The Lost And Damned DLC: Now With Extra Peen

Yog Sothoth

Elite Member
Dec 6, 2008
1,037
0
41
Alone Disciple said:
Yog Sothoth said:
Alone Disciple said:
While I enjoy Rockstar games and will still most likely buy the DLC anyway and beleive in free speech and all that....I just have to ask: "Why Rockstar? Why?"

What relevant point are they trying to make that the game can't be enjoyed by having said pixelated congressman be wearing a towel?

Yes, yes...I get the idea that it's rated 'M', and all the arguments about parents being tuned into what their kids are buying, but the fact being that 'M' titles bought in stores can at least be monitored by astute employees. With DLC, this falls way...way short. Any kid who has a MS points card (not M when purchased) can get the appropriate amount of points and download the game with no checks in place. Anyone with a balance of MS points can download, with no age check in place.

I can understand the 'hidden hot-coffee' code by an over-zealous programmer showing off and giggling behind closed doors, but this is purposely blatant and serves no gaming purpose or game function other than to stir up controversy. You can't tell me or convince me the story would be ruined one iota if the penis was covered by a towel for the few seconds on screen (especially a cut scene). This is sheerly for press coverage only.

I hate to say it, but I have no qualms about those that bring lawsuits against them in this instance. You can't tell me in all their testing, dev talks, layouts, programming, story writing, that no one at Rockstar may have raised an eye-brow at this. They pushed it through anyway.

Maybe a hefty lawsuit in which they lose may send a message to other developers. Should there be an 'X' rating beyond 'M'? And how do you control this in the DLC arena with point cards that are indiscriminate on how they are used.

Stupid. Stuoid. Stupid.
Your assertion that there isn't any protection or guards in place to prevent minors from obtaining this content is false. The 360 has parental controls that prevent users who are minors from downloading and playing M rated games and content. I see posts on the official Xbox forums daily asking how to bypass these locks. The answer is always the same: You can't. Your only recourse is to actually wait until you're 18. That's it.

If you're a parent and you're not using these tools, then you fail as a parent or guardian, simple as that. If you're not closely monitoring your children's media consumption, again you fail. It is not the responsibility of developers to ensure that your kids aren't being exposed to adult content. A child can just as easily order adult movies though pay-per-view service if it's not password protected and monitored.

This is a simple First Amendment rights issue, and should be clear cut. Take responsibility for your kids and their media consumption. Don't try to pass the buck, it's a cop out and it's irresponsible.

The answer is not litigation. The answer is personal responsibility.

EDIT: And what the hell are you doing if you're letting your kid play GTA IV in the first place? If that's going on, then you've already lost the battle....

EDIT 2: And yes, there is already a rating above M, it's Adults Only or "AO" but almost no retailers will carry a game if it has this rating.
Okay, for technicality sake I guess you can argue (rightly so) that there are 'safe guards' in place. But that's a technicality. In 'reality' and in day-to-day 'practice' I dare say most parents don't even have a clue on how to turn on parental controls, let alone find it on the Xbox and again maybe knowing it even exists.

I'd wager it's common sense taht if asked most parents would indeed say "Yeah, I think my 'kids' machine probably has parental controls, but do they use it? Most TV's and cable boxes have a V-chip also installed, but I garner the vast majority of people don't mess with their TV settings to make sure their kid isn't watching Nip/Tuck or something else.

I absolutely agree with you 100% that is is personal responsibility, but unless you are living in an alternate earth, you know darn well most are clueless.

I also beleive in the first amendment, but I also can recognize when companies are pushing the envelope further and further for no particular gain other than to be controversial. As many people have already pointed out, "Why do we need a penis in a cutscene?"

Yes, I know it's a crime sim. I play it myself. I know it's a M title, and I play it along with other M titles as well, but Rockstar in this instant is being gratuitious for controverys sake only. This isn't a game enhancement. This isn't a story enhancement. This isn't a dirty easter egg or mod.

The fact being that my son or daughter buys a MS card and if I didn't set the parental controls, they can easily download it....no questions asked. Yes, there are employee's at GameStop or other stores that should monitor,.....some do, some don't, but at least there is a minor catch here in hoping an employee is following through. In the DLC world, it's free reign.

Am I saying Rockstar should stop making games? Nope, not at all. Maybe they should opt for an 'X' rating instead of 'M'. Maybe MS should more safe guards in place on Marketplace to make sure age is verifiable (not sure how you do it)....or maybe you just cover the wang with at towel. Somehow I doubt this is a pivitol moment in the game, so it's content is questionable other than for peer shock vale and to get us talking. Bad press indeed makes for good press afterall...marketing 101.

