The Human Centipede & The Line Between Gore and Shameless Gore

Enigma6667

New member
Apr 3, 2010
766
0
0
(I know I'm a total Yahtzee rip off, and I'm unoriginal and such. I'll try to make this one a little less rantish and rip-off-y but I still feel this needs to be said).



There's a thin line between being gory to actually make your film scary, and being disgusting just for the sake of being disgusting. Well, that pretty much sums up my thoughts of The Human Centipede directed by Tom Six, but stick around because I unfortunately wasn't one of the lucky souls to get paid for watching this barf-inducing flick and write a review about it, so you better be pretty damn thankful I'm doing this for you and saving your eyeballs.

So, apparently, a lot of people in the "indie" crowd won't shut up about this movie's vile imagery, and I can honestly see why. The concept may seem harmless slasher fare at first. Two college girls are in Europe on vacation, and their car crashes, or they get lost or something like that, I dunno I wasn't paying attention too much in the set-up scenes. They go to this old doctor's house to see how to get to their destination and he gives them directions all right. Directions straight into their NEW HELL!!! ...wow I'm going to hell for these cheesy 80s inspired taglines. Anyways, he locks them up into his cell along with an Asian fellow, and he begins saying that they're gonna be part of an experiment. Okay, so at first glace, I see a mixture of the game Operation and Saw, but I can kinda dig that....and then he explains what exactly his experiment is, and what I'm about to tell you is completely in the movie and I'm not making this sh*t up, and I can't even make it up even if I tried!

The good doctor once worked as a surgeon who separated conjoined twins, but then he apparently got a case of the crazies and now wants to surgically conjoin three people into one, and form the first "Human Centipede". What is the aforementioned "Human Centipede", and why has it caused so many viewers to gag at theaters? Well, before I thoroughly explain, a picture is worth a thousand words, so here's a picture:



Still don't get it? Well, the human centipede connects the three people by (and once again I'm being totally serious here) stitching together their mouths and anuses, and the main idea is that their digestive track will be connected meaning that when one of them shits, it will go into the next person's mouth. I wish that I could come up with something so sick and demented and at the same time, I don't think I could live with myself if I did so fuck that idea. This is one of those rare torture films that isn't even actually torture in the sense that most viewers consider it. There are no preposterous contraptions. There is not really much in terms of "blood" (You see more brown fluids than you do red) when you compare it to other gore-fests. And it is just all for the "benefit" of medical science, much like what GLaDOS would do to her test subjects. It isn't so much torture as it is "becoming an abomination that can't possibly live with itself" and it is in the high concept that the film gets disgusting originality points.

But what's this?? Oh snap! It's the "flame train"! ALL ABOARD MOTHERFUCKERS!!

That's right, this movie despite getting some free points on the get-go, still suffers from lots of major problems. The main one being of course, it's disgusting-ness (If that's even a word). Watching the three poor unfortunate souls stuck together mouth-to-anus is rather sickening, but only on brief occasions. The film isn't always disgusting. The first half is basically building up to the much-lauded centipede that is its unique selling point, and it's because of this that it's surprisingly tame when compared to other indie gore-fests that I've seen, but when it does get into high gear, however, it's actually rather vomit inducing. There's one scene in particular where one of the girls is trying to vomit but her mouth is stitched up, and her vomit spills from the cracks of her stitches. And I'm about to quote Roger Ebert here when I say that although you do NOT want to be part of the human centipede at all, you especially don't want to be in the middle. *Shudders*

Now here's the deal with a film of this disgusting caliber: As I said in the beginning, being gory, and being shamelessly gory are two entirely different things. Films like Aliens, Nightmare on Elm Street, and even the original Saw used gore to heighten the experience rather than to be exploitative...okay maybe the original Saw was being exploitative, but it was the closest the series was to being REALLY good. Even with Antichrist, despite being really sick in lots of parts, it was acceptable because it was drenched in arty symbolism and pretentiousness behind the fact that Charlotte Gainsbourg was fapping Willem Dafoe's erection, and I was able to forgive the fact that it was pretentious because it still emotionally affected me. Same goes for the French film Irreversible. Without the non-chronological storytelling mechanic, it would've been a shameless rape-torture-porn film, but by telling the story backwards Memento style, it conveys a true message without being pornography for the depraved.

