faith it might get into my top5.Defeated Detective said:LOGH
I did watch the first episode already some time ago, but that's barely anything at all.
Edit: I'm talking about Haruhi and K-on here, never heard of Mitsudomoe before.
It's not even a genre, it's a cutesy art-style. It's not like it kills creative quality.
Hell, Clannad and Puella Magi Madoka Magica are both moe and they're both excellent anime.
haven't heard that one before, but it's not like harem and/or stereotyping series suddenly came about when Moe was invented. Shows with women/characters in general appealing to or fitting in a certain stereotype existed before. Really if anything, Anime's just moved away from large amounts of 90s style sex and violence and replaced it with panty shots and hot springs episodes. Although, those were around before coughevangelioncough.Owyn_Merrilin said:Well, the art style is only a part of it. I can't remember the literal translation of the word (something like "to burn?") but in context it means "something cute that fans can obsess over." Which in practice means certain stereotypical character archetypes which mostly come off as creepy and fetishistic. It also tends to screw up characterization, since the characters fit into their little slots, each tailored to a certain fetish, rather than being actual characters designed for the piece.sextus the crazy said:My biggest question is what's with all of the dislike towards moe?Owyn_Merrilin said:Well like I said, it hasn't necessarily killed good anime, just made the sort of stories that made anime popular in the west in the first place much, much less common. I haven't actually watched either of those series (I've seen parts of individual episodes, and what I've seen really didn't look all that bad), but I have seen their influence in other shows. They're kind of like the Watchmen to those other shows' Youngbloods, as other people have pointed out in the thread.Anoni Mus said:Just a parenthesis, everyone talks about Moe like it's the worst thing ever, but K-on is actually good and I liked Mitsudomoe too, usually the fan-base is what sucks.Owyn_Merrilin said:I'll give you the first point, but I think with the second point you're the one who's laser targeting here. I'm not talking about Ecchi, I'm talking about shows like The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya and K-On. Not exactly niche stuff.Windknight said:'best' is overstating it a touch. 'most attuned to blow a teen males mind and make them think this is the best thing ever' is more accurate. Stuff like MD Geist is one of the worst animes I've ever seen, but its fondly remembered for its 80's sensibilities, gory battles and nihilistic 'hero'Owyn_Merrilin said:The way I see it, it's a combination of two things. The first is that in the 80's and 90's, very little of Japan's animation output was making it overseas, and most of what was was the absolute best.
Again, 'moe dominates all' is a misconception. Moe anime dont rate that well in japan. They do however, to repeat myself, laser-target a specific audience who can drop money on boxsets that cost peanuts to make.The other thing is the moe explosion, which, while it has far from killed good anime, it has led to a drop in the kind of shows that made it popular in the west in the first place.
[sub][sub][sub][sub]As for the art styles, late 70's through the 80's 4 lyf[/sub][/sub][/sub][/sub]
Virgin-Fighter Mune-Chan might make little to no impact on the airwaves with only 500 fans, but if the producers know those 500 fans will lay down $500 for a complete boxset if they include a cd, art booklet and a replica of Mune-Chans battle bra, their golden.I have seen a lot of anime in my life, my top 5 is really solid. Logh is the only anime I know but haven't watched yet, I still have faith it might get into my top5.Defeated Detective said:LOGH
I did watch the first episode already some time ago, but that's barely anything at all.
Edit: I'm talking about Haruhi and K-on here, never heard of Mitsudomoe before.
It's not even a genre, it's a cutesy art-style. It's not like it kills creative quality.
Hell, Clannad and Puella Magi Madoka Magica are both moe and they're both excellent anime.
Have you watched season 3 of Digimon recently? Having watched the first two seasons again I realized just how much nostalgia went into my appreciation for them, but season 3 actually stood on it's own. I liked aspects of it more than I did when I was a kid.shrekfan246 said:Dragonball Z... for all the nostalgia I have for it (considering that alongside Pokemon and Digimon it was one of the three anime I actually watched as a child), it varies more wildly in quality than any other series I've watched. The two 'Mon shows are pretty terrible, but consistently so and they reach a level of being so bad that they're pretty enjoyable to watch regardless of that. DBZ has a ton of really good stuff, and then gets marred down by the sheer amount of padded filling they put in (which I've heard is actually less than the manga series had?) and the convoluted nature of how dying is a serious thing, but only sometimes when the plot dictates.
You're actually not the first person to say that to me...The Almighty Aardvark said:Have you watched season 3 of Digimon recently? Having watched the first two seasons again I realized just how much nostalgia went into my appreciation for them, but season 3 actually stood on it's own. I liked aspects of it more than I did when I was a kid.
That's the reason I watched them again, never got a chance to see everything in sequence as a kid. In all honesty I would give season 2 a miss. It's got all of the schlock of the first season, but lacks the originality and charm. The third season is surprisingly serious and dark. Which makes sense as it was written by the same guy who did Serial Experiments: Lain.shrekfan246 said:You're actually not the first person to say that to me...The Almighty Aardvark said:Have you watched season 3 of Digimon recently? Having watched the first two seasons again I realized just how much nostalgia went into my appreciation for them, but season 3 actually stood on it's own. I liked aspects of it more than I did when I was a kid.