I also don't think litigation is the answer either, we are too much a litigious society as it is. In this case, I make a personal exception, they knew well ahead of time this may cause a little 'ire' amongst people, and given the cahnce they could have taken the conservative route, but they chose not to. But if someone (as wrong as you and I both may think it is) won a sizeable judgement, enough where it actually made developers re-think some of their decisions lest it cost them, wacky publicity stunts like this would go away.

And in the end, good game or not, free speech or not....this is just a 'controversial' stunt for 'stunt' sake.
Well, I'll certainly agree with you that the only reason that Rockstar did this was to stir up controversy. But I stand by my statement that there are tools on place to assist parents in blocking mature content from their kids, and that it's the parents responsibility to make sure that they're not accessing this content against their wishes.

Ignorance is not an excuse. Game developers and console manufactures have done most everything in their power to give parents the tools they need to protect their kids from adult content. The ball is now in the parents' court, and if they can't do their part I have no sympathy for them. If we adopt the mentality that only game makers are responsible for protecting our kids, where will that lead us? I have a pretty good idea, and it's not somewhere that I want to go....
 

Nimbus

Token Irish Guy
Oct 22, 2008
2,162
0
0
Alone Disciple said:
Okay, for technicality sake I guess you can argue (rightly so) that there are 'safe guards' in place. But that's a technicality. In 'reality' and in day-to-day 'practice' I dare say most parents don't even have a clue on how to turn on parental controls, let alone find it on the Xbox and again maybe knowing it even exists.
That is entirely their own fault. If a parent dosn't think their child should be viewing mature content, and can't work parental controls, then shame on them. They should either set aside a wekked to learn how to use them, or throw out any and all electronic media in their homes.

The point is, the parent CAN prevent their children accessing the media.

Oh, and as to your "X" rating, it already exists. It's called "AO", and most stores in the USA won't stock AO games. Having an AO rating is commercial suicide. THAT is why Rockstar won't settle for AO ratings. (At least, in America. In the rest of the world, 18+ games are readily accessable.)
 

the protaginist

New member
Jul 4, 2008
1,411
0
0
Stylish_Robot said:
This just in: we have received reports that disbarred and all-around annoyance Jack Thompson is threatening to visit everyone's house to prevent them from buying the new Grand Theft Auto IV DLC, stating that "it will teach underaged kids how to have sex".

You know it's gonna happen.
I can imagine it. Little Billy Mcmicspam has just returned from Gamestop with his MS points. He gets on the marketplace, the happiness in his eyes radiating off the TV. When, Whats this?
A very old man swings in through a window, smelling of alcohol. "Gimme 'at!" he shouts as he wrestles the controller away from Billy. He finally succeds in breaking the 10 year old's grip, stashes the controller in his jacket, jumps out the window to the Jackmobile. Little Billy stares off as the man drives off in a beat up Hybrid, shouting, "Jack Strikes again!"
the boy then grabs his Wireless controller off the shelf, and procedes to download the game.
 

Yog Sothoth

Elite Member
Dec 6, 2008
1,037
0
41
SomeBritishDude said:
kickin wiing said:
I find it funny how you can show all the boobs you want in a video game and people don't seem to mind, but if you have one cut scene with a penis in it their brains explode.

Newsflash : People have genitals!
Yer, This is a good point. Why are people getting in a fit about it?
Because it hasn't been done before, and people are generally more threatened by penises than boobs. I suspect that Rockstar may have had another reason aside from grabbing some headlines for doing this. I think they're trying to see just how much they can get away with. This does set something of a precedence as a means to bypassing an AO rating by introducing the more "hardcore" content via DLC. Up to this point, I've never seen a console game with full frontal nudity.....
 

Kriegsherr

New member
Jan 10, 2009
120
0
0
Zac_Dai said:
They should of gone all the way and made it an erect penis.

Would have multiplied controversy by a 1000!
They should have it start off flaccid and then rise slowly as conversation progresses. Although that seems a little too homoerotic for my tastes :p On the other hand I don't own a 360 so I guess that means no dicks for me
 

ProfessorLayton

Elite Member
Nov 6, 2008
7,452
0
41
This is purely for controversy. Just like Mass Effect sold more because of the accidental press fox news gave it, TLAD will probably get noticed for it too.
 

Teh_Doomage

New member
Jan 11, 2009
936
0
0
This just seems like another year of controversy from the guys that well, generate a lot of it.

Keep pushing boundaries!
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,202
0
0
"Oh boy! I get to see a penis!" That'll be every 8-year old's dream upon hearing this bit of news...

I doubt that the guy's wang will be on display, it'll most likely be below a table.