The Human Centipede doesn't seem to grasp on this. There doesn't seem to be a reason for Dr. Heiter to want to make the human centipede other than the fact that he's completely out of his trousers and that the director wanted to desperately push the envelope for shock value. And that's what basically makes it torture-porn in every sense of the word. Even Jason Voorhees had an apparent motive: Kill the camp counselors that killed me and later killed my mom long ago. Simple enough. Jigsaw at least had a whole "moral lesson" thing for torturing people. But all Heiter has for a motive is: "Here's a human centipede...yeah...watch it do stuff...like crawl.......and eat stuff...like shit....I have no idea why I'm doing this...........I'm gonna have another spoonful of anti-depressants I'll be right back". Maybe this could've been some kind of intelligent discussion on the effects of science, and tampering with genetic codes, and blahdy blehrdy doink, but it instead comes across as shameless. That's actually the best word I can come up with when describing this film: Shameless. However, it at least knows exactly what it is, and adds dollops of of pitch black humor into the mix.

Probably my favorite aspect of this film that actually gives it some life is Deiter Laser's outlandish performance as Dr. Heiter. You know how Nicolas Cage is extremely fun to watch when he's unhinged in films like Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans, Kick-Ass, and even in the awful yet hilarious Wicker Man remake? Well that's exactly how I felt with Laser's approach with Dr. Heiter. Sure he's insane just for the sake of being insane, but it's just so fun to watch that you forget that. Even his own home is more like a labyrinth than an actual house with doors and passage ways leading to absolutely nowhere and in one scene where the police come in to investigate, he almost seems like he's wanting them to suspect what he's doing. Maybe so that he can add more people into his centipede. Or for showing off purposes. The other actors and actresses aren't anything special, but I guess they get the job done. And you have to admit, the actors and actresses chosen to play the victim trio were admittedly brave for even agreeing to do some of the stuff in this film.

But that's the thing. What was the point of this film? Dr. Heiter didn't have any motive for doing this. I'm absolutely sure that the actors portraying the victim trio weren't enjoying their job. In fact, it all just feels like the director's masturbation material, rather than an actual horror film. Which brings me to another point:

THIS. MOVIE. IS. NOT. SCARY.

If there was any suspense in it, I didn't see it. It all just felt like a barrage of disgusting images that are trying to top the last one. There's not really much of an atmosphere. The characters you're supposed to care for aren't anybody interesting compared to Dr. Heiter. The killer is more hilarious to watch than threatening (Which is kind of a pro, but SHUT UP I'm trying to make a point here). And most importantly: The gross-out factor just simply devalues anything that the movie has going for it. It all feels like this film is more for the director's gain rather than the viewer's, which is what adds dumbfounded stupidity to something that could've been better had it followed the Martyrs school of how to do torture film correctly (Yes, I thought Martyrs was great, even in the second half).

Anyway, however, I still can't really decide whether The Human Centipede is TRULY bad or not. Although it's certainly not a work of art, and is indeed shameless in its exploitation, the dark humor and Deiter Laser's unCage'd (Geddit? HAH!) performance added some much needed life into this otherwise lifeless, humiliatingly unscary, and shameless film.

But one more thing I forgot to add: There will be a sequel. If you look carefully at the poster I put up, the title is actually The Human Centipede [First Sequence] meaning that a [Second Sequence] has been planned from the get-go...just thought I'd throw that out there to those who actually wanted a sequel. And that's probably only 2 people, and one of them is the fucking director.

I'm not gonna use the "points" or "star" rating system anymore because too many people use scores too much to justify if its good without reading the ACTUAL review. So here's something else:

Final Verdict: If you have the stomach for it, a barf bag, a grasp of the concept of dark humor, or a sick fetish with watching people's anuses no matter what they're stitched onto, then there is probably something in here worth your time. For everyone else, it's just exploitative, disgusting, and...did I mention "shameless" for the bajillionth time?
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Hmmm, well I've heard of this movie, and despite being a horror fan it does not seem to be my cup of tea overall. That said I seem to remember some of the reviewers I had read (like say Encyclopedia Dramatica) mentioning that the purpose of the experiment was to solve humanity's food problem, the idea being that by linking the digestive systems this way one meal would in theory feed the entire "centipede", that makes like zero sense, but that was the motive as I've heard it described.

That said, expect this movie to be a cult classic for like forever. Simply put simply by being original (and it is that) and having a high gross out factor, it's going to be right up there with things like the "Guinea Pig" films. Almost guaranteed at some point we're going to see some dude gunned down on a killing rampage, and someone is going to find this movie in their collection and make a big deal about it.

Speaking for myself, I love gore and "gross outs" in horror movies, however to me it seems like the premise of this movie is something that would have worked better as an "aside" in another movie. You know where some mad doctor shows this human centipede and a diagram of how it works to his next potential experimentation victims on his way through his lab or whatever.

