Well shallow as it may sound to some one who is so obviously into the arty-rape film genre, I watch films entirely for entertainment. Sure I get emotional during films, but the only emotion these kinda movies would convey to me is disgust. Why on earth anyone would want to watch a film that has a guy forced to rape his own son and other such pedophilic/ necrophilic themes is beyond me.Housebroken Lunatic said:You don't watch films like that for "enjoyment" of the action going on on-screen, but for the enjoyment of the fact that the film might have a really profound impact on you emotionally (even though in a severely uncomfortable manner).Wadders said:Urgh, why would you even watch something like that? What normal person would derive any enjoyment from such a film?
I haven't seen this one though, but im considering it since I guess im curious what all the fuss is about. But I have seen Irreversible, which has quite a nasty and full frontal rape-scene that made my blood pumping (no from arousal though mind you, but from genuine rage and despair).
It's not "pretty" to watch, but it's not meant to be "pretty" either. Art doesn't have to be "pretty". In fact, some art has to be ugly to get the point across...
What point is that sort of film trying to get across exactly? That rape and necrophelia and other such stuff is abhorrent? Well shit, do you really need to sit through 110 minutes of weird torture porn to realise that?
I'm sure there are other ways of "getting your blood pumping" that dont make people think you're a freak.