Oh, and wars.RedEyesBlackGamer said:You forgot custody cases. Men really get the shaft there too.The_root_of_all_evil said:RedEyesBlackGamer said:The western male really has nothing to complain about.![]()
In every country for which data are available, male suicide rates are at least twice as high as female suicide rates.
Please don't make statements like that. It upsets me.
In Europe there are no robust epidemiological data on the prevalence of rape or other sexual offences on men. Indeed, male rape did not exist in the eyes of UK law until 1994. Before this, male rape was classified as indecent assault. Following introduction of the new law, in 1995 there were 3142 indecent assaults and 227 rapes against men - an increase of 51% from 1994 (Stationary Office 1996). More recent Home Office Statistics show an increase of 400% in reported cases of male rape between 1995 and 2000. However, for many reasons, the vast majority of incidents of male rape go unreported.
Because attraction is something that happens on a very primal level. Its almost non-rational.CaptainKarma said:Alert, Alert, Biotruth detected. Repeat, Biotruth detected.the Dept of Science said:I'm a man... since when did I need a rights group?
But on a serious note, I do think that there is a great value in masculinity and its something that a lot of guys lack. I think that when it comes to a relationship, a man is most attractive when he is in control. This is hardwired by millions of years of evolution and it will be difficult to completely rid from our society. Its an unfortunate truth but its something that we have to live with.
This doesn't apply to things like business or politics, because these are relatively new social constructs and have no evolutionary basis. Ideally men and women should be equal in these areas.
This is a "war" in which both sides can win. It sounds kindof whack and corny but we just have to stop seeing it as a war and learn to respect each other, treat each other right and take responsibility for ourselves.
How exactly can you determine that men are "genetically programmed" to act in a specific way and that they aren't just socialised into it by our still heavily patriarchal society?
Hint: You can't.
If I can play devil's advocate here for just a second, maybe Andy would've noticed her disclaimer if her writing skills were at least on par with a Middle School education. I'm just saying. Seriously Vault101. I'm sorry, but it's just bugging me way too much to ignore. I mean, I got the gist of your post and everything, but people will take you a lot more seriously if you would type like I do. Would it kill you to at least capitalize when you're supposed to? Pretty please? For me?Mortai Gravesend said:Yes, she talks about it being the extreme end and you then accuse her of trying to portray all people in that group as being that way. Brilliant reading skills there dude.AndyFromMonday said:It's funny, people get blasted for misrepresenting feminism but you seem to be quite content with misrepresenting masculism.
Imagine for a moment you are living in renisanse Italy. You are trying to paint your picture of the ideal woman. If she is anything but, white, pale skinned, and slightly chubby then you are clearly not a renisanse painter. If however you paint a picture of a blonde, slightly tan, thin woman with large breasts then you a clearly a product of 21st century western culture.the Dept of Science said:Because attraction is something that happens on a very primal level. Its almost non-rational.CaptainKarma said:Alert, Alert, Biotruth detected. Repeat, Biotruth detected.the Dept of Science said:I'm a man... since when did I need a rights group?
But on a serious note, I do think that there is a great value in masculinity and its something that a lot of guys lack. I think that when it comes to a relationship, a man is most attractive when he is in control. This is hardwired by millions of years of evolution and it will be difficult to completely rid from our society. Its an unfortunate truth but its something that we have to live with.
This doesn't apply to things like business or politics, because these are relatively new social constructs and have no evolutionary basis. Ideally men and women should be equal in these areas.
This is a "war" in which both sides can win. It sounds kindof whack and corny but we just have to stop seeing it as a war and learn to respect each other, treat each other right and take responsibility for ourselves.
How exactly can you determine that men are "genetically programmed" to act in a specific way and that they aren't just socialised into it by our still heavily patriarchal society?
Hint: You can't.
Imagine being given a list of reasons why a particular man would be a good mate... wealthy, good genes, trustworthy, similar interests etc. Your rational mind would agree that he was a good mate, but you wouldn't exactly be horny for him.
Compare that to meeting a badass. Perhaps he has no qualities that make him a good mate (poor, unreliable, etc.), but most girls will be turned on by him. But you just know that if this guy lived 5000 years ago, he would be the one killing the lions.
From personal experience, the interactions and relationships that have gone best for me, have been the ones where I have been in control*, when I have made the plans and followed through with them. Women respond to confidence.
On the socialised point, I would say for me, its actually been the opposite. Connecting with my masculinity was something that I had to learn, having spent the majority of my life being pretty nervous around girls.
*in control as distinct from being controlling. Being in control comes from confidence, being controlling comes from insecurity.
Actually, the prize of manhood is far greater than most people seem to be aware of.RedEyesBlackGamer said:It is bullshit. The western male really has nothing to complain about.
Except it is true. My statement is simply that "this happens." I wasn't aware that I'd made "happens every time, on a global scale" was a criteria. I mean, the oppression of minorities and women certainly is not happening "on a national scale" in America, in and of itself -- it's just that instances of it receive national attention, whereas injustices toward people (who happen to be white males) are not given attention.Kaulen Fuhs said:Except it isn't true. Categorically speaking, of course. I can't speak for all cases, but this simply doesn't happen on a global, or even national scale.