The "JX23 Scandal"

Recommended Videos

Griffolion

Elite Member
Aug 18, 2009
2,205
0
41
Hey everyone,

I don't know if you've heard of what's gone on with the Youtube Commentator JX23 but basically here goes.

Allegedly, he's been soliciting girls under the age of 18 for indecent photographs using Skype. Here are the pictures: http://imgur.com/a/aPGVQ#GW5Jl

Here is an account from one of the girls that have been solicited: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWbbXeaB2UQ

Here is a video in defence of JX23: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GwypzEDBXI


I personally don't have a strong opinion either way. I realise that speaking definitively in terms of the law, he did break the law in what he did. But there's also the issue of the girls not blocking him, consciously accepting the pictures etc. I think all this serves to highlight how weird the law (especially British) law in all this is, and how divided people can become about an issue like this.

So what's your opinions? By the way, let's keep it clean yeah? We're Escapists, not arseholes.
 

Hamish Durie

New member
Apr 30, 2011
1,209
0
0
Ok he broke the law but then again in the sense that the girls didn't block him or try to stop him so no harm done on one side you have the law and on the other you have the poeple who this was actually about. personally i'm going in favour of this guy the govenrment here is basiclly invading his private life and jailing him for trying to live his life outside the boundries that they have placed for him
 

WheresMyJetpack

New member
Jun 24, 2011
1
0
0
1) it's legal in the UK once you turn 16. I'm an American boy who knows a nice girl in Scotland (we talk a lot)
2) he is in NO WAY a pervert. He did the equivalent of walking up to a bar skank and flirting around
3) after the flirting, things got hotter, but WE ALL KNOW SHE WANTED IT TO GO THAT WAY
4) JX made it pretty obvious that some pictures were about to be shared, but she didn't stop him
5) THe girl got the picture and was prompted with a warning message from Twitter.
6) Dumb ***** opens the file
7) Dumb ***** gets attention hungry
8) JX23 LOSES HIS ONLY SOURCE OF INCOME

now if he had known he was dealing with some serious phyco girl, I don't he would have risked his job. He was pretty damn confident that she wanted things to go further
 

Lullabye

New member
Oct 23, 2008
4,424
0
0
using skype to hit on girls. woop de doo.
You know if he really wants to see young naked ladies all he has to do is go to omegle.
I don't get why people keep doing this on the net though. is it the lack of potential consequence or what?
 

skywalkerlion

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,259
0
0
I like to think I'm pretty far into the commentator scene..

but I don't know who JX23 is. Apparently PKA is talking about it tonight but I'm too tired to listen D:
 

Tdc2182

New member
May 21, 2009
3,623
0
0
I was wondering what this was about.

Luckily he's in the UK, because the Child sex offender laws here are way too strict.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
ravensheart18 said:
Sorry, I'm missing it, whats the discussion value? Older man asks younger girl for pics. Many girls agree. It's illegal. This has been going on since kids discovered the internet in the late 90s.
Totally this. Only on the internet (and within organizations such as NAMBLA) is this the subject of debate. The fact that the girls willingly accepted skype requests from him doesn't make them consenting adults.

The men I've known who have pursued, dated and slept with minors, whether they met them in person or on the internet, all have one common thread: they don't feel that they can persuade a grown woman with an adult's sense of herself to suck their dick, so they try to go after vulnerable children. That the laws are just feels redundant to say so. I don't feel any better for this guy than I do a date rapist.

Please read that last sentence thoughtfully before putting words in my mouth :)
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
WheresMyJetpack said:
1) it's legal in the UK once you turn 16. I'm an American boy who knows a nice girl in Scotland (we talk a lot)
2) he is in NO WAY a pervert. He did the equivalent of walking up to a bar skank and flirting around
3) after the flirting, things got hotter, but WE ALL KNOW SHE WANTED IT TO GO THAT WAY
4) JX made it pretty obvious that some pictures were about to be shared, but she didn't stop him
5) THe girl got the picture and was prompted with a warning message from Twitter.
6) Dumb ***** opens the file
7) Dumb ***** gets attention hungry
8) JX23 LOSES HIS ONLY SOURCE OF INCOME

now if he had known he was dealing with some serious phyco girl, I don't he would have risked his job. He was pretty damn confident that she wanted things to go further
And yet, even though you base your assertion that "WE ALL KNOW SHE WANTED IT TO GO THAT WAY," which is the frat boy date rapist battle cry, based solely on the 'evidence' that he was confident that she wanted him, it is she who is a dumb ***** and not he?

