Wasn't the Lion King essentially a version of Hamlet with the third act reworked to be less depressing?Queen Michael said:That movie had no more to do with the Jungle Book than The Lion King did with Hamlet.
Wasn't the Lion King essentially a version of Hamlet with the third act reworked to be less depressing?Queen Michael said:That movie had no more to do with the Jungle Book than The Lion King did with Hamlet.
Could just be going the deception route with Kaa, make her(I guess...) out to look like someone untrustworthy and stuff in the trailer. But the actual movie is not quite as blatant, to cover for the help that might happen later towards the end. They have done it before after all.Johnny Novgorod said:It's ScarJo.
Kaa was male both in the book and the Disney movie.
Looks like they're making Kaa into a villain again. Shame cause he's an ally in the book.
Probably a good job that this isn't a reboot of anything then. Different adaptations of a book are not necessarily reboots of each other, any more than you could consider a Shakespeare performance to be a reboot of a previous performance. As it is, the "gritty reboot treatment" here actually appears to be a far more faithful adaptation of the source material than the Disney version, which really had very little to do with the book other than the character names.JaredJones said:dunno, maybe I'm alone in thinking a movie about singing orangutans voiced by Louis Prima wasn't meant for the gritty reboot treatment.
Caramel Frappe said:Also did they make the Python turn into a female? The voice sounds feminine to be honest.
At least among the constrictors, boas and pythons, female snakes are typically larger than their male counterparts. Gender-switching the large and long character makes sense to me.Hawki said:So Kaa's a female now?
It's more or less like the Disney movie, except in the book Kaa's an ally to Mowgli, Baloo and Bagheera's personalities are reversed (Bagheera's the laid back fun guy, Baloo is all about responsibilities), the episode with the monkeys is there but there's no King Louie or any one leader, Shere Khan is offed halfway into the book (by Mowgli), Mowgli's inception into human society doesn't happen at the end nor does it sever his ties with his animal buddies like the movie implies and generally there's a more episodical structure in the novel, which includes several stories that have nothing to do with Mowgli.Shinkicker444 said:Could just be going the deception route with Kaa, make her(I guess...) out to look like someone untrustworthy and stuff in the trailer. But the actual movie is not quite as blatant, to cover for the help that might happen later towards the end. They have done it before after all.Johnny Novgorod said:It's ScarJo.
Kaa was male both in the book and the Disney movie.
Looks like they're making Kaa into a villain again. Shame cause he's an ally in the book.
I'm curious how it will go, I watched both the other movies and read the book when I was but a wee lad, but for the life of me I can't remember squat about it really. Except for Kaa, Bagheera and some British colonials.
The internet commands me to point out that this is Disney making it, as both are Disney productions the Disney version doesn't make sense in context, Disney animation would be far better.Kahani said:Probably a good job that this isn't a reboot of anything then. Different adaptations of a book are not necessarily reboots of each other, any more than you could consider a Shakespeare performance to be a reboot of a previous performance. As it is, the "gritty reboot treatment" here actually appears to be a far more faithful adaptation of the source material than the Disney version, which really had very little to do with the book other than the character names.JaredJones said:dunno, maybe I'm alone in thinking a movie about singing orangutans voiced by Louis Prima wasn't meant for the gritty reboot treatment.
"I want you off the fucking jungle, Mowgli! You and me are done professionally".P-89 Scorpion said:Christian Bale as Bagheera.
Eh, no... Malick's visuals have soul and beautifully naturalistic photography captured in-camera and wholly on set, whilst this crappy CG-fest looked--- well, blandly CG.JaredJones said:Malick-ian visuals!!