Shocksplicer said:
Sir Thomas Sean Connery said:
Shocksplicer said:
Sir Thomas Sean Connery said:
Shocksplicer said:
27% of people saved the Quarians? That should probably read "27% of people weren't paying attention when it turned out that the Quarians were the bad guys in that conflict.".
Uh, no.
No no no no no no no no no.
How about "27% of people chose to give the persecuted if somewhat dickish people their home planet back instead of siding with the kitchen appliances and killing millions of mostly innocent people." Much more fitting.
Though obviously saving both is the best option.
OT:
Cool stats. A bit surprised at how few finished insanity. ME2 was far harder.
Though I did notice one stat that made me wonder something....
YOU CAN KILL VEGA? HOW TELL ME HOW RIGHT NOW.
Or, "27% of people chose to give the rightfully persecuted arseholes the planet instead of the relatively innocent, intelligent Geth"
More accurately, "27% of people gave the planet back to the people who have been wrongfully persecuted by most of the galaxy and only wanted their home back and picked the living, mostly innocent people in their fleet over the peices of hardware, only one of which even comes close to approaching life"
......Ok, these are getting too long. Can we just drop the pretense and argue about this properly?
OK fine. Every single bad thing that happened to the Quarians they brought on themselves. They enslaved a race of synthetic beings, then tried to commit genocide on them when they realised they were intelligent. They fled the planet because the Geth defended themselves, then spent centuries without a home, despite the fact that the Geth were perfectly willing to negotiate the entire time, the Quarians just never asked. Then, at the climax of the war, the Quarians (Admittedly just one extremist but the rest of the fleet would have followed) decided to continue trying to commit said genocide, despite the fact that they know peace is possible. If they go through with this, the Geth are forced to defend themselves. And finally, if the Quarians are able to commit genocide, they all celebrate by throwing a fucking party celebrating the unjust destruction of an intelligent race. If the Geth win, they express sorrow that it has come to this.
Whereas your argument is: They're synthetic, so they don't matter.
Well, no, it isn't. The Geth are wonderful and deserve a chance to become more than they are now.
As I said before, the scenario where both live is FAR superior.
However, when push comes to shove, I choose to save Quarian lives over Geth hardware.
Yes, the Quarians did some pretty shitty things. While I would disagree that they "enslaved" anyone, as the Geth were initially no more than clever pieces of machinery, they did still wrongly attempt to destroy them and didn't even attempt peace and understanding.
However, they are still persecuted by the rest of the galaxy simply for being nomads. Everyone dislikes them simply because they have no home.
Finally, when it comes down to it, the only real decision is this: Kill millions of Quarians, all of whom are highly complex, fully intelligent life forms, most which should carry no blame for the shitty things of their ancestors.
OR
Destroy the Geth who, while intelligent and sympathetic, cannot compare to truly living things. They still feel little to no emotion and, other than Legion, have a lack of basic life qualities.
It's a wonderfully difficult situation with no good decision, but I have to go with the Quarians.
Besides, I always get annoyed when Bioware pulls manipulative nonsense like with the recordings you see when you go into the Geth data center. It just makes me want to go the opposite direction of where they're trying to push me.