But then again scat has never been my thing, I almost gagged in "Game Of Death" (I think that was the name) when the protaganist had to eat the fecese in a resteraunt as the 5th (I believe) challenge. However I'd imagine that the crowd "2 girls 1 cup" was made for (it was supposedly a preview trailer for a full movie) would love this... so I guess it comes down to the fact that I (and others) are simply not the target audience. I'd imagine if you went to some BDSM scat community this would be viewed as the most awesome thing ever (though that's only a guess).
 

Vrex360

Badass Alien
Mar 2, 2009
8,379
0
0
I have heard a lot about this movie and most of the buzz is pretty much what you summarised in your review. From the sound of it, it is a pointless and shamelessly exploitative horror film.

Maybe I'll give it a watch, but only if I can rent it for about four dollars.
 

Billion Backs

New member
Apr 20, 2010
1,431
0
0
FLegmA said:
The 100% medically accurate part scares me o_O
Well, nothing really stops you from stitching someone's mouth to someone else's asshole and severing their ligaments so they can't walk. It's as medically accurate as saying that being shot in the head with a gun generally means bad things.

But considering how little sense that makes medically, it's ridiculous. I've been laughing my ass off at the concept.

Just making someone's shithole connected to someone's mouth won't magically make their digestive system conjoined in a sense that it works. There's a reason people shit, it doesn't contain much a human body can benefit from so it comes out. It has no nutritional value, so there literally is no point in doing something like that other then for shit and giggles which I assume was the reasoning of "Doctor Hater" (And yes, I know, it's Heiter)

If that was some kind of twisted plot to solve world hunger, just killing and eating half of population would work better. Hah.
 

Blueruler182

New member
May 21, 2010
1,549
0
0
I saw the poster and thought "He's got some really friendly friends and one fucked up fetish," then I saw the diagram and thought, "Well, that's shitty," and now I'm worried about my sanity.

Also, not the best imagery while one is eating. Nor are the descriptions people are giving in the forum...
 

rokkolpo

New member
Aug 29, 2009
5,375
0
0
.........eh......no.

i actually have thought of this once in my life.
(i had alot of lego)

but this sounds horrible and i already know which of my friends will see it. and which won't.
 

Abedeus

New member
Sep 14, 2008
7,412
0
0
Wait, wait, wait.

Wouldn't such a centipede die after, like, a week of starvation? You can NOT survive longer than that while your only food is crap. Literal crap.

Also, such a thing wouldn't be able to move. Assuming the first person would live on something viable, like actual food, the second and third would be starved. Unable to move or do ANYTHING. So the first person would have to carry the other two, in pain and agony.

And pain can cause a LOT of medical problems, like kardiomyopathie. Heart muscle's death caused by stress. I think stress of being fed someone's feces forever would be enough.
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
Abedeus said:
Wait, wait, wait.

Wouldn't such a centipede die after, like, a week of starvation? You can NOT survive longer than that while your only food is crap. Literal crap.

Also, such a thing wouldn't be able to move. Assuming the first person would live on something viable, like actual food, the second and third would be starved. Unable to move or do ANYTHING. So the first person would have to carry the other two, in pain and agony.

And pain can cause a LOT of medical problems, like kardiomyopathie. Heart muscle's death caused by stress. I think stress of being fed someone's feces forever would be enough.
This is called thinking to much. Notice how the user tried to inject logic into a gore film. Also notice how s/he tried to reason why it wouldn't work. This is all proved invalid when the director clearly just wants to make scat films.

(In other words, you're overthinking it dude =] )
 

Abedeus

New member
Sep 14, 2008
7,412
0
0
dogstile said:
Abedeus said:
Wait, wait, wait.

Wouldn't such a centipede die after, like, a week of starvation? You can NOT survive longer than that while your only food is crap. Literal crap.

Also, such a thing wouldn't be able to move. Assuming the first person would live on something viable, like actual food, the second and third would be starved. Unable to move or do ANYTHING. So the first person would have to carry the other two, in pain and agony.

And pain can cause a LOT of medical problems, like kardiomyopathie. Heart muscle's death caused by stress. I think stress of being fed someone's feces forever would be enough.
This is called thinking to much. Notice how the user tried to inject logic into a gore film. Also notice how s/he tried to reason why it wouldn't work. This is all proved invalid when the director clearly just wants to make scat films.

(In other words, you're overthinking it dude =] )
It's just that... I can't fear anything that is not even remotely plausible in the real world. And it's not disgusting as much as it is laughable.
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
Abedeus said:
dogstile said:
Abedeus said:
Wait, wait, wait.

Wouldn't such a centipede die after, like, a week of starvation? You can NOT survive longer than that while your only food is crap. Literal crap.

Also, such a thing wouldn't be able to move. Assuming the first person would live on something viable, like actual food, the second and third would be starved. Unable to move or do ANYTHING. So the first person would have to carry the other two, in pain and agony.