But yeah, point has already been made: to be of legal age to play this, you should already know a fair bit about the birds and the bees.

Oh, and I'm not getting this anywho, as GTA 4 was a putoff for me. I recently played Saint's Row 1, and it felt more fun. (Ah, poetic coincidence...)
 

Aries_Split

New member
May 12, 2008
2,097
0
0
Indigo_Dingo said:
orannis62 said:
mydogisblue said:
Wait, so there's going to be an actual visible penis in this game?


Um...Why?
Somehow, I doubt anyone at Rockstar even thought to ask that.
They were tired and Microsoft demanded something controversial.

That may sound fanboyish, but if you have a better explanation I'd like to hear it.
Nail on the head Dingo. Nail on the head.
 

Yog Sothoth

Elite Member
Dec 6, 2008
1,037
0
41
scotth266 said:
"Oh boy! I get to see a penis!" That'll be every 8-year old's dream upon hearing this bit of news...

I doubt that the guy's wang will be on display, it'll most likely be below a table.

But yeah, point has already been made: to be of legal age to play this, you should already know a fair bit about the birds and the bees.

Oh, and I'm not getting this anywho, as GTA 4 was a putoff for me. I recently played Saint's Row 1, and it felt more fun. (Ah, poetic coincidence...)
I've seen a video clip of the offending cut scene, and it's not below a table or anything. It is in plain view, scrot, bush and all for a good 15 to 20 seconds... more than long enough to scar you for life...

*shudders*
 

Velocirapture07

New member
Jan 19, 2009
356
0
0
Why couldn't it have been something female...I don't feel like seeing a penis in a game, I mean I see one every time I go to the bathroom. Seriously Rockstar....wtf?
 

Valiance

New member
Jan 14, 2009
3,823
0
0
MaxTheReaper said:
Nothing wrong with being a rebel. I think they're just being silly, personally. We know they love controversy, and they probably just met up and said, "You know what, guys? Let's animate a penis."
So they did.
And then they laughed at the outrage it would cause.
You got to it before I did.

It's not so much "This will enhance gameplay" as is the "You know what we're famous for? Pissing people off."

And so they want to continue to do that.
 

Jamash

Top Todger
Jun 25, 2008
3,638
0
0
It seems petty, but do you think Rockstar included this because in Saint's Row 2 the nudity & penises were pixalated?

It like they're trying to go one up on Volition, sending the message that they're still king of the contraversial sandbox game.
 

Captain Blackout

New member
Feb 17, 2009
1,056
0
0
ok, when has ANYTHING in the GTA series NOT been controversial? If your worried about that, go play a Disney game.

Who wanted a full frontal women? I WANT MORE MEN AND WOMEN! I WANT IT ALL!!!! I WANT FLACCID, ERECT, AND BENT!!!! and more boobs.

I have a parental control system at home. Doesn't require any tech savvy. It's called "You're not bloody well playing that game in my house and I will remove the system if you even think of trying!" And yes, I bloody well read minds, sod off.

Yes, I find most of this thread to be a bit of a joke. Not the fault of anyone here, it's inherent in the species.

Captain "I will hurt you in new and fascinating ways if you cross Yog" Blackout.

P.S. Joke's on me. Now I discover page one of the posts. More intelligence there.

Captain "I'm as bad as the rest of the species" Blackout
 

Yog Sothoth

Elite Member
Dec 6, 2008
1,037
0
41
Captain Blackout said:
ok, when has ANYTHING in the GTA series NOT been controversial? If your worried about that, go play a Disney game.

Who wanted a full frontal women? I WANT MORE MEN AND WOMEN! I WANT IT ALL!!!! I WANT FLACCID, ERECT, AND BENT!!!! and more boobs.

I have a parental control system at home. Doesn't require any tech savvy. It's called "You're not bloody well playing that game in my house and I will remove the system if you even think of trying!" And yes, I bloody well read minds, sod off.

Yes, I find most of this thread to be a bit of a joke. Not the fault of anyone here, it's inherent in the species.

Captain "I will hurt you in new and fascinating ways if you cross Yog" Blackout.
Helluva first post, bro....

Mods, don't be too hard on him. He's a good bloke, just a little outspoken sometimes... I already warned him about the all caps being a no-no and it won't happen again...

While I appreciate your stance on trying to defend me, it's really not necessary, especially here. But it's a nice gesture...

Welcome to the Escapist, Blackout.......

EDIT: Back on topic, the media is going to have a huge field day with this... you all thought "hot coffee" was bad, that was nothing. This will bring down a shit storm of unprecedented proportions upon the gaming culture, mark my words......