The Iraq War is Ending

Recommended Videos

SidingWithTheEnemy

New member
Sep 29, 2011
759
0
0
Furioso said:
No that was a different conflict, this one started after 9/11
I know. You're right! Officially it's called a "different conflict". Call me names, but I'm not so sure about that. It's the same country (and has been the same moustache man dictator) after all. I go even further and am not calling it "conflict" it's a war, with all inhuman brutality we hopefully never going to experience first hand. A war with a rather long ceasefire period (a decade or two) in between but a war nevertheless.
 

Johann610

New member
Nov 20, 2009
203
0
0
Can I poke a shade off-topic and say that we need to get them to Afghanistan? When are we gonna be done in THAT sandhole?
[edit: Rock-hole]
 

ReservoirAngel

New member
Nov 6, 2010
3,779
0
0
TheDarkEricDraven said:
The US shoulda been outta there years ago. Frankly, I just want this war over with so we can get to a good exciting war, like WWIII, or a renewed conflict with the Canadians.
You've had your wars! Step back while Britain acts like aggressive cunts to innocent countries. It's been so long since we have.
 

FEichinger

Senior Member
Aug 7, 2011
534
0
21
Unless I am mistaken ... wasn't it even the Bush Administration deciding on this to happen by the end of the following term?

Not that Bush wasn't responsible for *that other war*, and thereby shouldn't be considered in the first place ... But still, Obama is being praised for stuff he just finishes xD Whilst that of course is more than Bush ever achieved ... Gawd, American Presidents ...
 

ReservoirAngel

New member
Nov 6, 2010
3,779
0
0
TheDarkEricDraven said:
ReservoirAngel said:
You've had your wars! Step back while Britain acts like aggressive cunts to innocent countries. It's been so long since we have.
By all means! I'd love to allow you Brits take over as the pig headed idiots of the world!
Well we have had practise. You don't invade, bully and control half the world without picking up a few tricks along the way.
 

RuralGamer

New member
Jan 1, 2011
953
0
0
Soviet Heavy said:
Ah yes "Iraq", home of the now dead terrorist Saddam Hussein and allegedly in possession of civilization destroying nuclear warheads.


We have dismissed those claims.
The thing I'm afraid of is that tomorrow we'll (that is America and Britain; the Middle East griefing duo) will be going into Iran or somewhere else to stop someone using "vertified" weapons of mass destruction or somewhere to "remove an oppressive government" and then spend ten years propping up the new ineffectual one.
(Actually I'd like to see what that pottymouth is going to say in ME3 when the Reapers are burning his house down; Turian Council-member = massive jerk)

PS: OP, you have an awesome name and an even more awesome avatar!
 

Ickorus

New member
Mar 9, 2009
2,886
0
0
The war isn't anywhere near over, I just hope that the Iraqi people will be able to fend off the remaining terrorists in the country by themselves otherwise in 10 years time they will be just as oppressed as they were before.
 

SodaDew

New member
Sep 28, 2009
417
0
0
Thank god that's over, Now if we can fix our economy then we can get 100% out of the middle east -_- I'm still not going to vote for Obama tho.
 

A Shadows Age

New member
Mar 30, 2011
165
0
0
Smokej said:
USA should learn from the romans how to start a "just war". They were more successfull bullshitting themselves (and friends and allies of course)...
Yes, but you see the thing is that we don't have that many lions and or crucifixes... oh well.
 

Sandernista

New member
Feb 26, 2009
1,302
0
0
Razada said:
tg851 said:
Razada said:
Or we could just sit on our defunct nuclear arsenal and keep paying lots of young men to stand around with guns and look scary. Cause that makes SENSE.
you DO relise most of the nukes are in inactive reserve, approximately 50%(active within 2 weeks)
30% are in the "hedge stockpile"(meaning deployments within 12 hours)
the rest are armed and ready.

Razada said:
But it doesn't matter at all, does it. Even if Iraq turns into a post-apocalyptic hellhole once the Americans are out of there noone will give a flying fuck cause the western media will "Forget" about the whole situation.
don't they always?

Razada said:
Or, you know, we can just sit back and stop reporting on it. Like we did throughout the 20th century. Or perhaps we can continue betraying what allies we have in the area (I am talking to YOU Britain and France)
thank bush of that,and when Obama tries and fix the screw-ups he causes he gets pissed on for "trying to turn the us into Canada"

Razada said:
Yeah. Long the the USA! Land of the not at all free, Home of the not that brave!
that's why I'm Canadian.looks like manifest destiny will happen,just not the way the u.s. expected.
I call the worlds collective nuclear arsenals defunct because, bar the Israelis (The actions of that particular nation will never shock me. Not Anti-Semitic, Anti-Zionist though.) noone will ever use them. No point in blowing up your major markets and tanking your own economies now is there. I was not commenting on the fact that most of our nukes will not be ready to fire at a moments notice. The fact that anyone is sitting on such colossally stupid money sinks amazes me (Bar the Israelis. Them crazy)
Are you forgetting the second most populous country, who has an extremely bad relationship with its closest nuclear neighbor?

I wouldn't be surprised by a indo-paki nuclear exchange.
 

Agayek

Ravenous Gormandizer
Oct 23, 2008
5,175
0
0
I Have No Idea said:
Obama has said that American troops will be out by the end of the year. Contractors will stay, but all US military forces will have gone. Thoughts?

Personally, I'm just glad our boys can come back home after this 10 year ordeal.
Haven't they said this like half a dozen times now? I'll believe it when it actually happens.
 

Rex Fallout

New member
Oct 5, 2010
359
0
0
cthulhuspawn82 said:
I Have No Idea said:
Obama has said that American troops will be out by the end of the year. Contractors will stay, but all US military forces will have gone. Thoughts?
Obama has a lot of things that aren't so, like closing Gitmo. I don't put too much faith in what a politician until he actually does it.
Politicians lie. All. The Time. To be honest I'm not sure if we should be pulling out quite yet. We jumped into this conflict, which may or may not have really been needed, that is an entire other debate on it's own, but we have to be extremely careful leaving. Is Iraq prepared for us to be gone? Does it have adequate security to defend itself from enemies? Is it's democracy in place yet? Have the people accepted the democracy? Will they accept it? So many questions that need answered.
 

RewardMe

New member
Dec 2, 2009
165
0
0
RuralGamer said:
Soviet Heavy said:
Ah yes "Iraq", home of the now dead terrorist Saddam Hussein and allegedly in possession of civilization destroying nuclear warheads.

We have dismissed those claims.
The thing I'm afraid of is that tomorrow we'll (that is America and Britain; the Middle East griefing duo) will be going into Iran or somewhere else to stop someone using "vertified" weapons of mass destruction or somewhere to "remove an oppressive government" and then spend ten years propping up the new ineffectual one.

Na, i doubt it will happen. We brits can't afford another war, what with the military cuts and all.

But, saying that, the libya bombings has just ended. So that should free up a couple of spitfires and a fishing boat for the next war.