And pain can cause a LOT of medical problems, like kardiomyopathie. Heart muscle's death caused by stress. I think stress of being fed someone's feces forever would be enough.
This is called thinking to much. Notice how the user tried to inject logic into a gore film. Also notice how s/he tried to reason why it wouldn't work. This is all proved invalid when the director clearly just wants to make scat films.

(In other words, you're overthinking it dude =] )
It's just that... I can't fear anything that is not even remotely plausible in the real world. And it's not disgusting as much as it is laughable.
While it is possible some wackjob could go insane and make you do this, i see your point :p

And its ok, I laughed too.
 

DracoSuave

New member
Jan 26, 2009
1,685
0
0
Abedeus said:
Wait, wait, wait.

Wouldn't such a centipede die after, like, a week of starvation? You can NOT survive longer than that while your only food is crap. Literal crap.
Blood poisoning first.

And yeah, the film covers that.

Also, such a thing wouldn't be able to move. Assuming the first person would live on something viable, like actual food, the second and third would be starved. Unable to move or do ANYTHING. So the first person would have to carry the other two, in pain and agony.

And pain can cause a LOT of medical problems, like kardiomyopathie. Heart muscle's death caused by stress. I think stress of being fed someone's feces forever would be enough.
Yeah. It's not like the film goes 'They're healthy!'
 

Kevonovitch

New member
Apr 15, 2009
512
0
0
Sinclose said:
FLegmA said:
The 100% medically accurate part scares me o_O
IMO this is complete bullshit for promotional purposes. Like Texas Chainsaw Massacre, the 1st movie was advertised as 'a true story'. It was false, of course.
well, true, the actual "massacre" was what? 1 family of 4? if i remember, the dad was a drunk and chainsawed his own family or something? the event itself, from what i remember, was an actual event. to the extrent it has been blown up via hollywood, i haven't a clue.

same goes with the human centapede. a friend of mine dug this up, apparently it was an experiment done by either a chinese or american, i don't remember, doctor, and it was early-mid 1900's if i remember.

sorry my info's not the greatest, i can't remember exactly, and finding info on the net when there's a movie out is like trying to find a needle in a haystack w/o a magnet, or a metal detector.
 

WaysideMaze

The Butcher On Your Back
Apr 25, 2010
845
0
0
WanderFreak said:
This was such a misfire.

A twisted body horror movie? A fucking sick premise? From a NOT Japanese director? With subtle commentaries on Nazi experimentation and language barriers? And it's a low budget horror movie? THIS IS GOING TO BE AWESOME!

90 minutes of drudgery later, it's somehow managed to make the surgical grafting together of humans boring. It's not scary, it's so over the top as to become a self parody rather than disturbing, and it isn't even really that gross. Sure, it's an icky concept. But babies are an icky concept. Ick doesn't automatically become ick, you have to work to make it truly disgusting. And it seems he felt that "dudes, human shit centipede!" was itself enough.
Wow, ninja'd on the first reply. You pretty much summed up my entire opinion of the film right there.
One of the most boring films I've ever seen, I can't recommend it to anyone for any reason. Except perhaps as a cure for insomnia.

EDIT - Only just noticed someone necroed an old thread. Sorry for quoting such an old post.
 

Shiftygiant

New member
Apr 12, 2011
433
0
0
Hmm.

Kevonovitch said:
Sinclose said:
FLegmA said:
The 100% medically accurate part scares me o_O
IMO this is complete bullshit for promotional purposes. Like Texas Chainsaw Massacre, the 1st movie was advertised as 'a true story'. It was false, of course.
well, true, the actual "massacre" was what? 1 family of 4? if i remember, the dad was a drunk and chainsawed his own family or something? the event itself, from what i remember, was an actual event. to the extrent it has been blown up via hollywood, i haven't a clue.

same goes with the human centapede. a friend of mine dug this up, apparently it was an experiment done by either a chinese or american, i don't remember, doctor, and it was early-mid 1900's if i remember.

sorry my info's not the greatest, i can't remember exactly, and finding info on the net when there's a movie out is like trying to find a needle in a haystack w/o a magnet, or a metal detector.
No, the fact is it is medically accurate. The director visited a consulting doctor, who more or less told him how. The whole one way digestive thing, whilst laughable, is possible due to alternative eating methods (a tube) to sustain it. The question one mast ask now is: WHY?


WHY DID ANYONE WATCH IT?

WHY DID YOU GIVE SIX THE MONEY FOR PART 2

WHY HAVE YOU GIVEN HIM THE MONEY FOR ANOTHER ONE?

Also massecare was based around the Ed Gein story, a one time murderer and necrophiliac from Texas who dug up dead body's and took them apart with chainsaws.