Someone, please clarify. If he didn't break the law, how did he lose his only source of income?
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
TheGoldenMan said:
funguy2121 said:
WheresMyJetpack said:
1) it's legal in the UK once you turn 16. I'm an American boy who knows a nice girl in Scotland (we talk a lot)
2) he is in NO WAY a pervert. He did the equivalent of walking up to a bar skank and flirting around
3) after the flirting, things got hotter, but WE ALL KNOW SHE WANTED IT TO GO THAT WAY
4) JX made it pretty obvious that some pictures were about to be shared, but she didn't stop him
5) THe girl got the picture and was prompted with a warning message from Twitter.
6) Dumb ***** opens the file
7) Dumb ***** gets attention hungry
8) JX23 LOSES HIS ONLY SOURCE OF INCOME

now if he had known he was dealing with some serious phyco girl, I don't he would have risked his job. He was pretty damn confident that she wanted things to go further
And yet, even though you base your assertion that "WE ALL KNOW SHE WANTED IT TO GO THAT WAY," which is the frat boy date rapist battle cry, based solely on the 'evidence' that he was confident that she wanted him, it is she who is a dumb ***** and not he?

Someone, please clarify. If he didn't break the law, how did he lose his only source of income?
Ah. But she was in no way retarded. She could handle seeing it. Seeing as how she fooled around with the pic.

She is just being a attention whore really. She had the choice to not look as well as block and discontinue talking all together. But she went along with it.
Because she's a hoe in training

Sorry, being raised in a "1 man/ 4 women" environment. I know that a woman can be as deceiving, no matter her age. None the less. We are looking to deep in to this. We're invading this mans privacy in something that really shouldn't be our concern. He fucked up, big time. She's a hoe, big time.
Funny how quick you and so many of your peers are to call a woman a "hoe" (she isn't a shovel) when you don't know her. A teenaged boy or, I dare say a grown man, acting like a hyperhorny hound dog is just being a man, but a teenaged girl acting sexual is a ho? That's not logical. Your misogyny is showing. Would you be calling her a ho if homeboy hadn't gotten in trouble? I'm guessing not.

And privacy is not an ideal that exists to be coopted by predators. If he were concerned with privacy, he wouldn't have broadcast his winky on the internet. "But there's protections!" And there's hackers. Didn't Ballsa-didn't Lulsac hack into thosands of FB pages and provide cookies and porn content from the users' hard drives just a couple of weeks ago? And where were all of you a couple of weeks ago, when the Wiener (snicker snicker) scandal involving an adult woman broke?
 

Custard_Angel

New member
Aug 6, 2009
1,236
0
0
WheresMyJetpack said:
1) it's legal in the UK once you turn 16. I'm an American boy who knows a nice girl in Scotland (we talk a lot)
2) he is in NO WAY a pervert. He did the equivalent of walking up to a bar skank and flirting around
3) after the flirting, things got hotter, but WE ALL KNOW SHE WANTED IT TO GO THAT WAY
4) JX made it pretty obvious that some pictures were about to be shared, but she didn't stop him
5) THe girl got the picture and was prompted with a warning message from Twitter.
6) Dumb ***** opens the file
7) Dumb ***** gets attention hungry
8) JX23 LOSES HIS ONLY SOURCE OF INCOME

now if he had known he was dealing with some serious phyco girl, I don't he would have risked his job. He was pretty damn confident that she wanted things to go further
HI JX23!

WELCOME TO THE ESCAPIST!
 

Dags90

New member
Oct 27, 2009
4,680
0
0
ravensheart18 said:
Sorry, I'm missing it, whats the discussion value? Older man asks younger girl for pics. Many girls agree. It's illegal. This has been going on since kids discovered the internet in the late 90s.
The discussion value is apparently in calling any female who is known to have had sex, or seen a penis willingly a 'whore, dumb ***** ho'. You know, become some "Youtube commentator" is out of a job. Honestly, "Youtube commentator" reminds me of this [http://www.theonion.com/articles/pop-culture-expert-surprisingly-not-ashamed-of-sel,18481/] article.
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,773
0
0
Hamish Durie said:
Ok he broke the law but then again in the sense that the girls didn't block him or try to stop him so no harm done on one side you have the law and on the other you have the poeple who this was actually about.
Actually he didn't break the law, the legal age in UK is 16.

I think he was a creepy dumbass to send his dick to a chick on the internet when she didn't ask for it and she was a dumbass for opening it and not blocking him when he was making advances.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
TheGoldenMan said:
funguy2121 said:
TheGoldenMan said:
funguy2121 said:
WheresMyJetpack said:
1) it's legal in the UK once you turn 16. I'm an American boy who knows a nice girl in Scotland (we talk a lot)
2) he is in NO WAY a pervert. He did the equivalent of walking up to a bar skank and flirting around
3) after the flirting, things got hotter, but WE ALL KNOW SHE WANTED IT TO GO THAT WAY
4) JX made it pretty obvious that some pictures were about to be shared, but she didn't stop him
5) THe girl got the picture and was prompted with a warning message from Twitter.
6) Dumb ***** opens the file
7) Dumb ***** gets attention hungry
8) JX23 LOSES HIS ONLY SOURCE OF INCOME

now if he had known he was dealing with some serious phyco girl, I don't he would have risked his job. He was pretty damn confident that she wanted things to go further
And yet, even though you base your assertion that "WE ALL KNOW SHE WANTED IT TO GO THAT WAY," which is the frat boy date rapist battle cry, based solely on the 'evidence' that he was confident that she wanted him, it is she who is a dumb ***** and not he?

