I think it's worth mentioning that the people you are talking about aren't worth mentioning. 30,000 people you say? That's 30,000 people who shouldn't get a say in the direction of a product they won't support. Then again, I feel the same way about anyone who posts an unjustified zero or ten. And by justified, I mean that the game has to be either of no redeemable value(even a broken game can be patched), or be a true flawless gem in order to deserve either extreme. In the end though, the only thing being accomplished here is the destruction of any credibility user reviews might have had. They're even somehowworse than IGN's reviews.Leole said:Actually, 30,000 people.Awexsome said:Maybe one or two then?Leole said:I.. I hope you guys realize that the game got leaked earlier and plenty of people downloaded it illegally.
Not all those reviews are for the explicit purpose of bombing.
It's a large concerted effort by unhappy fanboys and haters that had no intention of doing anything other than this well before any of them even played the game if they did at all. Don't defend that which isn't worth defending.
Just look at the leechers and seeders.
Right now, there's 28k Leechers, and 4k seeders. And that's just today, imagine how many peers stopped seeding when it finished downloading? And that's just ONE leaked version, I'm assuming there's a couple more.
Don't just dismiss my argument. Plenty of people played the leaked version and didn't like the game.
I am not justifying their actions, though, I'm pretty sure the game doesn't deserve a 0.
By the way, there is one thing I would zero rate if I could: ME2's DLC installation script. Apparently(and I just ran across it last night), it introduces a bug on installations running on 64-bit OS's that makes the game consistently crash on Illium unless you run the game in Windowed mode, and Bioware has yet to resolve the issue. We are long past the possibility of Bioware patching it at this point, so I could entertain a zero being awarded to that feature.