Such a simple comment, and yet I think you're right. When I get tired of my current past-gen games, I think I'll give that a try. Nintendo's the only company right now that seems to have the foresight not to bankrupt itself with overly-costly products. It'll still be awhile until then. I've got lots of old games that I haven't played yet.InvisibleMan said:Hey, there's always the Wii U...
No, they charged you a quid and then cheated you out of it with undodgable attacks and rubble banding.BigTuk said:Well the difference between today's paywalls and the arcade is that the arcades did not charge a $30 entrance fee.
I was born in '87 and I've only been in one arcade my whole life. Was not fun at all.tehroc said:Today's generation wouldn't get this, they have no idea what an arcade is.
I'm left wondering how long it'll be before we have a generation that doesn't know what a quarter is.tehroc said:Today's generation wouldn't get this, they have no idea what an arcade is.
That still doesn't make sense. You wrote that you paid "thousands" for the arcade cabinet, and then had to keep putting quarters in it.MinionJoe said:Not really. It was just like the strip implies. Whenever you went into an arcade, you had to buy one of the consoles before you could play it (by shoveling in quarters).Covarr said:You owned the arcade cabinet? Didn't it have a DIP switch to enable free play mode? Or were the quarters just to add to the experience?
P.S. Thanks
And just like today's home consoles, you didn't really own the arcade system either. They remained the property of the manufacturer because of the EULA you agreed too by walking through the front door of the arcade.