Someone, please clarify. If he didn't break the law, how did he lose his only source of income?
Ah. But she was in no way retarded. She could handle seeing it. Seeing as how she fooled around with the pic.

She is just being a attention whore really. She had the choice to not look as well as block and discontinue talking all together. But she went along with it.
Because she's a hoe in training

Sorry, being raised in a "1 man/ 4 women" environment. I know that a woman can be as deceiving, no matter her age. None the less. We are looking to deep in to this. We're invading this mans privacy in something that really shouldn't be our concern. He fucked up, big time. She's a hoe, big time.
Funny how quick you and so many of your peers are to call a woman a "hoe" (she isn't a shovel) when you don't know her. A teenaged boy or, I dare say a grown man, acting like a hyperhorny hound dog is just being a man, but a teenaged girl acting sexual is a ho? That's not logical. Your misogyny is showing. Would you be calling her a ho if homeboy hadn't gotten in trouble? I'm guessing not.

And privacy is not an ideal that exists to be coopted by predators. If he were concerned with privacy, he wouldn't have broadcast his winky on the internet. "But there's protections!" And there's hackers. Didn't Ballsa-didn't Lulsac hack into thosands of FB pages and provide cookies and porn content from the users' hard drives just a couple of weeks ago? And where were all of you a couple of weeks ago, when the Wiener (snicker snicker) scandal involving an adult woman broke?
Sorry. I hate women, OBVIOUSLY!
I'm glad we agree!
 

Griffolion

Elite Member
Aug 18, 2009
2,205
0
41
Clearly some people didn't read the last line in my OP...

EDIT: To anyone who is saying it's legal because the legal limit in the UK is 16. That's not entirely accurate. To have sexual contact (having sex, oral etc) is fine. However being incited to send or receive indecent images (like the ones JX23 sent and those he asked for off the girls) is illegal up to 18 as that comes under the rules of pornography. Like I said, weird laws. My friend said it best, the last time the Sexual Offenses Act was revised was 2003, before the social media and connectivity we see today even thought about taking off; so the law is incredibly disparate in relevance to the act today. It could do with a revision.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
TheGoldenMan said:
funguy2121 said:
Funny how quick you and so many of your peers are to call a woman a "hoe" (she isn't a shovel) when you don't know her. A teenaged boy or, I dare say a grown man, acting like a hyperhorny hound dog is just being a man, but a teenaged girl acting sexual is a ho? That's not logical. Your misogyny is showing. Would you be calling her a ho if homeboy hadn't gotten in trouble? I'm guessing not.

And privacy is not an ideal that exists to be coopted by predators. If he were concerned with privacy, he wouldn't have broadcast his winky on the internet. "But there's protections!" And there's hackers. Didn't Ballsa-didn't Lulsac hack into thosands of FB pages and provide cookies and porn content from the users' hard drives just a couple of weeks ago? And where were all of you a couple of weeks ago, when the Wiener (snicker snicker) scandal involving an adult woman broke?
(1)Sorry. I hate women, OBVIOUSLY!
(2) Not only did she have the maturity to handle seeing this mans genitals, from what I under stand, (3)That she not only edited it to look like a cucumber.

(4) Frankly, I don't care about anyone involved. (5)I can call a whit person a cracker, and a man... (6)Shit, i need a slang for man. They both fucked up. That's enough for me.

Whatever. World isn't ending. Just people bein' stupid.

(7) Just an FYI, I'm not racist, I just like seeing people mad, so I insult stuff. (8)It they don't like being trolled, They stop talking to me.
1. Yeah, you just said that. Jesus, I get the point, you have issues with the girlies!
2. Methinks you don't know what "maturity" means
3. And...confirmed.
4. Teens and their fake apathy. After your first post on this thread, I don't think you're going to convince anyone that you're cool and indifferent. You obviously give a shit.
5. What is a Whit person?
6. Pig. Breeder. (I am a straight white man - this isn't hard). Again, your misogyny is showing. Your sarcasm earlier (both times) was as transparent as your indifference.
7. Just an FYI, I am neither a child molester nor a war criminal.
8. The final stage of denial, acceptance. OK. Also...T-shirt! It don't like being trolled indeed.
 

Zaik

New member
Jul 20, 2009
2,073
0
0
How are you going to complain about this when you just distributed alleged CP?

Not exactly a great move.