I was pissed that they left Bombadil out. He was awesome, damnit! And for the record, I think he's using stuff from Unfinished Tales and the History of Middle-Earth series, which would explain the appearence of Saruman, Galadriel, and Elrond. As for Legolas, he's Prince of Mirkwood, they visit Mirkwood, it makes sense that he might be there.DarkPanda XIII said:Unlike Lord of the Rings, which had to cut a good portion out (Bye bye Tom Bombadil ;., they left the majority of the cast, even adding a few names to the list. A Theory came up that suggested they're combining the original Hobbit with one of the unnamed stories that Tolken left behind, that told us about how Gandalf chose Bilbo to go on an adventure. Because of this, you'll be seeing old, and new faces, maybe even Legolas, though that's not 100% yet.
LOTR has dragons - in the appendix, if I recallpoiumty said:I thought The Hobbit was better than even LOTR itself. For one, it had a dragon.
Yes I have.1) Have you read "The Hobbit"?
I'm a bit confused as to what Galadriel is doing in the movie, but other than that, I like it. I've been waiting a long time for this movie to get announced, and I'll definitely go and see it when it comes out.2) Whether or not you have read the book, what are your feelings when seeing this trailer?
That is one of the biggest issue I had with the casting/trailer. The age of Thorin. He wasn't young. Anyway hopefully I can overlook that when I go to see it.DarkPanda XIII said:My feelings on the movie was estatic. I really enjoyed the book and really enjoyed seeing this trailer. I want to see it early, but know fully well I can't. Only major complaint is the actor that plays Thorin Oakenshield is a bit younger than his character (as Thorin was the oldest). But I digress...