I haven't, though I was planning on going through the first three seasons again at some point, since I never actually saw any of them in their entirety when they were first syndicated. Just gotta find the time...
I liked the movie(s)!The Almighty Aardvark said:That's the reason I watched them again, never got a chance to see everything in sequence as a kid. In all honesty I would give season 2 a miss. It's got all of the schlock of the first season, but lacks the originality and charm. The third season is surprisingly serious and dark. Which makes sense as it was written by the same guy who did Serial Experiments: Lain.shrekfan246 said:You're actually not the first person to say that to me...The Almighty Aardvark said:Have you watched season 3 of Digimon recently? Having watched the first two seasons again I realized just how much nostalgia went into my appreciation for them, but season 3 actually stood on it's own. I liked aspects of it more than I did when I was a kid.
I haven't, though I was planning on going through the first three seasons again at some point, since I never actually saw any of them in their entirety when they were first syndicated. Just gotta find the time...
I enjoyed the movie too, but I seem to be rather alone in that opinion. At the very least it was better than the first two seasons
Wait, what? Anime as we know it has been around since the 60's, when Osama Tezuka started producing animation inspired by the works of Walt Disney, with a few Japanese animated works actually predating his stuff by quite a bit. It's only been popular in the west since the 80's, but anime itself is much older.Lilani said:I sort of feel like anime hasn't been around long enough for there to be any distinct "golden years" yet. Anime as we know it has only been around since about the 80s, and for those of you who think anime now is freakier than it was back then...well, then I think you haven't done enough research just yet. If you think 80s anime is all Yu Yu Hakusho and Samurai Pizza Cats then you are sorely mistaken.
Depending on what you watch, anime back then was just as bogged down in tropes, formulas, and perverseness as it is now. There are definitely more genres, more marketing, and bigger budgets now, but tentacle porn didn't start with otakus and filler in the 80s is just as bad as filler today.
I'm just finishing this series and I have to agree with you. I have watched PLENTY of outstanding series over the years, but a lot these series tend to come from 80's and 90's. You have to do an increadible amount of digging to find shows like monster,Ergo Proxy,Paranoia Agent,Boogipop Phantom,Kikaider, and Fist of the North Star. Moe makes me ill and Fan service has it's place.Defeated Detective said:But that's wrong, the greatest animated series of all time is Legend of the Galactic Heroes.Soviet Heavy said:Macross Plus, which he considers one of the greatest animated series of all time.
You might call this "opinion", and that pretty much correct, but it is undeniable that no anime can ever have a story that can match the scope and plot of LoGH, it is the biggest AND the best an anime can ever get, it features not only space, the final frontier, but also how politics and strife is eternal, it even tackles the difference between democracy and monarchy and how what ultimately makes a government good are the people who run it and the people they govern.
And did I mention how realistic the characters in this show feel? Even the characters in this series that have the smallest roles have their own personalities, no one is placed on where they are or the sake of convenience, every one of them, whether they're good or bad, have a purpose.
LoGH is one of the few anime that still exists that makes anime WORTH DEFENDING(as a medium). It is undeniably the Citizen Kane of anime, and the closest thing to Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek if it ever had to feature war.
Something is still lost due to digitizing everything. I understand that this is progress for the sake of convenience, since handpainted cells and backgrounds cost way more than simply doing it on the computer, but you still lose that grit.sextus the crazy said:This seems to be similar to the distaste people get when watching computerized special effects. Yes, the art looks different because
the technology is different. This doesn't make them worse animators in any sense, nor does it reduce the quality of the art. The fact that people prefer the art style of say trigun or cowboy bebop over lucky star does not make lucky star or post-90s animation worse. The 90s was only a golden age if you prefer older animation styles. Otherwise, there's just as much good stuff being pumped out today as there was in the 90s. And on the point the berserk movies, the fact that the development studio chose to use ugly 3D does not mean that all of modern animation is terrible. For every good hand-drawn anime of the 90s, there's plenty of stuff that looks like crap and/or doesn't hold up. Like the original Berserk anime.
Or Jin-Roh, you forgot that one. I guess I'm a sucker for hand drawn cells, and even rotoscoping. (as an aside, I've never understood the disdain for rotoscoping. Like anything, if it is done well, it looks really good, see the opening credits for Cowboy Bebop the movie.)Abandon4093 said:Yea, there's not been many truly impressive animes since the 90's. Sure they still crop up from time to time. But 99% of animes that come out now are shitty Highschool power fantasies.
A lot of the greats from the 80's and 90's were made for the sake of being made. You just have to look at how much attention the animators paid to the background events and the small touches that made things like Akira and GitS such amazing works of art.
Jin-Roh was I believe the very last anime drawn on cells before everything went completely digital.Soviet Heavy said:Or Jin-Roh, you forgot that one. I guess I'm a sucker for hand drawn cells, and even rotoscoping. (as an aside, I've never understood the disdain for rotoscoping. Like anything, if it is done well, it looks really good, see the opening credits for Cowboy Bebop the movie.)Abandon4093 said:Yea, there's not been many truly impressive animes since the 90's. Sure they still crop up from time to time. But 99% of animes that come out now are shitty Highschool power fantasies.
A lot of the greats from the 80's and 90's were made for the sake of being made. You just have to look at how much attention the animators paid to the background events and the small touches that made things like Akira and GitS such amazing works of art.